Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
hmmm... this sounds quite likely... (they have been shipping preseason goals) - I was half asleep - but I also heartd this rumoured on R5 this morning in one of their short sports bulletins.. if it's gonna happenm - soonr rather than later, please.jimbo_bwfc wrote:Liverpool are the latest club in the mix.
Apparently Daily Mail going big on the story, their backpage. Story from Dom King, former Liverpool Echo writer, whether that means he has his ear any closer to the wall I've no idea, but I certainly hope someone comes in and bids for him.
Liverpool might be ideal if they throw N'Gog into the deal, saves us having to fork out money for a striker. Wouldn't mind getting Danny Wilson in on the act too, on loan.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
jimbo_bwfc wrote:Liverpool are the latest club in the mix.
Apparently Daily Mail going big on the story, their backpage. Story from Dom King, former Liverpool Echo writer, whether that means he has his ear any closer to the wall I've no idea, but I certainly hope someone comes in and bids for him.
Liverpool might be ideal if they throw N'Gog into the deal, saves us having to fork out money for a striker. Wouldn't mind getting Danny Wilson in on the act too, on loan.
oooooooooooh no
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
I reckon if we pulled in 10M+ Coyle would be on the phone straight away with City to try and bring in Onouha. I'd hope so anyway.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
He (unsurprisingly) turned QPR down - reckon he'd move to us too.
Would be delighted with that Ngog deal.
Would be delighted with that Ngog deal.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
If Liverpool are going to be in it's a shame he has a release clause, otherwise I'm sure they'd bid 20m.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
It's gotten to the stage now where each new Gary Cahill rumour is just 'mehhhh'...but if there's any substance in it then i hope it gets done quickly.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Maybe they will anyway 

- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31639
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Liverpool spent a lot early on, which could mean they have a bottomless pit or they burned through a budget. I get the feeling it's more of the latter, although if they're being poop in pre-season they might persuade John W Henry's Fenway Sports Group to sub them some money.
They certainly do need a centre-half, preferably a ball-player, and I've said for a while that Cahill fits the bill. And although (part-)swaps are, as many have said, much harder to complete over here, it probably helps that they have a property (Ngog) that we'd want. As a side issue they have a few youngsters Dalglish blooded last season who might be further from the first team after the influx, so it's not far-fetched to imagine they might be the latest to send a sapling to the Coyle Finishing School.
Onuoha would be a possibility - more so than a month ago when he apparently turned us down, 'cos since then he's been ignored by Mancini, left out of the club's trips to the USA and Dublin – and we're certainly a better prospect for him than QPR. However, a bent-nosed problem looms in the north-east: backed by money from Darren Bent's departure, Jordan Henderson's overvaluation and Ellis Short's back pocket – and hankering for more signings after an early-summer splurge on Wes Brown, John O'Shea, Seb Larsson, Conor Wickham, Craig Gardner, David Vaughan and Keiren Westwood – Steve Bruce has been on SSN parping on about watching the City situation (the Cituation?) and having designs on SWP and Onouha, the defender having had a reasonably successful loan there last season.
They certainly do need a centre-half, preferably a ball-player, and I've said for a while that Cahill fits the bill. And although (part-)swaps are, as many have said, much harder to complete over here, it probably helps that they have a property (Ngog) that we'd want. As a side issue they have a few youngsters Dalglish blooded last season who might be further from the first team after the influx, so it's not far-fetched to imagine they might be the latest to send a sapling to the Coyle Finishing School.
Onuoha would be a possibility - more so than a month ago when he apparently turned us down, 'cos since then he's been ignored by Mancini, left out of the club's trips to the USA and Dublin – and we're certainly a better prospect for him than QPR. However, a bent-nosed problem looms in the north-east: backed by money from Darren Bent's departure, Jordan Henderson's overvaluation and Ellis Short's back pocket – and hankering for more signings after an early-summer splurge on Wes Brown, John O'Shea, Seb Larsson, Conor Wickham, Craig Gardner, David Vaughan and Keiren Westwood – Steve Bruce has been on SSN parping on about watching the City situation (the Cituation?) and having designs on SWP and Onouha, the defender having had a reasonably successful loan there last season.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
I'm not sure, after signing Mears (thus freeing up Ricketts), that we're as hell bent on finding a Gary replacement. I've often wondered whether Wheater was signed in anticipation of a bid last January.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31639
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Yeah, Wheater was probably signed with half an eye on Cahill's departure. But I'd be shocked and scared if we didn't get one in when Gaz leaves. It might be back up to Boro for yon Aussie...Lord Kangana wrote:I'm not sure, after signing Mears (thus freeing up Ricketts), that we're as hell bent on finding a Gary replacement. I've often wondered whether Wheater was signed in anticipation of a bid last January.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Wouldn't be unhappy with that.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Yeah, Wheater was probably signed with half an eye on Cahill's departure. But I'd be shocked and scared if we didn't get one in when Gaz leaves. It might be back up to Boro for yon Aussie...Lord Kangana wrote:I'm not sure, after signing Mears (thus freeing up Ricketts), that we're as hell bent on finding a Gary replacement. I've often wondered whether Wheater was signed in anticipation of a bid last January.
didn't Boro "slap" a £900million transfer valuation on him?
