creeeeeckeeeett
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
South Africa not doing too well today
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
I doubt very much that view is shared by the ones they go against.What's the point of getting things wrong? We have the technology, why not use it?Lofthouse Lower wrote:Same thing with the tech in tennis and (maybe) football - takes away from the game to have every decision analysed.
Wrong decisions make the game more exciting.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Torn on this one. I still uphold that the Umpire's decision is final (as I suspect you did in your time Tango).
Over time, you get some good ones and some bad ones. Some change games, some don't.
I don't believe the games are any better with the introduction of technology, although I'm not against it as far as it's currently been implemented, I wouldn't miss it if it wasn't there either.
Over time, you get some good ones and some bad ones. Some change games, some don't.
I don't believe the games are any better with the introduction of technology, although I'm not against it as far as it's currently been implemented, I wouldn't miss it if it wasn't there either.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Would you prefer a game where you knew every single decision was 100% correct? I think I'd prefer a flawed game that provoked debate than a sterile one in which you sit passively.TANGODANCER wrote:I doubt very much that view is shared by the ones they go against.What's the point of getting things wrong? We have the technology, why not use it?Lofthouse Lower wrote:Same thing with the tech in tennis and (maybe) football - takes away from the game to have every decision analysed.
Wrong decisions make the game more exciting.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
KP not hanging around - 2 fours in a row - taking on Sreesanth
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
I did indeed, and technology was never in the equation, but even us old-timers have to admit the goalposts have moved and that technology is a reality that's ever moving on. Like you, I sometimes wish it hadn't in sport and the umpires are pretty good and always fair. I think my objection is more that individual bodies can choose to make their own rules.( and with that KP gets away with one).Worthy4England wrote:Torn on this one. I still uphold that the Umpire's decision is final (as I suspect you did in your time Tango).
Over time, you get some good ones and some bad ones. Some change games, some don't.
I don't believe the games are any better with the introduction of technology, although I'm not against it as far as it's currently been implemented, I wouldn't miss it if it wasn't there either.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Worthy4England wrote:Torn on this one. I still uphold that the Umpire's decision is final (as I suspect you did in your time Tango).
Over time, you get some good ones and some bad ones. Some change games, some don't.
I don't believe the games are any better with the introduction of technology, although I'm not against it as far as it's currently been implemented, I wouldn't miss it if it wasn't there either.
pretty much where I am - which isn't desperately commited to either side of the fence..
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Not sure the rules change. The only thing that changes is whether to use a particular technology for a particular series. I agree that if it's being used then there should be an ICC decision to use it universally.TANGODANCER wrote:I did indeed, and technology was never in the equation, but even us old-timers have to admit the goalposts have moved and that technology is a reality that's ever moving on. Like you, I sometimes wish it hadn't in sport and the umpires are pretty good and always fair. I think my objection is more that individual bodies can choose to make their own rules.( and with that KP gets away with one).Worthy4England wrote:Torn on this one. I still uphold that the Umpire's decision is final (as I suspect you did in your time Tango).
Over time, you get some good ones and some bad ones. Some change games, some don't.
I don't believe the games are any better with the introduction of technology, although I'm not against it as far as it's currently been implemented, I wouldn't miss it if it wasn't there either.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Geoffrey wrote:"I'd like to bat against this India attack, I tell you."

yeah Geoffrey - remind us once again what an awesome batsman you were - we'd almost forgotten since last time you told us...
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: creeeeeckeeeett

He wasn't happy when they brought up the Randall run out.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
One of my heroes as a kid. Great fielder. I can recall tracking him down in the car park at OT and asking him politely for his autograph.Wandering Willy wrote:![]()
He wasn't happy when they brought up the Randall run out.
His response?
"Fcuk off kid."
I played against him at Trent Bridge some considerable while later in a sponsorship game. Nearly got the bastard first ball with a beamer.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
KP out.
Domed.
Domed.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Shxt. Trott, Cook and Pieterssen down for 73. Need a bit of stability here.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
This Sreesanth lad looks pretty useful. All a bit nervy right now.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Now Strauss goes. 85-4 and India's day so far.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
That's one very unlucky pie you just ate. 

They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
88-6. Prior gone.TANGODANCER wrote:This Sreesanth lad looks pretty useful. All a bit nervy right now.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeckeeeett
Cook, Trott, Morgan and Prior got a combined total of 7. Wow.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests