Time to go

Worthy4England · Post by **Worthy4England** » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:27 pm

But we're not going to give him a bottomless pit, so faring poorly on one won't be an issue and therefore no precedent to follow.

We'd give him bugger all, like he had at Blackburn, which there is s precedent for.

Giving OC any amount of money, if he sets the team up like a clueless bugger won't help either.

Of the two I think Hughes would be more likely to have a clue than OC. Whether this team could play the "Hughes" style I very much doubt. I can't see Petrov and Eagles suddenly morphing into Chopper Harris.

Either way Hughes was just one suggestion. From most of the starting formations we've had this season, McLaren has more clue.

officer_dibble · Post by **officer_dibble** » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:28 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:
Harry Genshaw wrote:As LK pointed out, we spent 5hitloads in attracting the in-demand managerial thoroughbred that was Gary Megson.
And, as he didn't point out, we spent more getting Coyle and his useless mates

Is that from the accounts then or are you making it up? And how much did it cost to get rid of MEgson and his mongy mates? The wooden fella who had about 6 hours in charge of southampton was my favourite. Still he's Brian Clough compared to Sandy friggin Stewart it would seem.

Wandering Willy · Post by **Wandering Willy** » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:32 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Either way Hughes was just one suggestion. From most of the starting formations we've had this season, McLaren has more clue.

The bloke who builds cars?

Worthy4England · Post by **Worthy4England** » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:38 pm

Wandering Willy wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
Either way Hughes was just one suggestion. From most of the starting formations we've had this season, McLaren has more clue.
The bloke who builds cars?

Yes - I reckon he'd have more clue too.

Prufrock · Post by **Prufrock** » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:44 pm

Ugh- stop being so constantly negative, you.

Lord Kangana · Post by **Lord Kangana** » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:51 pm

Just wait 'til they get their way and Peter Reid arrives.

Worthy4England · Post by **Worthy4England** » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:53 pm

Prufrock wrote:Ugh- stop being so constantly negative, you.

Well....

OK then we could get 18 points from our next 6 games

CAPSLOCK · Post by **CAPSLOCK** » Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:19 am

officer_dibble wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:And, as he didn't point out, we spent more getting Coyle and his useless mates
Is that from the accounts then or are you making it up?

The compo for TeamCoyle was finally settled in the summer

The amount was anything between nowt and 3 million quid depending on how the accounts value the transfer of the registrations of Eagles and Mears

jmjhb · Post by **jmjhb** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:43 pm

So then, how many Coyle 'in'-ers have we got left now?

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:00 pm

it'll be reet...

no it fecking won't!!!!!!

HMX · Post by **HMX** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:01 pm

Was on the fence. Starting to fall towards the Coyle-out side.

But still.. who can we get who will improve us? That's what matters.

Whookam · Post by **Whookam** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:02 pm

HMX wrote:Was on the fence. Starting to fall towards the Coyle-out side.

But still.. who can we get who will improve us? That's what matters.

It's hard to get much worse.

tripod · Post by **tripod** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:04 pm

HMX wrote:Was on the fence. Starting to fall towards the Coyle-out side.

But still.. who can we get who will improve us? That's what matters.

This

Turkish Trotter · Post by **Turkish Trotter** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:05 pm

thebish wrote:it'll be reet...

no it fecking won't!!!!!!

Correct,
though which league we're in when it is concerns me.

2399 · Post by **2399** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:10 pm

thebish wrote:it'll be reet...

(white color removed) no it fecking won't!!!!!![/color]

fixed for Turkish Trotter

I just Voted

a1 · Post by a1 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:11 pm

HMX wrote:Was on the fence. Starting to fall towards the Coyle-out side.

But still.. who can we get who will improve us? That's what matters.

roy mcfarland

:/

Turkish Trotter · Post by **Turkish Trotter** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:22 pm

Megson P 98 W 27 D 26 L 45
Coyle P 84 W 29 D 15 L 40

Almost as many losses in less games, Much better win ratio, but why can we not grind out draws. It seems like we go out with a shit or bust attitude and when we go a goal down cannot change to a plan B to get back in the game.

Didn't think I would, but am drifting to the Must Go camp.

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:23 pm

Miserable again.

Coyle needs to go, sorry but the only chance we have is a change!

Mixu Fattypieman · Post by **Mixu Fattypieman** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:25 pm

Whilst there's no doubt we've had some woeful luck this season what with injuries, fixture lists, possibly arguable red cards (clutches at straws) its now got the point where I find it impossible to see how Coyle can turn it round.

He's tried different formations, different personnel. His main signing of the summer can't get a game in a poor team.

We've had 2 'turning the corner' victories where we haven't turned the corner. In both we scored early (and played poor teams also).

We just look so brittle and weak and soft and naive and clueless. And I can't see how thats going to change soon, after all we've been like this for months now.

2399 · Post by **2399** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:26 pm

Someone should make a new poll so everyone can vote again!!

Time to go

Should we get rid of Owen Coyle?

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go

Re: Time to go back to the polls

Who is online

Connect with your social network account

Should we get rid of Owen Coyle?

Who is online