Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:12 pm

This sounds like an instigated media release to fire a shot across our bows. "Look at us eh, we can buy anyone we want and for loads less than you want for Cahill. We don't want him or anything. Will you take 10?"
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:13 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:This sounds like an instigated media release to fire a shot across our bows. "Look at us eh, we can buy anyone we want and for loads less than you want for Cahill. We don't want him or anything. Will you take 10?"
let's hope so...

as DSB rightly points out - NOT getting the cash for cahill blows a MASSIVE hole in our squad-rebuilding plans....

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31616
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:29 pm

I hear good things from the low countries about Vertonghen. But yes, I'm hoping this is just a warning shot. I'm fairly sure Citeh would rather get a known EPL player, the failure rate of imports being higher than that of solid yeomen like Wayne Bridge, SWP, Bellamy, Lescott and... oh Christ.

Choppers
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 711
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: twitter.com/jebusf
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Choppers » Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:32 pm

If nobody is willing to pay that cash now, keep him.

MAYBE we can convince him to sign a new contract, ensuring when he eventually goes, we definitely get some money.
http://www.godisageek.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | A Videogame Site With A Difference
http://www.twitter.com/jebusf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | Twitter

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:46 pm

Think it'd be a lost cause to get him on a new deal. City/Arsenal I'm sure would be quite comfortable to say, look, sign for us, we'll double whatever you're on and here's 5 million up front to get you started.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

Salford Trotter
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1448
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:57 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Salford Trotter » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:22 pm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13700351.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

With Jones on his way, it appears, to Manure for £16m (after apparently turning down Arsenal and Liverpool) the young English centre half options are fast drying up for those clubs chasing our prized possession which makes our bargaining position stronger by the day.
The Voice Of Reason

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:49 pm

Salford Trotter wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13700351.stm

With Jones on his way, it appears, to Manure for £16m (after apparently turning down Arsenal and Liverpool) the young English centre half options are fast drying up for those clubs chasing our prized possession which makes our bargaining position stronger by the day.

or.... there are less and less options for Cahill...

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:56 pm

Nixon's latest 'scoop' is 15M plus a couple of fringe players at Arsenal.

I'd guess the couple of fringe players equates to Carlos and Vela.

Although what went down in January isn't great for him, I wouldn't mind bringing him in, we're going to be very short up front as things stand, we'd need options and I suppose he's kind of a like for like replacement for Moreno.

To be honest, I'd much rather Cahill go to Arsenal than City, both for his career and for the fact Arsenal fans actually want him whereas City fans talk about him as if he's the second coming of Gerald Cid but at the end of the day, it's all about who wants to pay more. If Arsenal are prepared to match City, then fantastic.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

Wandering Willy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Wandering Willy » Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:14 am

If Cahill's not already married he needs to get a wife pretty damn quickly. Then he can cheat on her and will become a nailed on cert for the England captaincy.

That should boost the price and speed things along.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:18 am

jimbo_bwfc wrote:Nixon's latest 'scoop' is 15M plus a couple of fringe players at Arsenal.

I'd guess the couple of fringe players equates to Carlos and Vela.

Although what went down in January isn't great for him, I wouldn't mind bringing him in, we're going to be very short up front as things stand, we'd need options and I suppose he's kind of a like for like replacement for Moreno.

To be honest, I'd much rather Cahill go to Arsenal than City, both for his career and for the fact Arsenal fans actually want him whereas City fans talk about him as if he's the second coming of Gerald Cid but at the end of the day, it's all about who wants to pay more. If Arsenal are prepared to match City, then fantastic.
On the radio they were talking about a few deals being close to finalized. ManU, Liverpool and Arsenal all picked up young, English defenders. I think Arsenal's came from the championship. Does this change anything?
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

a1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:11 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by a1 » Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:32 am

Armchair Wanderer wrote:
On the radio they were talking about a few deals being close to finalized. ManU, Liverpool and Arsenal all picked up young, English defenders. I think Arsenal's came from the championship. Does this change anything?
jack whiltshire might not get his 10 percent of the fee ?

:/

David Lee's Hair
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2422
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Cromwell Country

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by David Lee's Hair » Thu Jun 09, 2011 8:33 am

Think lower than the CHampionship for Arsenals signing....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13695799.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Professionalism, the last refuge of the talentless

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31616
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:31 am

jimbo_bwfc wrote:Nixon's latest 'scoop' is 15M plus a couple of fringe players at Arsenal.

I'd guess the couple of fringe players equates to Carlos and Vela.
Jimbo - got a link? Any guesses what other Vengaboyz we might be given?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:11 am

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
jimbo_bwfc wrote:Nixon's latest 'scoop' is 15M plus a couple of fringe players at Arsenal.

I'd guess the couple of fringe players equates to Carlos and Vela.
Jimbo - got a link? Any guesses what other Vengaboyz we might be given?
this is the Nixon story...

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Ar ... 45670.html

not - Nixo claims - £15million PLUS players - but £15million cash OR a player exchange deal...
Wenger has also made a fresh move for classy Cahill, ironically after pulling out of a potential double deal for Samba and Jones.

The Gunners chief was not prepared to meet the valuation on England Under-21 prospect Jones, who is now believed to be heading for Manchester United.

Arsenal would like to take England squad-man Cahill for around £15m cash or throw some of their fringe players into a part-exchange package.

Bolton also have interest from Manchester City, which also includes exchanges, but the Gunners may appeal more to Cahill.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31616
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:14 am

thebish wrote:not - Nixo claims - £15million PLUS players - but £15million cash OR a player exchange deal...
Arsenal would like to take England squad-man Cahill for around £15m cash or throw some of their fringe players into a part-exchange package.
Ta. Note bold. Clause is £17m, if we're playing the Ali hardball...

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:21 am

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
thebish wrote:not - Nixo claims - £15million PLUS players - but £15million cash OR a player exchange deal...
Arsenal would like to take England squad-man Cahill for around £15m cash or throw some of their fringe players into a part-exchange package.
Ta. Note bold. Clause is £17m, if we're playing the Ali hardball...
and - as you pointed out elsewhere - reducing fairly rapidly to zero over time! Presumably we are allowed to take £15mill for him if we choose... it's just that we are not forced to allow them to speak to him.

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:25 am

I'd actually be hard pressed to think of who we'd want from Arsenal that they would throw into a potential part-ex deal - Assuming they would be fringe players.

Onuoha or Boyata / both from City plus cash is more appealing, but if this wont happen then maybe a straight cash sale for whoever wants him rather than taking players for the sake of it would be better. PROVIDING...it doesnt drag on.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:27 am

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:I'd actually be hard pressed to think of who we'd want from Arsenal that they would throw into a potential part-ex deal - Assuming they would be fringe players.

Onuoha or Boyata / both from City plus cash is more appealing, but if this wont happen then maybe a straight cash sale for whoever wants him rather than taking players for the sake of it would be better. PROVIDING...it doesnt drag on.

I agree entirely. I'd MUCH rather have the cash and Coyle's freedom to find an up and coming cheapish option to replace Cahill than have to accept a player that might not quite fit and have to adapt the team around him....

LiOC
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 658
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:26 pm
Location: Preston

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by LiOC » Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:33 am

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:I'd actually be hard pressed to think of who we'd want from Arsenal that they would throw into a potential part-ex deal - Assuming they would be fringe players.

Onuoha or Boyata / both from City plus cash is more appealing, but if this wont happen then maybe a straight cash sale for whoever wants him rather than taking players for the sake of it would be better. PROVIDING...it doesnt drag on.
Agreed. We don't want arsenal defenders to replace him and the beauty of the City deal is we get cash and solve his replacement in one go. Straight cash is better, unless Arsenal have someone we actually have been looking at, not just "oh, we don't need him, ship him to bolton!"

Choppers
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 711
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: twitter.com/jebusf
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Choppers » Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:42 am

If we're talking deals with the Arse, £12 million + Gibbs and I'd be happy.
http://www.godisageek.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | A Videogame Site With A Difference
http://www.twitter.com/jebusf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | Twitter

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests