Remaining fixtures
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34774
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
That sort of form over a season would probably get you into a European spot of some description.Peter Thompson wrote:5 wins out of 11 and against all the odds (shit manager, shit coaches, shit players) and we're staying up - 35 points will keep us up
Looking at the fixtures you would have to fancy us & Wolves (IMO QPR & B/burn have difficult run ins especially QPR) - therefore if we can't win 5 games out of our remaining fixtures then we fully deserve to go down and Coyle deserves to be sacked.
Saying that, winning 5 out of 11 against any opposition with this shower of shite somehow seems a very tall order
We seem to be a
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong
way off that sort of form...
Re: Remaining fixtures
2-0 Fulham, let's hope that's goodnight from Wolves.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:25 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
Wolves look pants at the back but quick going forward at times.
We look pants at the back and pants going forwards :-S
We look pants at the back and pants going forwards :-S
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38882
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
That Pogrebnyak at Fukham, scored 3 in three, didn't Megson try to sign him?
Looks like he'd have been the sort of player to sign to make an impact and help keep us up, and wasn't he free and has only signed till the end of the season?
Instead we spent money on a youngster who has barely played a minute, at a time we desperately need an impact from someone.
Looks like he'd have been the sort of player to sign to make an impact and help keep us up, and wasn't he free and has only signed till the end of the season?
Instead we spent money on a youngster who has barely played a minute, at a time we desperately need an impact from someone.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34774
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
Fairly sure we were linked with him at some point - although I can't recall who or when. Mind you turning down Modric because "he might be a bit lightweight" probably isn't looking like the best assessment of a player I've ever seen.BWFC_Insane wrote:That Pogrebnyak at Fukham, scored 3 in three, didn't Megson try to sign him?
Looks like he'd have been the sort of player to sign to make an impact and help keep us up, and wasn't he free and has only signed till the end of the season?
Instead we spent money on a youngster who has barely played a minute, at a time we desperately need an impact from someone.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
Wolves 4 0 down, Goal difference WILL come into it this season !!!!!
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:57 am
Re: Remaining fixtures
Another defining weekend next weekend in ther fight for survival with Wolves v Blackburn and us a QPR. Fulham winning 5 - 0 now so we've almost got GD parity with Wolves which could make the difference at the end of the season.
The Voice Of Reason
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:53 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
BWFC_Insane wrote:That Pogrebnyak at Fukham, scored 3 in three, didn't Megson try to sign him?
Looks like he'd have been the sort of player to sign to make an impact and help keep us up, and wasn't he free and has only signed till the end of the season?
Instead we spent money on a youngster who has barely played a minute, at a time we desperately need an impact from someone.
fairly unrelenting in your criticism of Coyle aren't you?
ever considered the likelihood that a spell in West London might have appeared a better prospect for the Russian?
"A child of five would understand this- send someone to fetch a child of five"
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... efault.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Just had ago on this and I see us getting out of it on Goal difference.(I've been harsh and see us with 29 points, lowest ever total to escape)
Wigan, QPR and Wolves(on goal difference) to go down !!!!!!!!!!!! COYWM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just had ago on this and I see us getting out of it on Goal difference.(I've been harsh and see us with 29 points, lowest ever total to escape)
Wigan, QPR and Wolves(on goal difference) to go down !!!!!!!!!!!! COYWM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34774
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
I didn't read that as a "Coyle was wrong not to sign Pogrebnyak" comment, rather that with our limited funds, and our league position, maybe spending the dough we did have on someone with a bit of experience might have been a better idea?lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:BWFC_Insane wrote:That Pogrebnyak at Fukham, scored 3 in three, didn't Megson try to sign him?
Looks like he'd have been the sort of player to sign to make an impact and help keep us up, and wasn't he free and has only signed till the end of the season?
Instead we spent money on a youngster who has barely played a minute, at a time we desperately need an impact from someone.
fairly unrelenting in your criticism of Coyle aren't you?
ever considered the likelihood that a spell in West London might have appeared a better prospect for the Russian?
We have currently spent £7.5m on two strikers this year (so not far off what our previous Manager spent on one), they've got 2 goals between them (albeit Sordell has only been here about as long as Pogrebnynyak has been at Fulham)
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:53 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
read it again.
the suggestion that because he was a free and therefore up for grabs is linked to Coyle's perceived profligacy in signing Sordell.
the word "instead" links the two otherwise unrelated statements.
the suggestion that because he was a free and therefore up for grabs is linked to Coyle's perceived profligacy in signing Sordell.
the word "instead" links the two otherwise unrelated statements.
"A child of five would understand this- send someone to fetch a child of five"
Re: Remaining fixtures
which is how I read it too...lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:read it again.
the suggestion that because he was a free and therefore up for grabs is linked to Coyle's perceived profligacy in signing Sordell.
the word "instead" links the two otherwise unrelated statements.
and - to be clear - Megson didn't sign him either!!
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34774
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
I readed it again.lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:read it again.
the suggestion that because he was a free and therefore up for grabs is linked to Coyle's perceived profligacy in signing Sordell.
the word "instead" links the two otherwise unrelated statements.
It says (to me) that he was the sort of player we should have tried to sign (rather than the actual player we should have signed) [as opposed to a 17 year old with no Prem experience]
Re: Remaining fixtures
"sort of player" means bollox! only actual players can be judged!Worthy4England wrote:I readed it again.lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:read it again.
the suggestion that because he was a free and therefore up for grabs is linked to Coyle's perceived profligacy in signing Sordell.
the word "instead" links the two otherwise unrelated statements.
It says (to me) that he was the sort of player we should have tried to sign (rather than the actual player we should have signed) [as opposed to a 17 year old with no Prem experience]
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34774
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
What are you on about?thebish wrote:"sort of player" means bollox! only actual players can be judged!Worthy4England wrote:I readed it again.lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:read it again.
the suggestion that because he was a free and therefore up for grabs is linked to Coyle's perceived profligacy in signing Sordell.
the word "instead" links the two otherwise unrelated statements.
It says (to me) that he was the sort of player we should have tried to sign (rather than the actual player we should have signed) [as opposed to a 17 year old with no Prem experience]
I was asked why I thought BWFCI hadn't said "we should have signed Pogrebnyak instead of Sordell", I responded that he hadn't said that, but rather that we should have signed someone like Pogrebnyak instead of Sordell. Someone like could ACTUALLY have been Pogrebnyak, but then again it could have been some other player that was a similar SORT OF PLAYER as Pogrebnyak.
It's not that difficult for a bright chap like yourself to follow.
Re: Remaining fixtures
I think it's quite clear - not too hard for a bright chap like yourself to follow!Worthy4England wrote:What are you on about?thebish wrote:"sort of player" means bollox! only actual players can be judged!Worthy4England wrote:I readed it again.lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:read it again.
the suggestion that because he was a free and therefore up for grabs is linked to Coyle's perceived profligacy in signing Sordell.
the word "instead" links the two otherwise unrelated statements.
It says (to me) that he was the sort of player we should have tried to sign (rather than the actual player we should have signed) [as opposed to a 17 year old with no Prem experience]
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34774
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Remaining fixtures
Good so you agree with me then. That's fine.thebish wrote:I think it's quite clear - not too hard for a bright chap like yourself to follow!Worthy4England wrote:What are you on about?thebish wrote:"sort of player" means bollox! only actual players can be judged!Worthy4England wrote:I readed it again.lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:read it again.
the suggestion that because he was a free and therefore up for grabs is linked to Coyle's perceived profligacy in signing Sordell.
the word "instead" links the two otherwise unrelated statements.
It says (to me) that he was the sort of player we should have tried to sign (rather than the actual player we should have signed) [as opposed to a 17 year old with no Prem experience]
Re: Remaining fixtures
Pogrebnyak actually has 5 goals from his 5 shots on target at fulham, lets hope its a freak start and that he cant hit a barn door when he comes to the bok
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Remaining fixtures
if only we had a player who could hit the back of the net with such regularity...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 25 guests