Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by bobo the clown » Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:22 pm

TKIZ! wrote:Gary Cahill is 5/6 to join Arsenal amid rumours of talks with the Bolton defender, while Cesc Fabregas is 1/5 to depart The Emirates for Barcelona this summer. Click here for our Transfer Specials
No, we're signing Fabregas ?!?!?! Whey-hey Owen, nice one !

(is this how Chinese Whispers start ?)
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:15 pm

jimbo_bwfc wrote:One from Capslock's best mate Marc Iles: "Cahill latest in the BN tomorrow. One interesting development and a fairly definitive statement."
Do me a favour

You're sad enough

Lets see if Iles 'exclusive' has already been reported before it appears on a version of the BEN or Iles twatter page


FWIW - I'd go for the definitive being that he isn't leaving for less than 17 million, cash, no player + deals

Interesting development? Ermm, there isn't a 'sell on' owed to Villa, perchance


Anywway, do that for me

There's a good lad
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
truewhite15
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3033
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by truewhite15 » Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:29 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:
jimbo_bwfc wrote:One from Capslock's best mate Marc Iles: "Cahill latest in the BN tomorrow. One interesting development and a fairly definitive statement."
Do me a favour

You're sad enough

Lets see if Iles 'exclusive' has already been reported before it appears on a version of the BEN or Iles twatter page


FWIW - I'd go for the definitive being that he isn't leaving for less than 17 million, cash, no player + deals

Interesting development? Ermm, there isn't a 'sell on' owed to Villa, perchance


Anywway, do that for me

There's a good lad
Anyone ever called you Ebenezer?

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:49 pm

F*cking hell, cheer up. It's a forum, very few people are, as they say, 'in the know', I very much doubt anyone on here knows where Cahill is heading, who is coming and how much we'll be getting. No-one is under any illusion that the last 30 whatever pages and the last 100 and whatever pages in the other transfer bit is 99.9% speculation.

I can almost half-understand someone speaking in monotonous, condescending, dry sarcasm 24/7. To take the time and effort to log onto a website and type like that is a new one on me.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38822
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:02 pm

Jimbo I don't think Caps embraces the 'fun' of the transfer window. To be fair he is probably right not to get carried away and treat everything with cynicism. Likelihood is that all the Cahill to Arsenal talk has been premature and we will be non the wiser come next week!

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:08 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:Jimbo I don't think Caps embraces the 'fun' of the transfer window.
whereas one who does seem positively frolicky and jolly as we discuss transfers is.... errrrrr..... BWFCi! 8)

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31631
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:11 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:Ok we all know its not happening, BUT as a hypothetical situation and forgetting about wages, which of the 4 Spurs players rumoured to be offered would you take?

For me Bassong and Hutton would be no brainers, definitely improve us and realistically couldn't see us signing much better elsewhere.

Jenas, not for me.

Keane as it stands would be better than Robbie Blake but would not be worth it if we could bring in better.
Interesting hypothetical. All four (and Bentley) would improve us, natch, but it depends on wages - Keane's in particular will be out of our league.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:45 pm

jimbo_bwfc wrote:F*cking hell, cheer up. It's a forum, very few people are, as they say, 'in the know', I very much doubt anyone on here knows where Cahill is heading, who is coming and how much we'll be getting. No-one is under any illusion that the last 30 whatever pages and the last 100 and whatever pages in the other transfer bit is 99.9% speculation.

I can almost half-understand someone speaking in monotonous, condescending, dry sarcasm 24/7. To take the time and effort to log onto a website and type like that is a new one on me.
I await your report
Ta
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38822
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:22 am

Anyways most papers reporting City have pulled out of any deal.

Spurs are apparently "interested" but have to sell first before buying, and any deal is highly unlikely.

So it looks like we're at the mercy of Arsenal. Which could well mean we're a bit fooked here.

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by TKIZ! » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:28 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:Anyways most papers reporting City have pulled out of any deal.

Spurs are apparently "interested" but have to sell first before buying, and any deal is highly unlikely.

So it looks like we're at the mercy of Arsenal. Which could well mean we're a bit fooked here.
Looks likely
Pfffft.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:30 am

Just usual TW stuff. It won't help anyone's cause if they claim they'll do anything to get him.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:32 am

Lots of stuff going on behind the scenes no doubt. At least if 'arry's interested then its something to make Arsenal meet us somewhere close to what we want.

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:40 am

Lord Kangana wrote:Just usual TW stuff. It won't help anyone's cause if they claim they'll do anything to get him.
Roll on 1st July

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:46 am

Citeh are trying to make us jealous by looking at some posh foreign totty...
Manchester City's interest in Gary Cahill has waned and the club are looking at the Montenegro defender Stefan Savic, one of several lower-profile players identified as potential recruits.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:48 am

I thought it was that Belgian chap a few weeks ago?

Slags.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:49 am

But still they gotta decide, do they spend 8m on some untested foregin chappie, or 15 million on a proven Prem player which also gets their quota of UK players up. I stil think City are in the game on this one.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38822
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:01 am

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:But still they gotta decide, do they spend 8m on some untested foregin chappie, or 15 million on a proven Prem player which also gets their quota of UK players up. I stil think City are in the game on this one.
I don't think they are. Mancini was never that interested apparently, it was more Marwood who was advising the Cahill deal.

If City wanted him they'd have got him by now.

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:06 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:But still they gotta decide, do they spend 8m on some untested foregin chappie, or 15 million on a proven Prem player which also gets their quota of UK players up. I stil think City are in the game on this one.
I don't think they are. Mancini was never that interested apparently, it was more Marwood who was advising the Cahill deal.

If City wanted him they'd have got him by now.
I think thats a bit over the top..they may well have wanted him, but i'm assuming you mean 'at all costs', which assumes you know what we wanted from City in return - bearing in mind City's interest was in the earyl early stages of the TW stage, when we were probably a bit more relaxed about the whole situation.

Abs
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:19 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Abs » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:08 am

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:But still they gotta decide, do they spend 8m on some untested foregin chappie, or 15 million on a proven Prem player which also gets their quota of UK players up. I stil think City are in the game on this one.
The funny bit is Savic had a trail with Arsenal 18 months ago and could have had him for 1 million pound, and after a week of trail and a closed door game, they declined the chance sign him....Just give us Cahill, its just us and Harry left. And you dont wanna do deals with dodgy Harry

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38822
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:09 am

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:But still they gotta decide, do they spend 8m on some untested foregin chappie, or 15 million on a proven Prem player which also gets their quota of UK players up. I stil think City are in the game on this one.
I don't think they are. Mancini was never that interested apparently, it was more Marwood who was advising the Cahill deal.

If City wanted him they'd have got him by now.
I think thats a bit over the top..they may well have wanted him, but i'm assuming you mean 'at all costs', which assumes you know what we wanted from City in return - bearing in mind City's interest was in the earyl early stages of the TW stage, when we were probably a bit more relaxed about the whole situation.
We were talking to City for quite a while by all accounts. Its not like they don't have the money......

Arsenal hanging around twiddling their fingers and being indecisive is par for the course, but City probably had a look see then decided they'd look elsewhere.

Time will tell anyhow, but to me its not looking great. Hopefully Arsene will panic and do the deal!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 37 guests