Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Much prefer away days. Sounded dead at the 'Bok today.
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
I really don't know what some people expect. Given the spending power of the top six, the highest we're ever realistically likely to finish is seventh.Beefheart wrote:Think I heard someone say that they weren't going to renew their season ticket unless we make a lot of changes in the summer...as someone who has been to mostly away games this season I would have loved to have had a season ticket this year! Having seen us win 10 times and lose only 3 it seems great value for money.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:53 pm
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
could it also have something to do with the declining standard of the barclayspremierleague.BL3 wrote:We have the smallest squad in the Premier League and according to OC we're also in the bottom three in terms of spending.
He inherited a team that was in the bottom three from Megson who spent a sizeable amount on some very average players, so the fact that we've spent much of this season in the top half is a minor miracle and in no small part down to OC's ability as a manager.
As disappointing as the last three results have been, the players have still overachieved this season and for those moaning about the end to the season, there are still two games to play...
could be tantamount to heresy but OC still has a bit to prove for me. with no pressure on, against a weak Sunderland, most of our players were truly woeful today in terms of movement, passing and most worryingly positional awareness.
the only exceptions were Sturridge and Cahill whose play only demonstrate just how shite the rest were.
"A child of five would understand this- send someone to fetch a child of five"
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
So if the Premier League is full of average teams, doesn't that prove that OC has added something that all but seven other managers haven't been able to?lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:could it also have something to do with the declining standard of the barclayspremierleague.
most of our players were truly woeful today in terms of movement, passing and most worryingly positional awareness.
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Maybe he can't but that doesn't mean he has to shunt Sturridge out on the wing to accomodate the stumpofficer_dibble wrote:I do feel for Coyle, he can't change 8 or 9 players like he needs to, he'll have to work with cart horses like Muamba and Steinsson, deadwood like Davies and Robinson, for a while yet
Muamba is a very decent player who has regressed under Coyle
And Robinson was second in the BWSA POTY poll - a long way in front of his 2 million Spaniard
And taylor who is also shit is in front of his Bulgarian
And our manager who cannot be questioned keeps playing Zat fcuking Knight
Anybody still want to make a case for that
The top 10 finish and a cup semi make this a good season but as Coyle reminds us, it's fine margins
I'm less optimistic than I was 12 months ago
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
You've conveniently ignored the fact that Holden and Sturridge (without whom you seem to think we'd have been relegated) were also signed by Coyle and they've been two of our best players this season. Given the fact that he's had f**k all to spend, he's not done too badly so far.CAPSLOCK wrote:Muamba is a very decent player who has regressed under Coyle
And Robinson was second in the BWSA POTY poll - a long way in front of his 2 million Spaniard
And taylor who is also shit is in front of his Bulgarian
And our manager who cannot be questioned keeps playing Zat fcuking Knight
Anybody still want to make a case for that
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:53 pm
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
maybe. but its not proven- not after today and certainly not after Wembley. today was really poor and i dont buy the "nothing to play for" pish. there were plenty out there who have plenty to play for in my book.BL3 wrote:So if the Premier League is full of average teams, doesn't that prove that OC has added something that all but seven other managers haven't been able to?lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:could it also have something to do with the declining standard of the barclayspremierleague.
most of our players were truly woeful today in terms of movement, passing and most worryingly positional awareness.
big, big summer for Coyle.
on the whole i've been pleased with the quality of the games i've been to this season which i never was under Megson but the last few weeks have been very very poor.
"A child of five would understand this- send someone to fetch a child of five"
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
No, his signings are all great, including WheaterBL3 wrote:You've conveniently ignored the fact that Holden and Sturridge (without whom you seem to think we'd have been relegated) were also signed by Coyle and they've been two of our best players this season. Given the fact that he's had f**k all to spend, he's not done too badly so far.CAPSLOCK wrote:Muamba is a very decent player who has regressed under Coyle
And Robinson was second in the BWSA POTY poll - a long way in front of his 2 million Spaniard
And taylor who is also shit is in front of his Bulgarian
And our manager who cannot be questioned keeps playing Zat fcuking Knight
Anybody still want to make a case for that
You reckon you can tell me why he doesnt pick him
And Sturridge is great - not a right winger, like
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
So you're judging him on the last few games? What about the rest of the season? Eighth not good enough?lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:maybe. but its not proven- not after today and certainly not after Wembley.
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
BL3: Don't take it too serious. The mood on the site depends upon the result. If we beat Arsenal like we did less than 2 weeks ago the team, manager and players are gods. Play a couple bad games and it is time to line up the whole lot of them and shoot the bastards. Things tend to cool down as the week progresses.BL3 wrote:So you're judging him on the last few games? What about the rest of the season? Eighth not good enough?lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:maybe. but its not proven- not after today and certainly not after Wembley.
