Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
spikeykev
Promising
Promising
Posts: 313
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:39 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by spikeykev » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:46 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:Talk of Th'Arse being in for Alex now, too.

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 78,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Alan Nixon
@reluctantnicko Alan Nixon
@Bennyy156 Think the story was planted to scare Bolton. Didn't work.

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by plymouth wanderer » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:51 pm

thank fvck for that i shat myself
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by TKIZ! » Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:55 pm

Couldn't give a feck who they are in for. If we don't sell him then we get Cahill till at least the end of the season. If we do sell him then we make some money and can sign a few players
Pfffft.

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:56 pm

http://www.thenational.ae/sport/footbal ... line-looms" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Not sure about the validity of this, he's claiming actual bid was 8m + 1m after 50 games + 2m more potentially.

That's by the by, the bit I'm interested in is the further one year option. Would that mean the club can enforce an extra year without Cahill's agreement? Surely not?
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by TKIZ! » Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:59 pm

jimbo_bwfc wrote:http://www.thenational.ae/sport/footbal ... line-looms

Not sure about the validity of this, he's claiming actual bid was 8m + 1m after 50 games + 2m more potentially.

That's by the by, the bit I'm interested in is the further one year option. Would that mean the club can enforce an extra year without Cahill's agreement? Surely not?
Can't see us going for that, can't see Cahill go for that one year option either
Pfffft.

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:00 pm

A writer from the times said that was the original offer, the one cited as "derisory" and reported at £6m...

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by TKIZ! » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:02 pm

hisroyalgingerness wrote:A writer from the times said that was the original offer, the one cited as "derisory" and reported at £6m...
Ahhh right. Still a bit of a crap offer even when you read the add ons
Pfffft.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:03 pm

hisroyalgingerness wrote:A writer from the times said that was the original offer, the one cited as "derisory" and reported at £6m...
6 or 8 it's still a joke of an offer!

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by TKIZ! » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:10 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
hisroyalgingerness wrote:A writer from the times said that was the original offer, the one cited as "derisory" and reported at £6m...
6 or 8 it's still a joke of an offer!
Aye, is the Alex thing supposed to worry us into selling Cahill for a ridiculously low price?
Pfffft.

Wandering Willy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Wandering Willy » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:16 pm

jimbo_bwfc wrote:http://www.thenational.ae/sport/footbal ... line-looms

Not sure about the validity of this, he's claiming actual bid was 8m + 1m after 50 games + 2m more potentially.

That's by the by, the bit I'm interested in is the further one year option. Would that mean the club can enforce an extra year without Cahill's agreement? Surely not?
Often wondered whether something like this would exist ie if the release amount is not triggered then we can extend for a year so as to not lose out on a free.

Seems nuts that GC would agree to that now, but at the time it was signed things may have looked very different.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:26 pm

TKIZ! wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
hisroyalgingerness wrote:A writer from the times said that was the original offer, the one cited as "derisory" and reported at £6m...
6 or 8 it's still a joke of an offer!
Aye, is the Alex thing supposed to worry us into selling Cahill for a ridiculously low price?
Yes, but remember, if we don't want to sell Cahill, we don't have to :wink:

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:40 pm

True HRG, I'm relaxed either way.

Wheater, Knight, Steinnson, Robbo, Boyata, Ricketts, Riley, and maybe Connolly, can all play in the first team that's 8! If we get another body in that'll be 9 and I haven't even counted Alonso or Mears :)
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:41 pm

Armchair Wanderer wrote:True HRG, I'm relaxed either way.

Wheater, Knight, Steinnson, Robbo, Boyata, Ricketts, Riley, and maybe Connolly, can all play in the first team that's 8! If we get another body in that'll be 9 and I haven't even counted Alonso or Mears :)
...or ricardo...

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:43 pm

thebish wrote:
Armchair Wanderer wrote:True HRG, I'm relaxed either way.

Wheater, Knight, Steinnson, Robbo, Boyata, Ricketts, Riley, and maybe Connolly, can all play in the first team that's 8! If we get another body in that'll be 9 and I haven't even counted Alonso or Mears :)
...or ricardo...
:oops:
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Tue Aug 30, 2011 9:53 am

Today's Metro reckons Spurs are back in the hat for our Gary after shipping 5 goals over the weekend....

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:36 am

Arsenal signed Per Mertesacker according to L'Equipe.

Big clumsy feck*. (Very) rich man's Zat Knight.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:36 am

:lol: he's fu cking rubbish

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Tue Aug 30, 2011 1:47 pm

Second bid "way short" of 12m rejected according to The Telegraph.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... dical.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Also suggests we'd go for Dann if we sold Cahill. Would be very happy with all that happening. Birmingham are desperate for a sale.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Aug 30, 2011 1:50 pm

Full text, for those not willing to follow jimbo's lies
Arsène Wenger made his original offer for Cahill, a long-term target, last week but saw a bid of just £6 million rejected out of hand by their Premier League rivals. Though the defender has a £17 million buy-out clause in his contract, Coyle would accept a compromise figure of around £12 million.

The Scot is adamant he will not deviate from that amount, though – insisting after Saturday’s defeat at Anfield that he would not “buckle” despite pressure from Arsenal – and sources at Bolton feel it is now unlikely Wenger will meet their asking price.

Coyle has lined up Scott Dann, the Birmingham centre back, as a replacement for Cahill should the former Aston Villa player leave. Dann is also thought to be a target for Blackburn, another club affected by Wenger’s desperate need for defensive reinforcements.
Dann is OK, nowt special

mighty_whites
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:22 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by mighty_whites » Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:04 pm

I reckon that Spurs going to put in bid of player plus cash deal for Cahill. Maybe Bentley and hopefull Crouch or Pav with some cash so we can get Onouha?? I'd also sack off that lanky piece of shit Zat Knight and have Wheater and onouha cb's and boyata rb with alonso when fit lb decent defence.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], irie Cee Bee and 35 guests