Owen Coyle

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Hoboh » Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:50 pm

Reverting back to type again Coyle? Kevin feckin Davies on, Moo off, 4-4-2 and loose oh Coyle I so wanted to believe you'd learned, prick!

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by officer_dibble » Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:52 pm

got it wrong today, big time

mears starting
subbing moo, and eagles
bringing davies on and persisting with the tippy tappy shit

back to fecking type

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:52 pm

Hoboh wrote:Reverting back to type again Coyle? Kevin feckin Davies on, Moo off, 4-4-2 and loose oh Coyle I so wanted to believe you'd learned, prick!
It's so frustrating when your manager is holding the players back through ineptitude.

There was a point on offer today simply by seeing out the game, perhaps even nicking it off a set piece late on.

There was absolutely no logic to change that. None at all. And you could see it happening as soon as he did, as every fooker said on here.

Gail Platz
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 973
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Gail Platz » Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:55 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Reverting back to type again Coyle? Kevin feckin Davies on, Moo off, 4-4-2 and loose oh Coyle I so wanted to believe you'd learned, prick!
It's so frustrating when your manager is holding the players back through ineptitude.

There was a point on offer today simply by seeing out the game, perhaps even nicking it off a set piece late on.

There was absolutely no logic to change that. None at all. And you could see it happening as soon as he did, as every fooker said on here.
Here we go again. How long are we getting this for, the evening? The week? Bellend.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:57 pm

Gail Platz wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Reverting back to type again Coyle? Kevin feckin Davies on, Moo off, 4-4-2 and loose oh Coyle I so wanted to believe you'd learned, prick!
It's so frustrating when your manager is holding the players back through ineptitude.

There was a point on offer today simply by seeing out the game, perhaps even nicking it off a set piece late on.

There was absolutely no logic to change that. None at all. And you could see it happening as soon as he did, as every fooker said on here.
Here we go again. How long are we getting this for, the evening? The week? Bellend.
Personal abuse for expressing an opinion. Classy.

Perhaps you could explain why we changed system and what effect it had? Rather than resorting to abuse. Debate.....

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Hoboh » Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:59 pm

Gail Platz wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Reverting back to type again Coyle? Kevin feckin Davies on, Moo off, 4-4-2 and loose oh Coyle I so wanted to believe you'd learned, prick!
It's so frustrating when your manager is holding the players back through ineptitude.

There was a point on offer today simply by seeing out the game, perhaps even nicking it off a set piece late on.

There was absolutely no logic to change that. None at all. And you could see it happening as soon as he did, as every fooker said on here.
Here we go again. How long are we getting this for, the evening? The week? Bellend.
Go dunk your head, your meaningfull comment all afternoon was to have a go at a ten min sub!
Coyle fecked this game up, Petrov was having a bad day he could have stuck Haggler out wide, he's two footed and fast which against a makeshift defence as they had would have worried them more than a carthorse!

Verbal
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Silly London

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Verbal » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:00 pm

Gonna shut down the internet for the weekend, me thinks.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."

"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."

Gail Platz
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 973
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Gail Platz » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:01 pm

Hoboh wrote:
Gail Platz wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Reverting back to type again Coyle? Kevin feckin Davies on, Moo off, 4-4-2 and loose oh Coyle I so wanted to believe you'd learned, prick!
It's so frustrating when your manager is holding the players back through ineptitude.

There was a point on offer today simply by seeing out the game, perhaps even nicking it off a set piece late on.

There was absolutely no logic to change that. None at all. And you could see it happening as soon as he did, as every fooker said on here.
Here we go again. How long are we getting this for, the evening? The week? Bellend.
Go dunk your head, your meaningfull comment all afternoon was to have a go at a ten min sub!
Coyle fecked this game up, Petrov was having a bad day he could have stuck Haggler out wide, he's two footed and fast which against a makeshift defence as they had would have worried them more than a carthorse!
Two centre halves come off and they stick a short arse in there instead, which cries out for Davies to be brought on. Davies comes on to cause problems and win headers, which he did. It was a gamble that didn't pay off.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Hoboh » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:04 pm

Gail Platz wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Gail Platz wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Reverting back to type again Coyle? Kevin feckin Davies on, Moo off, 4-4-2 and loose oh Coyle I so wanted to believe you'd learned, prick!
It's so frustrating when your manager is holding the players back through ineptitude.

There was a point on offer today simply by seeing out the game, perhaps even nicking it off a set piece late on.

There was absolutely no logic to change that. None at all. And you could see it happening as soon as he did, as every fooker said on here.
Here we go again. How long are we getting this for, the evening? The week? Bellend.
Go dunk your head, your meaningfull comment all afternoon was to have a go at a ten min sub!
Coyle fecked this game up, Petrov was having a bad day he could have stuck Haggler out wide, he's two footed and fast which against a makeshift defence as they had would have worried them more than a carthorse!
Two centre halves come off and they stick a short arse in there instead, which cries out for Davies to be brought on. Davies comes on to cause problems and win headers, which he did. It was a gamble that didn't pay off.
If Davies headers went any where meaningful it would be ok but he is a feckin carthorse and lumping everything to him ain't worked all year so why revert to type? 4-4-2 only works with better players than we can afford

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:06 pm

Gail Platz wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Gail Platz wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Reverting back to type again Coyle? Kevin feckin Davies on, Moo off, 4-4-2 and loose oh Coyle I so wanted to believe you'd learned, prick!
It's so frustrating when your manager is holding the players back through ineptitude.