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
still carnt figure out why he dropped wheater for the semifinal .
you'd think he'd be back in the team by now. but it took him ages to drop petrov.
also 'our manager who cannot be questioned' as an abbrieviation -for use on here - is ace .
as in - "it seems like bolton havent won a game since christ was on the cross , its like OMWCNBQ is doing a impression of HWSNBN on purpose"
you'd think he'd be back in the team by now. but it took him ages to drop petrov.
also 'our manager who cannot be questioned' as an abbrieviation -for use on here - is ace .
as in - "it seems like bolton havent won a game since christ was on the cross , its like OMWCNBQ is doing a impression of HWSNBN on purpose"
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:53 pm
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
BL3 wrote:So you're judging him on the last few games? What about the rest of the season? Eighth not good enough?lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:maybe. but its not proven- not after today and certainly not after Wembley.
i,m not saying he's not the messiah
just that he might not be - and in those last few games including the utter shambles that was Wembley - he and the players he has selected have been short.
eighth is fine but we are 4 points clear of 14th and as someone else has said- fine margins
"A child of five would understand this- send someone to fetch a child of five"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Just a quick one .... was the first goal offide or not ?
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
re the first goal, was there a handball and then a foul on the left corner of the sunderland penalty area?
had a feeling that it was not going to be our day and what a kick in the teeth
had a feeling that it was not going to be our day and what a kick in the teeth
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
err... maybe because he signed him as cover - and that's precisely how he's using him?CAPSLOCK wrote: No, his signings are all great, including Wheater
You reckon you can tell me why he doesnt pick him
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
a1 wrote:still carnt figure out why he dropped wheater for the semifinal .
you'd think he'd be back in the team by now. but it took him ages to drop petrov.
also 'our manager who cannot be questioned' as an abbrieviation -for use on here - is ace .
as in - "it seems like bolton havent won a game since christ was on the cross , its like OMWCNBQ is doing a impression of HWSNBN on purpose"
didn't we beat arsenal a couple of weeks ago - or was I dreaming?
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Can we just stop this 'One who cannot be questioned' crap here, its utter bs and everyone knows it.
For example every supporter in the country questioned him over his choices at Wembley (starts for petrov and klasnic especially) and he took this on board and beat Arsenal the next week. Of course he can be questioned, he's only human at the end of the day, but unlike HWCNBN you can tell Owen is really trying, and giving his all to the club and to us the fans.
What people have to remember is there's only so much a manager can do with limited resources at a relatively small club (in terms of overall attendances/cash flow). Still feel a top 10 finish would be a job well done, would love to see us hold on to 8th but il settle for 9th if blackpool can stay up and wigan/west ham go down.
For example every supporter in the country questioned him over his choices at Wembley (starts for petrov and klasnic especially) and he took this on board and beat Arsenal the next week. Of course he can be questioned, he's only human at the end of the day, but unlike HWCNBN you can tell Owen is really trying, and giving his all to the club and to us the fans.
What people have to remember is there's only so much a manager can do with limited resources at a relatively small club (in terms of overall attendances/cash flow). Still feel a top 10 finish would be a job well done, would love to see us hold on to 8th but il settle for 9th if blackpool can stay up and wigan/west ham go down.
Last edited by wanderers_on_tour on Sat May 07, 2011 10:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8578
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm
- Location: Mid Sussex
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Yeah, was just a dream!thebish wrote:a1 wrote:still carnt figure out why he dropped wheater for the semifinal .
you'd think he'd be back in the team by now. but it took him ages to drop petrov.
also 'our manager who cannot be questioned' as an abbrieviation -for use on here - is ace .
as in - "it seems like bolton havent won a game since christ was on the cross , its like OMWCNBQ is doing a impression of HWSNBN on purpose"
didn't we beat arsenal a couple of weeks ago - or was I dreaming?

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
You wishGooner Girl wrote:Yeah, was just a dream!thebish wrote:a1 wrote:still carnt figure out why he dropped wheater for the semifinal .
you'd think he'd be back in the team by now. but it took him ages to drop petrov.
also 'our manager who cannot be questioned' as an abbrieviation -for use on here - is ace .
as in - "it seems like bolton havent won a game since christ was on the cross , its like OMWCNBQ is doing a impression of HWSNBN on purpose"
didn't we beat arsenal a couple of weeks ago - or was I dreaming?

-
- Legend
- Posts: 8578
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm
- Location: Mid Sussex
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
HMX wrote:You wishGooner Girl wrote:Yeah, was just a dream!thebish wrote:a1 wrote:still carnt figure out why he dropped wheater for the semifinal .
you'd think he'd be back in the team by now. but it took him ages to drop petrov.
also 'our manager who cannot be questioned' as an abbrieviation -for use on here - is ace .
as in - "it seems like bolton havent won a game since christ was on the cross , its like OMWCNBQ is doing a impression of HWSNBN on purpose"
didn't we beat arsenal a couple of weeks ago - or was I dreaming?

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 40 guests