Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:33 am

jimbo_bwfc wrote:Liverpool are the latest club in the mix.

Apparently Daily Mail going big on the story, their backpage. Story from Dom King, former Liverpool Echo writer, whether that means he has his ear any closer to the wall I've no idea, but I certainly hope someone comes in and bids for him.

Liverpool might be ideal if they throw N'Gog into the deal, saves us having to fork out money for a striker. Wouldn't mind getting Danny Wilson in on the act too, on loan.
hmmm... this sounds quite likely... (they have been shipping preseason goals) - I was half asleep - but I also heartd this rumoured on R5 this morning in one of their short sports bulletins.. if it's gonna happenm - soonr rather than later, please.

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:44 am

jimbo_bwfc wrote:Liverpool are the latest club in the mix.

Apparently Daily Mail going big on the story, their backpage. Story from Dom King, former Liverpool Echo writer, whether that means he has his ear any closer to the wall I've no idea, but I certainly hope someone comes in and bids for him.

Liverpool might be ideal if they throw N'Gog into the deal, saves us having to fork out money for a striker. Wouldn't mind getting Danny Wilson in on the act too, on loan.

oooooooooooh no

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:06 am

I reckon if we pulled in 10M+ Coyle would be on the phone straight away with City to try and bring in Onouha. I'd hope so anyway.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:07 am

He (unsurprisingly) turned QPR down - reckon he'd move to us too.

Would be delighted with that Ngog deal.

Beefheart
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2918
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:36 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Beefheart » Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:16 am

If Liverpool are going to be in it's a shame he has a release clause, otherwise I'm sure they'd bid 20m.

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:16 am

It's gotten to the stage now where each new Gary Cahill rumour is just 'mehhhh'...but if there's any substance in it then i hope it gets done quickly.

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:16 am

Maybe they will anyway 8)

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31639
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:51 am

Liverpool spent a lot early on, which could mean they have a bottomless pit or they burned through a budget. I get the feeling it's more of the latter, although if they're being poop in pre-season they might persuade John W Henry's Fenway Sports Group to sub them some money.

They certainly do need a centre-half, preferably a ball-player, and I've said for a while that Cahill fits the bill. And although (part-)swaps are, as many have said, much harder to complete over here, it probably helps that they have a property (Ngog) that we'd want. As a side issue they have a few youngsters Dalglish blooded last season who might be further from the first team after the influx, so it's not far-fetched to imagine they might be the latest to send a sapling to the Coyle Finishing School.

Onuoha would be a possibility - more so than a month ago when he apparently turned us down, 'cos since then he's been ignored by Mancini, left out of the club's trips to the USA and Dublin – and we're certainly a better prospect for him than QPR. However, a bent-nosed problem looms in the north-east: backed by money from Darren Bent's departure, Jordan Henderson's overvaluation and Ellis Short's back pocket – and hankering for more signings after an early-summer splurge on Wes Brown, John O'Shea, Seb Larsson, Conor Wickham, Craig Gardner, David Vaughan and Keiren Westwood – Steve Bruce has been on SSN parping on about watching the City situation (the Cituation?) and having designs on SWP and Onouha, the defender having had a reasonably successful loan there last season.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:02 am

I'm not sure, after signing Mears (thus freeing up Ricketts), that we're as hell bent on finding a Gary replacement. I've often wondered whether Wheater was signed in anticipation of a bid last January.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31639
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:05 am

Lord Kangana wrote:I'm not sure, after signing Mears (thus freeing up Ricketts), that we're as hell bent on finding a Gary replacement. I've often wondered whether Wheater was signed in anticipation of a bid last January.
Yeah, Wheater was probably signed with half an eye on Cahill's departure. But I'd be shocked and scared if we didn't get one in when Gaz leaves. It might be back up to Boro for yon Aussie...

