shakers

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Thu Jul 28, 2011 11:01 am

BwfcDan wrote:
Lofthouse Lower wrote:No mate, he wasn't alone in the Adebayor chant.

He didn't go? Must have been accompanying his mrs to parents' evening
True. It's a bit like the pied piper to be honest, he belts out a song and the 'yoof' follow.
What a cock. I'd love to see him get a smack

Bruno3
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:02 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Bruno3 » Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:47 pm

Just seen a young lad of about 7 walking on Tesco car park in Bury wearing the full Wanderers home kit - That's the way to do it!

adamworthy2002
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1903
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: shakers

Post by adamworthy2002 » Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:57 pm

Not a great video but http://youtu.be/rQ_nX7NMewk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; from last night, the lads warming up before the game.


adamworthy2002
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1903
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: shakers

Post by adamworthy2002 » Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:31 pm

The whole game is on the bury website

http://www.buryfc.co.uk/articles/201107 ... ~1,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

It lets me log in with my Wanderers player account to watch it.


adamworthy2002
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1903
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: shakers

Post by adamworthy2002 » Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:30 pm

Okay, I've taken the goals from the full match video and put them on Youtube

http://youtu.be/b1rjIpBcnwY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9404
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: shakers

Post by Harry Genshaw » Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:45 pm

the Notlobbers won't bring 3k, they only brought 1500 in the Championship days for the live league game on Sky................they can't travel, won't travel, it is an extra 6 miles miles now they are in Horwich.
We cant travel 6 miles - They cant travel 6 yards

Outnumbered at home :lol:
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: shakers

Post by TANGODANCER » Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:12 pm

adamworthy2002 wrote:The whole game is on the bury website

http://www.buryfc.co.uk/articles/201107 ... ~1,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

It lets me log in with my Wanderers player account to watch it.
Cheers for that AW. Accepted my player account too. Well chuffed with Nige doing what a good Nigel should; running the spaces, taking the short ball and using it and changing the direction of play. Got some real strength in midfield now and all shaping up very nicely.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Prufrock » Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:18 am

Cahill's last goal in a Bolton shirt?

Outswinging corners?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: shakers

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:22 am

Prufrock wrote:Cahill's last goal in a Bolton shirt?

Outswinging corners?
Wouldn't be entirely sure about that, if Nixon is to be believed.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Prufrock » Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:31 am

Question marks are, as far as I'm aware, a universal indicator of being utterly sure TD :D
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: shakers

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:36 am

Prufrock wrote:Question marks are, as far as I'm aware, a universal indicator of not being utterly sure TD :D
Aye, so is the subjunctive. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Prufrock » Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:40 am

And sarcasm? :D

I can't see a subjunctive? There are a few conditionals though.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: shakers

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:42 am

Prufrock wrote:And sarcasm? :D

I can't see a subjunctive? There are a few conditionals though.
In the sense of doubt?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Prufrock » Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:58 am

I may be being very slow here; though it was pay-day at the pub I work at, and it is irresponsible to take it all away. Have I missed something? The only doubt I can see is your 'if Nixon...' sentence, which is a conditional, not a subjunctive. If that is the case I a)am being a pedantic cnut, and b)was confused by you inserting 'not' into your quotation of me.

:conf:
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:39 am

This "English" stuff. It'll never catch on. Too complicated.

Raven
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2004
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Near Coventry but originally from Kent

Re: shakers

Post by Raven » Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:17 pm

2399 wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote: Bury fans are quite intimidating. Saw them both last week. :lol:

There are more than two!
Doubt it, I reckon it was one standing by a big mirror
My dog (proper 57) had his anal glands emptied once and yes the smell is something to behold!!

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: shakers

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:23 pm

Prufrock wrote:I may be being very slow here; though it was pay-day at the pub I work at, and it is irresponsible to take it all away. Have I missed something? The only doubt I can see is your 'if Nixon...' sentence, which is a conditional, not a subjunctive. If that is the case I a)am being a pedantic cnut, and b)was confused by you inserting 'not' into your quotation of me.

:conf:
Question marks are, as far as I'm aware, a universal indicator of being utterly sure TD :D

Must be me too, but either you have to have "not" in there, or change sure to "unsure" surely?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Prufrock » Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:44 pm

I'd like to point the honourable gentleman back to me 'And sarcasm? :D' response.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: shakers

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:50 pm

Prufrock wrote:I'd like to point the honourable gentleman back to me 'And sarcasm? :D' response.
Yeah, I'll admit I did mis that one. Apologies. "Be" can also be subjunctive, but I concede the error. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: shakers

Post by Prufrock » Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:54 pm

Be that as it may, where you used it it was conditional :D.

This thread has trawled both ends of the English language spectrum!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dave the minion, Google [Bot] and 38 guests