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Coyle puts the Liverpool rumours to bed and calls it "irresponsible journalism".
Play the fecking game Coyle! After putting all these 30m...err 25m...I meant 20m...ok,ok 17m pricetags on his head, he now seems to be giving daily announcements about no-one bidding for Cahill.
Either keep quiet or play it subtle. No-one's going to bid anything more than 6-7M if they realise they don't have to.
Play the fecking game Coyle! After putting all these 30m...err 25m...I meant 20m...ok,ok 17m pricetags on his head, he now seems to be giving daily announcements about no-one bidding for Cahill.
Either keep quiet or play it subtle. No-one's going to bid anything more than 6-7M if they realise they don't have to.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Fixedjimbo_bwfc wrote:Coyle puts the Liverpool rumours to bed and calls it "irresponsible journalism".
Play the fecking game Coyle! After putting all these 30m...err 25m...I meant 20m...ok,ok 17m pricetags on his head, he now seems to be giving daily announcements about no-one bidding for Cahill.
Either keep quiet or play it subtle. No-one's going to bid anything more than 6-7M if they realise he's not worth it.

-
- Reliable
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:08 pm
- Location: Burnden Terrace
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
I just wish someone would bid!! Getting tired of it now. Coyle has played it all wrong. Clubs know they don't have to bid until the last few days in August....leaving us completely on our arse!!
"Anything else you'd like? How about real lead in the radiation shields? Urinal cakes, maybe?"
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
I'm not convinced he's a 20M player either, but I'd say he's worth 10M of anyone's money when you consider how much teams at the top have paid for absolute shite.Lofthouse Lower wrote:Fixedjimbo_bwfc wrote:Coyle puts the Liverpool rumours to bed and calls it "irresponsible journalism".
Play the fecking game Coyle! After putting all these 30m...err 25m...I meant 20m...ok,ok 17m pricetags on his head, he now seems to be giving daily announcements about no-one bidding for Cahill.
Either keep quiet or play it subtle. No-one's going to bid anything more than 6-7M if they realise he's not worth it.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38826
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
We should have sold Cahill last summer or last January if we could. Given we're where we are....
I'm not sure there is anything we can do now other than hope against hope that we can sign him up for an extra year or two.
Having said all that its not that nobody has bid what we want, nobody has bid full stop. Not even a cheeky 7M. Coyle needs to try and work some magic and persuade Gaz he can get in the England Euro's squad with a full season here. Don't fancy our chances.
But not sure now we have any other option?
I'm not sure there is anything we can do now other than hope against hope that we can sign him up for an extra year or two.
Having said all that its not that nobody has bid what we want, nobody has bid full stop. Not even a cheeky 7M. Coyle needs to try and work some magic and persuade Gaz he can get in the England Euro's squad with a full season here. Don't fancy our chances.
But not sure now we have any other option?
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
except selling him to arsenal or liverpool....BWFC_Insane wrote:We should have sold Cahill last summer or last January if we could. Given we're where we are....
I'm not sure there is anything we can do now other than hope against hope that we can sign him up for an extra year or two.
Having said all that its not that nobody has bid what we want, nobody has bid full stop. Not even a cheeky 7M. Coyle needs to try and work some magic and persuade Gaz he can get in the England Euro's squad with a full season here. Don't fancy our chances.
But not sure now we have any other option?
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
don't panic... it's just a bit of scots-teasing... Kenny likes it when Coyle playes hard-to-get...jimbo_bwfc wrote:Coyle puts the Liverpool rumours to bed and calls it "irresponsible journalism".
Play the fecking game Coyle! After putting all these 30m...err 25m...I meant 20m...ok,ok 17m pricetags on his head, he now seems to be giving daily announcements about no-one bidding for Cahill.
Either keep quiet or play it subtle. No-one's going to bid anything more than 6-7M if they realise they don't have to.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1967
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
It took the BBC radio around 2 or 3 days to report the Chungy injury, they've jumped on this Coyle denial straight away because it's connected to Liverpool and he uses sexy language: "irresponsible journalism".
Yet another non-story.
Yet another non-story.
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 21 guests