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:07 am

Wouldn't be unhappy with that.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:08 am

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:I'm not sure, after signing Mears (thus freeing up Ricketts), that we're as hell bent on finding a Gary replacement. I've often wondered whether Wheater was signed in anticipation of a bid last January.
Yeah, Wheater was probably signed with half an eye on Cahill's departure. But I'd be shocked and scared if we didn't get one in when Gaz leaves. It might be back up to Boro for yon Aussie...

didn't Boro "slap" a £900million transfer valuation on him?

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:03 am

Coyle puts the Liverpool rumours to bed and calls it "irresponsible journalism".

Play the fecking game Coyle! After putting all these 30m...err 25m...I meant 20m...ok,ok 17m pricetags on his head, he now seems to be giving daily announcements about no-one bidding for Cahill.

Either keep quiet or play it subtle. No-one's going to bid anything more than 6-7M if they realise they don't have to.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:05 am

jimbo_bwfc wrote:Coyle puts the Liverpool rumours to bed and calls it "irresponsible journalism".

Play the fecking game Coyle! After putting all these 30m...err 25m...I meant 20m...ok,ok 17m pricetags on his head, he now seems to be giving daily announcements about no-one bidding for Cahill.

Either keep quiet or play it subtle. No-one's going to bid anything more than 6-7M if they realise he's not worth it.
Fixed 8)

BWFC_Wyles
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 805
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:08 pm
Location: Burnden Terrace

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Wyles » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:47 am

I just wish someone would bid!! Getting tired of it now. Coyle has played it all wrong. Clubs know they don't have to bid until the last few days in August....leaving us completely on our arse!!
"Anything else you'd like? How about real lead in the radiation shields? Urinal cakes, maybe?"

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:49 am

Lofthouse Lower wrote:
jimbo_bwfc wrote:Coyle puts the Liverpool rumours to bed and calls it "irresponsible journalism".

Play the fecking game Coyle! After putting all these 30m...err 25m...I meant 20m...ok,ok 17m pricetags on his head, he now seems to be giving daily announcements about no-one bidding for Cahill.

Either keep quiet or play it subtle. No-one's going to bid anything more than 6-7M if they realise he's not worth it.
Fixed 8)
I'm not convinced he's a 20M player either, but I'd say he's worth 10M of anyone's money when you consider how much teams at the top have paid for absolute shite.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38826
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:57 am

We should have sold Cahill last summer or last January if we could. Given we're where we are....

I'm not sure there is anything we can do now other than hope against hope that we can sign him up for an extra year or two.

Having said all that its not that nobody has bid what we want, nobody has bid full stop. Not even a cheeky 7M. Coyle needs to try and work some magic and persuade Gaz he can get in the England Euro's squad with a full season here. Don't fancy our chances.

But not sure now we have any other option?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:01 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:We should have sold Cahill last summer or last January if we could. Given we're where we are....

I'm not sure there is anything we can do now other than hope against hope that we can sign him up for an extra year or two.

Having said all that its not that nobody has bid what we want, nobody has bid full stop. Not even a cheeky 7M. Coyle needs to try and work some magic and persuade Gaz he can get in the England Euro's squad with a full season here. Don't fancy our chances.

But not sure now we have any other option?
except selling him to arsenal or liverpool....

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:12 pm

jimbo_bwfc wrote:Coyle puts the Liverpool rumours to bed and calls it "irresponsible journalism".

Play the fecking game Coyle! After putting all these 30m...err 25m...I meant 20m...ok,ok 17m pricetags on his head, he now seems to be giving daily announcements about no-one bidding for Cahill.

Either keep quiet or play it subtle. No-one's going to bid anything more than 6-7M if they realise they don't have to.
don't panic... it's just a bit of scots-teasing... Kenny likes it when Coyle playes hard-to-get...

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:13 pm

It took the BBC radio around 2 or 3 days to report the Chungy injury, they've jumped on this Coyle denial straight away because it's connected to Liverpool and he uses sexy language: "irresponsible journalism".

Yet another non-story.
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests