Smackems v The Trotters

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by thebish » Sat Dec 18, 2010 4:46 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
TheMackem wrote:To be fair RTG is full of morons.
Told you we wouldn't lose though, at home we're unbelievable.
Well, you were right, you didn't lose. Unbelievably lucky not to have been playing with ten men too. If that had been a Bolton player challenge the ref would have had red card in hand before the ball even reached him. Unbelievably lucky your keeper pulled off the save of the season too. :wink:
or... good keeping? :wink:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Dec 18, 2010 4:54 pm

thebish wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
TheMackem wrote:To be fair RTG is full of morons.
Told you we wouldn't lose though, at home we're unbelievable.
Well, you were right, you didn't lose. Unbelievably lucky not to have been playing with ten men too. If that had been a Bolton player challenge the ref would have had red card in hand before the ball even reached him. Unbelievably lucky your keeper pulled off the save of the season too. :wink:
or... good keeping? :wink:
I thought that's what I wrote when I said "pulled off the save" ? Not luck on the keepers part, just bad luck for us he had the reflexes and skill to do it.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by thebish » Sat Dec 18, 2010 5:03 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
thebish wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
TheMackem wrote:To be fair RTG is full of morons.
Told you we wouldn't lose though, at home we're unbelievable.
Well, you were right, you didn't lose. Unbelievably lucky not to have been playing with ten men too. If that had been a Bolton player challenge the ref would have had red card in hand before the ball even reached him. Unbelievably lucky your keeper pulled off the save of the season too. :wink:
or... good keeping? :wink:
I thought that's what I wrote when I said "pulled off the save" ? Not luck on the keepers part, just bad luck for us he had the reflexes and skill to do it.
fair enough - but a rocky road to stumble down - cos then we'd have to say that we were unbelievably lucky to beat Blackburn because we have a midfielder capable of that fantastic chested volley to go 2-1 up.. :wink:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Dec 18, 2010 5:06 pm

Here, TheMackem. North easterners have always been known as a hardy breed. Does it not irritate you to see all this falling down and dying under snowflake challenges? Whatever anybody says about us, you can't accuse us of being softies. Some of the ariel acrobatics in stripes was positively embarrasing today.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Dec 18, 2010 5:50 pm

Thought neither side was very good. And we were equally as bad or good as them. On that basis we deserved a draw and should have had one right at the end through Klasnic who had he got his shooting boots on would have had a hattrick today.

Fairly dire defending all round for their goal.

But was the difference today not a shitty piece of keeping from Jussi compared to a piece of brilliance from Gordon?

I'd say that was what won em the game and lost it for us.

Not much else to say. Lets hope we bounce back on boxing day!

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by thebish » Sat Dec 18, 2010 5:57 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote: Not much else to say. Lets hope we bounce back on boxing day!
we have won 29 of the 86 games we have ever played on boxing day...

we have played west brom several times on boxing day...

1910 lost 2-0 away
1923 won 5-0 away
1949 won 3-0 at home
1951 lost 3-2 away

since 2001 we have only ever won twice on boxing day - both times against Newcastle...

Ianmooreslovechild
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Ianmooreslovechild » Sat Dec 18, 2010 5:59 pm

Didn't think it was Jussi's fault.Can't see us keeping a clean sheet this season.I'll say nowt about Cahill and Knight as a centre half pairing,it's already been said.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:00 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote: Not much else to say. Lets hope we bounce back on boxing day!
we have won 29 of the 86 games we have ever played on boxing day...

we have played west brom several times on boxing day...

1910 lost 2-0 away
1923 won 5-0 away
1949 won 3-0 at home
1951 lost 3-2 away

since 2001 we have only ever won twice on boxing day - both times against Newcastle...
Interesting, well we do usually have a slump around now!

Beat West Brom and its been a good month, draw and its been ok.

Lose and its been a bit dissapointing!

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:01 pm

Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Didn't think it was Jussi's fault.Can't see us keeping a clean sheet this season.I'll say nowt about Cahill and Knight as a centre half pairing,it's already been said.
The defending for their goal was shite all round.

I still don't know what Jussi was doing though. Surely he time to react better than that? He must of been expecting a near post shot when Bent got himself in that position!

Ianmooreslovechild
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Ianmooreslovechild » Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:09 pm

It was a close range block.haven't seen it since but at the time I didn't find myself swearing at the keeper.

