Liverpool laughing stocks?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
Where are the twins?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
By the byblurred wrote:No, that's not shite - you always pay free transfers more than you do players that you've bought, precisely because you're saving money on transfer fees. That's the whole point of how the Bosman rule's been used for ages. Which is why I was so sceptical of Joe Cole's move around this time last year when everyone was proclaiming it as a bargain and a brilliant move.CAPSLOCK wrote:The gloryhunting carrot cruncher will no doubt tell me this is shite, but heyho
As John W Henry, the club's principal owner, said recently: "The worst surprise [following FSG's takeover last October] was the lack of depth in the squad. Our biggest concern in taking on this responsibility was this issue and it was a bigger issue than we feared. There was a huge multi-year payroll for a squad that had very little quality depth."
The free signings Joe Cole and Milan Jovanovic, for example, earn £100,000 and £120,000 a week at Liverpool respectively, although the latter's
astonishing salary includes a signing-on fee payable over the first 12 months of his contract
As to whether the figures are right my guess is that they're likely to be inflated, because players' wages are always inflated in the media. I don't know why they've decided to include Jovanovic's signing on fee in his monthly wage (all players have signing on fees, typically paid over a period of time). I'd imagine Jovanovic to be on a much lower basic wage than Cole (and I bet the latter's signing on fee isn't taken into account in that £100k figure quoted above, either). Either do both or neither, because that doesn't make for a fair comparison of their respective costs.
6 million on Jovanovic
In one fcuking year
Good God
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
having just signed Enrique for £10mill, King Kenny has now taken his spending to £107million....
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
Does that include selling Torres for 50m?thebish wrote:having just signed Enrique for £10mill, King Kenny has now taken his spending to £107million....
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
Beefheart wrote:Does that include selling Torres for 50m?thebish wrote:having just signed Enrique for £10mill, King Kenny has now taken his spending to £107million....
no - because that's not spending!

-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
So what has he recouped then? Only, if his spending is net £57m, he'd better bloody get that CHampions League place or there'll be egg on the face of a few down the Anfield Road.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
I'm thinking of opening a florists in the Anfield area around next April/May.
The queue's to lay wreaths to their fckd up club will be humungous.
The queue's to lay wreaths to their fckd up club will be humungous.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
not really what they were hoping for from a home fixture against Blunderland.....
maybe they need a new Central Defender??
maybe they need a new Central Defender??
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
They looked very very good the first 30 minutes or so. By the end they looked rather lost.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
See they've got a new diving champion and card-waver up front.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
Decent goal by Larsson.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
Rather better than decent I'd say. It was a real belter. Nolan once did something similar against..Blackburn?Annoyed Grunt wrote:Decent goal by Larsson.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
Odd game. Straightest of straight reds not given. Pool dominated the game, but, if Seb Larsson's goal had been scored by, say Wayne Rooney, against, say Man City, they'd still be wanking over it
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
You're not wrong there.Prufrock wrote:Odd game. Straightest of straight reds not given. Pool dominated the game, but, if Seb Larsson's goal had been scored by, say Wayne Rooney, against, say Man City, they'd still be wanking over it
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
It was a brilliant goal.
Doubt that Liverpool will be panicing that much though after that game. They started off very well. That Henderson fella based upon his first game should be loaned out to Blackpool or similar type team though. Would have had a better chance to win if he was not on the pitch. 20m and based upon yesterday's performance was fit to shine the boots of Eagles or Coker.
Doubt that Liverpool will be panicing that much though after that game. They started off very well. That Henderson fella based upon his first game should be loaned out to Blackpool or similar type team though. Would have had a better chance to win if he was not on the pitch. 20m and based upon yesterday's performance was fit to shine the boots of Eagles or Coker.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
Professional footballer scores volley....wow that's new
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
if Seb Larsson's goal had been scored by Muamba, LL would still be wanking over it.Prufrock wrote:Odd game. Straightest of straight reds not given. Pool dominated the game, but, if Seb Larsson's goal had been scored by, say Wayne Rooney, against, say Man City, they'd still be wanking over it

-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
If Muamba had attempted that, the ball would still be going up in the air now
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?

In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Liverpool laughing stocks?
Liverpool would've lost that game last season
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests