Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Locked
Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Lord Kangana » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:03 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:Yes this line of argument is pretty silly. We offered contracts to Elmander and Knight; they didn't want to sign them. According to Gartside, the Sampions Lig Basterds doubled Elmander’s salary. What can Coyle do about that?

The blame lies squarely with Megson and Gartside for signing players in their late 20’s for grossly inflated fees, and only tying them down for 3 years.
Not sure about that. Elmander was 27 when he signed here, about the same age as when Anelka was when he signed.

Elmander just was unlucky in his first season with stop start injuries, and then he just never got any real form. He showed the odd sign when Coyle first came in but never really ignited.

It's kind of one of those things. I do think we should have offered him what he wanted to stay and it still would have been miles cheaper than what weve done now, but of course it's easy to say that but who knows what ramifications that would have had when discussing deals with other existing players?
I don't think being dropped by the manager = unlucky. Anelka was a proven player at this level for the money, Elmander was a gamble that failed. 1-in-5 for a club record signing can in no way be considered a success. We'll just have to write it down to experience now.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by plymouth wanderer » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:09 am

Fvcking A
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Worthy4England » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:33 am

Lord Kangana wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:Yes this line of argument is pretty silly. We offered contracts to Elmander and Knight; they didn't want to sign them. According to Gartside, the Sampions Lig Basterds doubled Elmander’s salary. What can Coyle do about that?

The blame lies squarely with Megson and Gartside for signing players in their late 20’s for grossly inflated fees, and only tying them down for 3 years.
Not sure about that. Elmander was 27 when he signed here, about the same age as when Anelka was when he signed.

Elmander just was unlucky in his first season with stop start injuries, and then he just never got any real form. He showed the odd sign when Coyle first came in but never really ignited.

It's kind of one of those things. I do think we should have offered him what he wanted to stay and it still would have been miles cheaper than what weve done now, but of course it's easy to say that but who knows what ramifications that would have had when discussing deals with other existing players?
I don't think being dropped by the manager = unlucky. Anelka was a proven player at this level for the money, Elmander was a gamble that failed. 1-in-5 for a club record signing can in no way be considered a success. We'll just have to write it down to experience now.
Which is all good n well until you remember that N'gog is our 5th record signing...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38814
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by BWFC_Insane » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:38 am

Lord Kangana wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:Yes this line of argument is pretty silly. We offered contracts to Elmander and Knight; they didn't want to sign them. According to Gartside, the Sampions Lig Basterds doubled Elmander’s salary. What can Coyle do about that?

The blame lies squarely with Megson and Gartside for signing players in their late 20’s for grossly inflated fees, and only tying them down for 3 years.
Not sure about that. Elmander was 27 when he signed here, about the same age as when Anelka was when he signed.

Elmander just was unlucky in his first season with stop start injuries, and then he just never got any real form. He showed the odd sign when Coyle first came in but never really ignited.

It's kind of one of those things. I do think we should have offered him what he wanted to stay and it still would have been miles cheaper than what weve done now, but of course it's easy to say that but who knows what ramifications that would have had when discussing deals with other existing players?
I don't think being dropped by the manager = unlucky. Anelka was a proven player at this level for the money, Elmander was a gamble that failed. 1-in-5 for a club record signing can in no way be considered a success. We'll just have to write it down to experience now.
Yep but as I said his first season he scored in the opening game, looked bright then got injured the game after and was out for several weeks and it was stop start. Clearly a confidence player and he never really got going till his third season here when he showed why he was our record signing and ended top scorer.

Certainly much less of a disaster than the 7m quid spent on Ngog and Sordell if you take a snapshot of it at this moment in time.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Lord Kangana » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:39 am

At less than half the amount.

So, with your wizzo bang figures, I'm sure you'll agree that a 1-in-10 return would equal Elmander's £/goals ratio, non?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Worthy4England » Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:03 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:At less than half the amount.

So, with your wizzo bang figures, I'm sure you'll agree that a 1-in-10 return would equal Elmander's £/goals ratio, non?
So to use your words. Can't be considered a success and should be put down to experience.

The problem is that you appear to be using Anelka as the benchmark for an 8 mill signing. Which it Isn't. At the time if I recall correctly we were also linked with Andy Johnson @ 10.5. Mill who's managed 13 in 86 for Fulham.

User avatar
Mar
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7012
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Mar » Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:15 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote: Yep but as I said his first season he scored in the opening game, looked bright then got injured the game after and was out for several weeks and it was stop start. Clearly a confidence player and he never really got going till his third season here when he showed why he was our record signing and ended top scorer.

Certainly much less of a disaster than the 7m quid spent on Ngog and Sordell if you take a snapshot of it at this moment in time.

He didn't get going until he had to. When he was playing for a contract he upped his game. The rest of the time he was mediocre.

Big Sam came out with the same about Henrik Pedersen that when he was playing for his contract he was scoring a lot more than when he wasn't which meant that come the start of negotiations that it would not have that much significant impact the fact he was going through a purple patch in form.

Anelka was different, he was always playing for his next contract which meant he did great things for us.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Lord Kangana » Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:34 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote: Can't be considered a success and should be put down to experience.
Indeed. Whats sauce for the goose.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38814
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by BWFC_Insane » Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:36 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:At less than half the amount.

So, with your wizzo bang figures, I'm sure you'll agree that a 1-in-10 return would equal Elmander's £/goals ratio, non?
Nothing that has been reported suggests that Sordell and Ngog combined cost half the amount Elmander did.

If we are judging them as a pair lets see if we go back up if they can score 12 premiership goals between them in a season....

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by thebish » Thu Jun 07, 2012 3:25 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:At less than half the amount.

So, with your wizzo bang figures, I'm sure you'll agree that a 1-in-10 return would equal Elmander's £/goals ratio, non?
Nothing that has been reported suggests that Sordell and Ngog combined cost half the amount Elmander did.

If we are judging them as a pair lets see if we go back up if they can score 12 premiership goals between them in a season....

or.... 18 goals between them in 3 seasons....

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Worthy4England » Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:47 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:At less than half the amount.

So, with your wizzo bang figures, I'm sure you'll agree that a 1-in-10 return would equal Elmander's £/goals ratio, non?
Nothing that has been reported suggests that Sordell and Ngog combined cost half the amount Elmander did.

If we are judging them as a pair lets see if we go back up if they can score 12 premiership goals between them in a season....

or.... 18 goals between them in 3 seasons....
Well they're off to a flyer on 3 in one season so far. It's all looking bright. All they need to do now is fire us back to the Premiership, so they can have another go.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by thebish » Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:51 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:At less than half the amount.

So, with your wizzo bang figures, I'm sure you'll agree that a 1-in-10 return would equal Elmander's £/goals ratio, non?
Nothing that has been reported suggests that Sordell and Ngog combined cost half the amount Elmander did.

If we are judging them as a pair lets see if we go back up if they can score 12 premiership goals between them in a season....

or.... 18 goals between them in 3 seasons....
Well they're off to a flyer on 3 in one season so far. It's all looking bright. All they need to do now is fire us back to the Premiership, so they can have another go.
8) merely highlighting BWFCi's particular season selection!

Relentless09
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1284
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Relentless09 » Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:17 am

Did Gary Cahill score more than times than N'gog and Sordell ? And David Wheater got 2 so he probably wasn't far off

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:38 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:At less than half the amount.

So, with your wizzo bang figures, I'm sure you'll agree that a 1-in-10 return would equal Elmander's £/goals ratio, non?
Nothing that has been reported suggests that Sordell and Ngog combined cost half the amount Elmander did.

If we are judging them as a pair lets see if we go back up if they can score 12 premiership goals between them in a season....

or.... 18 goals between them in 3 seasons....
Actually adjusted for the 7M Sordell-N'Gog/8.2m Elmander figures, it means the former pair have to find 12.75* goals between them in the next 2 seasons to represent the stunning value of Elmander.

*Figure rounded up in favour of Elmander and to the detriment of Sordell-N'Gog.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:51 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:At less than half the amount.

So, with your wizzo bang figures, I'm sure you'll agree that a 1-in-10 return would equal Elmander's £/goals ratio, non?
Nothing that has been reported suggests that Sordell and Ngog combined cost half the amount Elmander did.

If we are judging them as a pair lets see if we go back up if they can score 12 premiership goals between them in a season....

or.... 18 goals between them in 3 seasons....
Actually adjusted for the 7M Sordell-N'Gog/8.2m Elmander figures, it means the former pair have to find 12.75* goals between them in the next 2 seasons to represent the stunning value of Elmander.

*Figure rounded up in favour of Elmander and to the detriment of Sordell-N'Gog.
That would be the next two Premiership seasons (obviously) :-)

Riviman
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Bolton

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Riviman » Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:49 pm

Tope gone to Portugal:

http://www.clicklancashire.com/sport/bo ... o-ave.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?
I feel reborn !!!! No more confussion

bristolwanderer
Promising
Promising
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:47 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by bristolwanderer » Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:52 pm

Good luck to the lad

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Hoboh » Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:53 pm

Riviman wrote:Tope gone to Portugal:

http://www.clicklancashire.com/sport/bo ... o-ave.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?
I hope for his sake his salary ain't being paid into a bank over there or next door

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:01 pm

What boy doesnt dream of one day going to play for Portugese outfit Rio Ave :)

bristolwanderer
Promising
Promising
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:47 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by bristolwanderer » Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:18 pm

Remember it being one of mine as a young'un :wink:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests