Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

Should he stay or should he go?

He should be given more time (indefinite)
26
28%
He should be given until Christmas
24
26%
He should be given a couple more games
12
13%
He should be sacked immediately
32
34%
 
Total votes: 94

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:39 pm

He's got a contract of employment. I'd say he's just in the same position as anyone else with one of those.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by Prufrock » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:00 pm

No expert on constructive dismissal, I think it would be an issue best handled by our resident Welsh clown (go on, bite) but I'm fairly sure there is an unfairness aspect that must be proven for 'constructive dismissal'. Might be all right in the terms the General suggests. No different than bringing in training on the job? Not sure you could 'construct' that the club were trying to dismiss him if they intended him to be in sole charge next year?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:12 pm

Depends how beligerent he's feeling, how panicky Big Phil is, or indeed whats in that contract.

At the moment, goodwill is on our side, so an acrimonious divorce like last time isn't on the cards. However, I'm sure theres a an inverse proportion graph of diminishing amounts of time and increasing potential for a nasty outcome.

If they're going to do it, it needs to be quick and clean. But we've come this far, I'm not so certain there as many options on the board's table as people here would like. And he's out of contract come seasons end. If they had the funds it would better serve the situation to just put him on gardening leave. I doubt we'll hear the childish carping at the end of it that we did last time round.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38813
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:31 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Depends how beligerent he's feeling, how panicky Big Phil is, or indeed whats in that contract.

At the moment, goodwill is on our side, so an acrimonious divorce like last time isn't on the cards. However, I'm sure theres a an inverse proportion graph of diminishing amounts of time and increasing potential for a nasty outcome.

If they're going to do it, it needs to be quick and clean. But we've come this far, I'm not so certain there as many options on the board's table as people here would like. And he's out of contract come seasons end. If they had the funds it would better serve the situation to just put him on gardening leave. I doubt we'll hear the childish carping at the end of it that we did last time round.
There'd be no need for him to. Coyle has had great support. Can't complain about that.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:36 pm

Indeed, its been a very reciprocal relationship. No need to spoil it later by making things up.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38813
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:37 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Indeed, its been a very reciprocal relationship. No need to spoil it later by making things up.
Well he wasn't booed before he'd had a day inside the club.

Coyle can't complain about the fans.

I think given the money we pay, we have every right to complain about his performance!

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:39 pm

Indeed. So I'll reiterate that I don't think he'll react like a spoilt brat if the seemingly inevitable happens.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38813
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:44 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Indeed. So I'll reiterate that I don't think he'll react like a spoilt brat if the seemingly inevitable happens.
I think he will be here till season end then skulk away leaving us to clear up the mess!

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by boltonboris » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:52 am

I'm not sure there's a more boring, repetetitive poster in the whole of internetsland than you BWFCi
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by CAPSLOCK » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:06 am

boltonboris wrote:I'm not sure there's a more boring, repetetitive poster in the whole of internetsland than you BWFCi
I can think of one
Sto ut Serviam

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by CAPSLOCK » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:06 am

boltonboris wrote:I'm not sure there's a more boring, repetetitive poster in the whole of internetsland than you BWFCi
I can think of one
Sto ut Serviam

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by CAPSLOCK » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:06 am

boltonboris wrote:I'm not sure there's a more boring, repetetitive poster in the whole of internetsland than you BWFCi
I can think of one
Sto ut Serviam

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by boltonboris » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:08 am

So you said
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38813
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:42 am

boltonboris wrote:I'm not sure there's a more boring, repetetitive poster in the whole of internetsland than you BWFCi
Charmed I'm sure.

But no worries, I always look out for your offerings on here with a tingling mixture of excitement and anticipation just to see what gems you are going to come up with next.......

C'est la vie

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by boltonboris » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:57 am

See what I mean :zzz:
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38813
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:06 am

boltonboris wrote:See what I mean :zzz:
:lol: Touche................

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:23 am

Do you always touche men when they're asleep..?

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31613
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:25 pm

thebish wrote:
boltonboris wrote:Coyle won't have that though.. Undermining him, is practically sacking him.
constructive dismissal?? - worked when they appointed Venables alongside Shteve at Boro, though...
Venables was parachuted in to help Bryan Robson, not Steve McClaren, in winter 2000/01. Boro stayed up (in 14th), and both left the following summer. They were replaced by McClaren, who was there for five seasons in which Boro finished 12th, 11th, 11th (with a League Cup win), 7th and 14th (with a UEFA Cup final). He did that all by himself, and without the wedge afforded his predecessor.

Robson happily accepted help, but that would be up to the manager. If BWFC started leaning on Coyle to get some help in (or basically f*ck off), it would be very interesting to see which way OC went. Loyal to the bitter end?

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by Bruce Rioja » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:30 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Venables was parachuted in to help Bryan Robson
A somewhat ostentatious arrival! :shock:
May the bridges I burn light your way

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: Coyle - Time to go? [post-Everton]

Post by William the White » Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:05 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Venables was parachuted in to help Bryan Robson
A somewhat ostentatious arrival! :shock:
El Tel rarely shy and retiring though...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests