Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:24 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:Coyle thinks Knight is good....

Good point CAPS

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:30 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:Coyle thinks Knight is good....
Didn't say he was right, and we don't know if he thinks Knight is good, he might just think he's a better bet than Wheater!

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:31 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Coyle thinks Knight is good....
Didn't say he was right, and we don't know if he thinks Knight is good, he might just think he's a better bet than Wheater!
Then why sign Wheater? Coyle always bangs on about improving the squad...............

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:33 pm

To be fair, Wheater just needs to be better than the worst CB in the squad to improve it

However, I'd love to know whether Wheater regrets his move, yet
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:38 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:To be fair, Wheater just needs to be better than the worst CB in the squad to improve it

However, I'd love to know whether Wheater regrets his move, yet
Thought that was Knight?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:39 pm

Hoboh wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Coyle thinks Knight is good....
Didn't say he was right, and we don't know if he thinks Knight is good, he might just think he's a better bet than Wheater!
Then why sign Wheater? Coyle always bangs on about improving the squad...............
Don't know, I suspect that he sees Wheater as a younger player who could be developed over time. Wheater primarily signed because we were selling AOB and needed some cover! Knight was also less error prone in that period IIRC!

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:57 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Coyle thinks Knight is good....
Didn't say he was right, and we don't know if he thinks Knight is good, he might just think he's a better bet than Wheater!
Then why sign Wheater? Coyle always bangs on about improving the squad...............
Don't know, I suspect that he sees Wheater as a younger player who could be developed over time. Wheater primarily signed because we were selling AOB and needed some cover! Knight was also less error prone in that period IIRC!
I'd be the last person to defend Knight (especially after watching the Liverpool game) but it did seem to me that Knight tended to play much better last season when he was not paired with Cahill (Cahill being out through injury, suspension, etc.). Wishful thinking perhaps.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

kick ass koala
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Asgard

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by kick ass koala » Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:16 pm

Is williams a no go ? I know they rejected our first move for him but if we sell cahill maybe we can afford a higher bid.

Id take him over any of the replacements mentioned so far. At this rate we will be playing Bogdan at centre back.
-------------------------------------
Smite me oh mighty smiter !

malcd1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3608
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:33 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by malcd1 » Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:17 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Coyle thinks Knight is good....
Didn't say he was right, and we don't know if he thinks Knight is good, he might just think he's a better bet than Wheater!
Then why sign Wheater? Coyle always bangs on about improving the squad...............
Don't know, I suspect that he sees Wheater as a younger player who could be developed over time. Wheater primarily signed because we were selling AOB and needed some cover! Knight was also less error prone in that period IIRC!
I'd be the last person to defend Knight (especially after watching the Liverpool game) but it did seem to me that Knight tended to play much better last season when he was not paired with Cahill (Cahill being out through injury, suspension, etc.). Wishful thinking perhaps.
Keep clutching at those straws Monty.

I thought Knight got a bit of bad press with the Bolton fans but after the last two games I now know I was wrong. Sorry.
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:18 pm

Williams?
Sto ut Serviam

malcd1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3608
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:33 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by malcd1 » Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:20 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:Williams?
As in Rhys from Boro?
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:25 pm

Ah, will be

Not sure why he'd be any better than Wheater, mind
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:42 pm

malcd1 wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote: Don't know, I suspect that he sees Wheater as a younger player who could be developed over time. Wheater primarily signed because we were selling AOB and needed some cover! Knight was also less error prone in that period IIRC!
I'd be the last person to defend Knight (especially after watching the Liverpool game) but it did seem to me that Knight tended to play much better last season when he was not paired with Cahill (Cahill being out through injury, suspension, etc.). Wishful thinking perhaps.
Keep clutching at those straws Monty.

I thought Knight got a bit of bad press with the Bolton fans but after the last two games I now know I was wrong. Sorry.
:D I certainly can't argue on the strength of the last two games! It was just he seemed to take more responsibility and play better when he was the 'senior' partner. Of course it was all a long time ago. Seeing him out-jumped by relative midgets and given the runaround when imitating a pylon was sobering.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by officer_dibble » Mon Aug 29, 2011 3:52 pm

Coyles spent £5m on defenders and not improved the defense; just the squad. Whether its personnel or tactics that is THE question for Owen as far as I'm concerned.

wanderers_on_tour
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1317
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by wanderers_on_tour » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:30 pm

QPR have bidded for Onuoha

spikeykev
Promising
Promising
Posts: 313
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:39 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by spikeykev » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:32 pm

wanderers_on_tour wrote:QPR have bidded for Onuoha
wankers, they will bid for n'gog next...

Wandering Willy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Wandering Willy » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:36 pm

Can't see anyone under the age of 29 going to QPR.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Bruce Rioja » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:40 pm

Talk of Th'Arse being in for Alex now, too.

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 78,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
May the bridges I burn light your way

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:42 pm

It doesn't say owt of the sort, actually
Sto ut Serviam

Wandering Willy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Wandering Willy » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:46 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:Talk of Th'Arse being in for Alex now, too.

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 78,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Aye - that was rumoured on Saturday too but I didn't give it much credence due to the source.

http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/873701-ars ... z1WFdJu2iW

Before yesterday's game. Not sure Chelsea will sell to Arsenal.

Fits in with my top secret Cahill to Chelsea theory though.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], DJBlu, TANGODANCER and 45 guests