There was a point on offer today simply by seeing out the game, perhaps even nicking it off a set piece late on.

There was absolutely no logic to change that. None at all. And you could see it happening as soon as he did, as every fooker said on here.
Here we go again. How long are we getting this for, the evening? The week? Bellend.
Go dunk your head, your meaningfull comment all afternoon was to have a go at a ten min sub!
Coyle fecked this game up, Petrov was having a bad day he could have stuck Haggler out wide, he's two footed and fast which against a makeshift defence as they had would have worried them more than a carthorse!
Two centre halves come off and they stick a short arse in there instead, which cries out for Davies to be brought on. Davies comes on to cause problems and win headers, which he did. It was a gamble that didn't pay off.
1) therefore a gamble that backfired, so a bad mistake.

2) Davies could have come on without a system change.

3) he didn't cause any problems, we looked better before he came on. Far better.

4) a point would have kept the momentum going and been a good result, no need to fooking gamble from that position away from home!

Gail Platz
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 973
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Gail Platz » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:07 pm

Hoboh wrote:
If Davies headers went any where meaningful it would be ok but he is a feckin carthorse and lumping everything to him ain't worked all year so why revert to type? 4-4-2 only works with better players than we can afford
If you've seen my posts this season I'm probably the most anti-Davies person on here but for me it made sense to bring him on. As I say it was a gamble to take Muamba off and if anything, I'd probably rather have seen Ngog taken off and if nothing was happening still, take off a midfielder for Sordell later on in the game.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Hoboh » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:11 pm

Gail Platz wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
If Davies headers went any where meaningful it would be ok but he is a feckin carthorse and lumping everything to him ain't worked all year so why revert to type? 4-4-2 only works with better players than we can afford
If you've seen my posts this season I'm probably the most anti-Davies person on here but for me it made sense to bring him on. As I say it was a gamble to take Muamba off and if anything, I'd probably rather have seen Ngog taken off and if nothing was happening still, take off a midfielder for Sordell later on in the game.
See not hard when you think is it? :mrgreen: Haggler for N'gog should have been first sub really (or Petrov) The longer Davo sticks around the more Coyle will feck up!

newboy
Promising
Promising
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:21 pm

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by newboy » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:14 pm

A manager lives and dies by his substitutions taking Muamba off was a costly mistake unfortunately it's one he has made too often the lad's game is to break up play which he usually does quite well.Maybe not glamorous enough for Coyle's mindset of attractive attacking free flowing football.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:17 pm

Fecking twonk. Utterly his fault, despite Lee Mack making a f*ck up. Wants 'Unless we're losing, or one of them is dead, do not break up Coker and Moo' tattoing on his forehead. Pure ineptitude, and 99% of Bolton fans watching knew it.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by bobo the clown » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:24 pm

Prufrock wrote:Fecking twonk. Utterly his fault, despite Lee Mack making a f*ck up. Wants 'Unless we're losing, or one of them is dead, do not break up Coker and Moo' tattoing on his forehead. Pure ineptitude, and 99% of Bolton fans watching knew it.
I think I'd leave them on even if they were .... tell 'em it's just a flesh-wound or something.

It is staggering & utterly beyond belief that he does this.

Honestly it's his "take off Klas, bring on McCann" moment.


It's not just what Moo does, but what that allows others to do. Is this rocket science ??

Fckg, fckg, fckg wanker Coyle.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Jokers in White
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 6:50 pm
Location: The Abyss

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Jokers in White » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:25 pm

Hoboh wrote:
Gail Platz wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
If Davies headers went any where meaningful it would be ok but he is a feckin carthorse and lumping everything to him ain't worked all year so why revert to type? 4-4-2 only works with better players than we can afford
If you've seen my posts this season I'm probably the most anti-Davies person on here but for me it made sense to bring him on. As I say it was a gamble to take Muamba off and if anything, I'd probably rather have seen Ngog taken off and if nothing was happening still, take off a midfielder for Sordell later on in the game.
See not hard when you think is it? :mrgreen: Haggler for N'gog should have been first sub really (or Petrov) The longer Davo sticks around the more Coyle will feck up!
Haggler ha! should of come on earlier instead of K Davies, davo just hasn't got anything going for him anymore coyle needs a wake up call!
https://twitter.com/Chaddy_81" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

newboy
Promising
Promising
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:21 pm

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by newboy » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:40 pm

If it's not happening up front change it up front don't feck about with the midfield It's this constant substitution of Muamba that's cost us points this season a lesson Coyle seems incapable of learning.

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by officer_dibble » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:51 pm

or if you must go 442 take off the midfielder who cant play 442

Time after time after time

What feck* me off even more is we still tried to play it through midfield - we didnt even use davies for the job he came on for!

pillock!

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:56 pm

officer_dibble wrote:or if you must go 442 take off the midfielder who cant play 442

Time after time after time

What feck me off even more is we still tried to play it through midfield - we didnt even use davies for the job he came on for!

pillock!
Well can you see us actually training to play a formation that has us running onto knockdowns from Davo?

Almost the world's most pointless substitution.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Owen Coyle

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:00 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
officer_dibble wrote:or if you must go 442 take off the midfielder who cant play 442

Time after time after time

What feck me off even more is we still tried to play it through midfield - we didnt even use davies for the job he came on for!

pillock!
Well can you see us actually training to play a formation that has us running onto knockdowns from Davo?

Almost the world's most pointless substitution.

Pointless indeed.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 36 guests