shakers
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: shakers
What a cock. I'd love to see him get a smackBwfcDan wrote:True. It's a bit like the pied piper to be honest, he belts out a song and the 'yoof' follow.Lofthouse Lower wrote:No mate, he wasn't alone in the Adebayor chant.
He didn't go? Must have been accompanying his mrs to parents' evening
Re: shakers
Just seen a young lad of about 7 walking on Tesco car park in Bury wearing the full Wanderers home kit - That's the way to do it!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:41 pm
- Location: Bolton
Re: shakers
Not a great video but http://youtu.be/rQ_nX7NMewk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; from last night, the lads warming up before the game.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:41 pm
- Location: Bolton
Re: shakers
The whole game is on the bury website
http://www.buryfc.co.uk/articles/201107 ... ~1,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It lets me log in with my Wanderers player account to watch it.
http://www.buryfc.co.uk/articles/201107 ... ~1,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It lets me log in with my Wanderers player account to watch it.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:41 pm
- Location: Bolton
Re: shakers
Okay, I've taken the goals from the full match video and put them on Youtube
http://youtu.be/b1rjIpBcnwY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://youtu.be/b1rjIpBcnwY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9404
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: shakers
We cant travel 6 miles - They cant travel 6 yardsthe Notlobbers won't bring 3k, they only brought 1500 in the Championship days for the live league game on Sky................they can't travel, won't travel, it is an extra 6 miles miles now they are in Horwich.
Outnumbered at home

"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: shakers
Cheers for that AW. Accepted my player account too. Well chuffed with Nige doing what a good Nigel should; running the spaces, taking the short ball and using it and changing the direction of play. Got some real strength in midfield now and all shaping up very nicely.adamworthy2002 wrote:The whole game is on the bury website
http://www.buryfc.co.uk/articles/201107 ... ~1,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It lets me log in with my Wanderers player account to watch it.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: shakers
Cahill's last goal in a Bolton shirt?
Outswinging corners?
Outswinging corners?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: shakers
Wouldn't be entirely sure about that, if Nixon is to be believed.Prufrock wrote:Cahill's last goal in a Bolton shirt?
Outswinging corners?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: shakers
Question marks are, as far as I'm aware, a universal indicator of being utterly sure TD 

In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: shakers
Aye, so is the subjunctive.Prufrock wrote:Question marks are, as far as I'm aware, a universal indicator of not being utterly sure TD

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: shakers
And sarcasm? 
I can't see a subjunctive? There are a few conditionals though.

I can't see a subjunctive? There are a few conditionals though.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: shakers
In the sense of doubt?Prufrock wrote:And sarcasm?
I can't see a subjunctive? There are a few conditionals though.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: shakers
I may be being very slow here; though it was pay-day at the pub I work at, and it is irresponsible to take it all away. Have I missed something? The only doubt I can see is your 'if Nixon...' sentence, which is a conditional, not a subjunctive. If that is the case I a)am being a pedantic cnut, and b)was confused by you inserting 'not' into your quotation of me.


In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: shakers
This "English" stuff. It'll never catch on. Too complicated.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:04 pm
- Location: Near Coventry but originally from Kent
Re: shakers
Doubt it, I reckon it was one standing by a big mirror2399 wrote:BWFC_Insane wrote: Bury fans are quite intimidating. Saw them both last week.
There are more than two!
My dog (proper 57) had his anal glands emptied once and yes the smell is something to behold!!
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: shakers
Prufrock wrote:I may be being very slow here; though it was pay-day at the pub I work at, and it is irresponsible to take it all away. Have I missed something? The only doubt I can see is your 'if Nixon...' sentence, which is a conditional, not a subjunctive. If that is the case I a)am being a pedantic cnut, and b)was confused by you inserting 'not' into your quotation of me.
Question marks are, as far as I'm aware, a universal indicator of being utterly sure TD![]()
Must be me too, but either you have to have "not" in there, or change sure to "unsure" surely?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: shakers
I'd like to point the honourable gentleman back to me 'And sarcasm?
' response.

In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: shakers
Yeah, I'll admit I did mis that one. Apologies. "Be" can also be subjunctive, but I concede the error.Prufrock wrote:I'd like to point the honourable gentleman back to me 'And sarcasm?' response.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: shakers
Be that as it may, where you used it it was conditional
.
This thread has trawled both ends of the English language spectrum!

This thread has trawled both ends of the English language spectrum!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 36 guests