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:26 pm

Bad day at the office, draw would have been fair. It's away from home and one of our better players was being rested, can't grumble too much. Maybe CYL was rested to try and sweeten the South Korean FA and let him stay here a bit longer before the Asian Cup.
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

thevza
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:38 am
Location: Nantes, Fr

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by thevza » Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:57 pm

missed the first half, the second half was really not entertaining at all. To be honest I thought we were going to pull out an equalizer up until the final whistle, guess the last couple of months gets one's hopes up.

wanderers_on_tour
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1317
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by wanderers_on_tour » Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:58 pm

does the fact chungy will be heading abroad for a short while mean we will re-call danny ward for cover on the wing along with rodrigo? does anyone know what the situation with his loan spell at coventry is? i know hes been injured a fair whack like but not sure what the actual in's and out's of his loan spell are

H. Pedersen
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2438
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by H. Pedersen » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:11 pm

Cattermole should have gone for the tackle on Elmander. Second yellow, if not a straight red. The referee was abysmal, in the pocket of Bruce and the Sunderland supporters all day.

That said we never really got going. I thought Klasnic was going to have another one of his super-sub appearances but he looked off the pace. I guess you can't expect a guy to play 15 minutes every other week and still be sharp when the ball falls to him.

madmarx
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:18 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by madmarx » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:39 pm

H. Pedersen wrote:Cattermole should have gone for the tackle on Elmander. Second yellow, if not a straight red. The referee was abysmal, in the pocket of Bruce and the Sunderland supporters all day.

That said we never really got going. I thought Klasnic was going to have another one of his super-sub appearances but he looked off the pace. I guess you can't expect a guy to play 15 minutes every other week and still be sharp when the ball falls to him.
That will be why he was booed off at half time with " cheat " ringing in his lugs cos he was giving Sunderland everything ?
I thought he favoured Bolton first half and kept his cards in his pocket on more than one occasion, i certainly recall one 2 footed challange that went unpunished,in the middle just inside the Bolton half ? ( admittedly he did get the ball but you cant jump in like that these days )

I agree with you the ref was poor but i didnt see any Sunderland bias, most refs hate us anyway.

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:56 pm

madmarx wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:Cattermole should have gone for the tackle on Elmander. Second yellow, if not a straight red. The referee was abysmal, in the pocket of Bruce and the Sunderland supporters all day.

That said we never really got going. I thought Klasnic was going to have another one of his super-sub appearances but he looked off the pace. I guess you can't expect a guy to play 15 minutes every other week and still be sharp when the ball falls to him.
That will be why he was booed off at half time with " cheat " ringing in his lugs cos he was giving Sunderland everything ?
I thought he favoured Bolton first half and kept his cards in his pocket on more than one occasion, i certainly recall one 2 footed challange that went unpunished,in the middle just inside the Bolton half ? ( admittedly he did get the ball but you cant jump in like that these days )

I agree with you the ref was poor but i didnt see any Sunderland bias, most refs hate us anyway.
let's be fair tho every team fans thinks the ref is againist them dont matter wat anyone says we are all bias to our team
could't give a feck who pulled who's hair we lost and that's that we move on :wink:
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

wanderers_on_tour
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1317
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by wanderers_on_tour » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:58 pm

just seen this on klasnic's twitter..says it all really;
Sorry lads that i didn t score the last chance.... I score this normally without eyes.. Sorry again ...
:pray:

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:05 pm

:pray: :pray:
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

madmarx
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:18 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by madmarx » Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:08 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:
madmarx wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:Cattermole should have gone for the tackle on Elmander. Second yellow, if not a straight red. The referee was abysmal, in the pocket of Bruce and the Sunderland supporters all day.

That said we never really got going. I thought Klasnic was going to have another one of his super-sub appearances but he looked off the pace. I guess you can't expect a guy to play 15 minutes every other week and still be sharp when the ball falls to him.
That will be why he was booed off at half time with " cheat " ringing in his lugs cos he was giving Sunderland everything ?
I thought he favoured Bolton first half and kept his cards in his pocket on more than one occasion, i certainly recall one 2 footed challange that went unpunished,in the middle just inside the Bolton half ? ( admittedly he did get the ball but you cant jump in like that these days )

I agree with you the ref was poor but i didnt see any Sunderland bias, most refs hate us anyway.
let's be fair tho every team fans thinks the ref is againist them dont matter wat anyone says we are all bias to our team
could't give a feck who pulled who's hair we lost and that's that we move on :wink:
Youre right like , when i watch it on sky later i always see a different game.

I think refs have been against us in general though , some of them strike poses and get a hard on over the hatred, then they re run match of the day and wank over the vitriol im sure of it. Riley, Bennet, Dean all stranglewankers.

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:14 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Didn't think it was Jussi's fault.Can't see us keeping a clean sheet this season.I'll say nowt about Cahill and Knight as a centre half pairing,it's already been said.
The defending for their goal was shite all round.

I still don't know what Jussi was doing though. Surely he time to react better than that? He must of been expecting a near post shot when Bent got himself in that position!
I thought he handled the Bent shot quite well, Sunderland were still second favourites with the rebound, and still managed to score.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 35 guests