1 for 1 debate

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

1 for 1 debate

Post by bwfcdan94 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 8:08 am

if you could have kept one player from last season that we lost at the expense of loosing a member of our squad for next season who would it be
(side note: the 2 players must play in the same position for example loose zat knight regain gary cahill)
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

Jez
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 852
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:13 pm

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by Jez » Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:26 am

well yeah, zat knight for cahill, not much better than that is there?

a1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:11 pm

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by a1 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 8:26 pm

stuart holden in for darren pratley

piece of piss

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13661
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by Hoboh » Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:32 pm

Owen Coyle for Gary Meg... :oops:

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by bwfcdan94 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:18 pm

Hoboh wrote:Owen Coyle for Gary Meg... :oops:
i honestly would take that if someone offered me that now
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

YtarmyYtarmy
Promising
Promising
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:01 pm
Location: North Wales

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by YtarmyYtarmy » Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:37 pm

Ngog for John McGinley

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by TKIZ! » Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:51 pm

bwfcdan94 wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Owen Coyle for Gary Meg... :oops:
i honestly would take that if someone offered me that now
Really? Why? Just honestly interested to know
Pfffft.

Puskas
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by Puskas » Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:07 pm

YtarmyYtarmy wrote:Ngog for John McGinley
I thought it was people who'd left this season?

If not, Kevin Davies for Trevor Morgan. Or Steve Elliot. Or Wayne Entwistle. Or a sack of potatoes.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by bwfcdan94 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:51 pm

TKIZ! wrote:
bwfcdan94 wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Owen Coyle for Gary Meg... :oops:
i honestly would take that if someone offered me that now
Really? Why? Just honestly interested to know
because coyle managed to achieve something near impossible that megson couldnt - relegate us, i honestly belive the season he lost his job ( i saw him just minuites after he was sacked outside the reebok with all his stuff in his arms waiking to his car) he would have just kept us up but only just mind
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

User avatar
truewhite15
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3041
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by truewhite15 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:55 pm

bwfcdan94 wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
bwfcdan94 wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Owen Coyle for Gary Meg... :oops:
i honestly would take that if someone offered me that now
Really? Why? Just honestly interested to know
because coyle managed to achieve something near impossible that megson couldnt - relegate us, i honestly belive the season he lost his job ( i saw him just minuites after he was sacked outside the reebok with all his stuff in his arms waiking to his car) he would have just kept us up but only just mind
I don't think he would have done, but that's by the by. He would probably have taken us down the season after though. In contrast, Coyle kept us up comfortably that first season, and then we spent the first 3/4s of last season dancing in the top half. Megson would have never gotten us there. Whether Megson would have kept us up last season is debatable, but I happen to think he wouldn't have done.

Relentless09
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1284
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by Relentless09 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:01 pm

bwfcdan94 for Batman 8)

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by bwfcdan94 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:02 pm

truewhite15 wrote:
bwfcdan94 wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
bwfcdan94 wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Owen Coyle for Gary Meg... :oops:
i honestly would take that if someone offered me that now
Really? Why? Just honestly interested to know
because coyle managed to achieve something near impossible that megson couldnt - relegate us, i honestly belive the season he lost his job ( i saw him just minuites after he was sacked outside the reebok with all his stuff in his arms waiking to his car) he would have just kept us up but only just mind
I don't think he would have done, but that's by the by. He would probably have taken us down the season after though. In contrast, Coyle kept us up comfortably that first season, and then we spent the first 3/4s of last season dancing in the top half. Megson would have never gotten us there. Whether Megson would have kept us up last season is debatable, but I happen to think he wouldn't have done.
i think he would as alot of the players we have are his rather than coyles, look at coyles signings you all go on about robbie blake being a waste of space and eagles being s**t, then there is ngog and everybodies favourite baldie darren pratley. if coyle had of signed just one very good player instead of those four we would have stayed up simples. :negative: better than http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/10/ ... 34x437.jpg
Last edited by bwfcdan94 on Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by bwfcdan94 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:02 pm

Relentless09 wrote:bwfcdan94 for Batman 8)
i still dont really know who this batman bloke is but from what i gather he is a massive WUM
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by plymouth wanderer » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:11 pm

i think he would as alot of the players we have are his rather than coyles, look at coyles signings you all go on about robbie blake being a waste of space and eagles being s**t, then there is ngog and everybodies favourite baldie darren pratley. if coyle had of signed just one very good player instead of those four we would have stayed up simples. :negative: better than http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/10/ ... 34x437.jpg[/quote]


That's George Clooney
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

User avatar
truewhite15
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3041
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by truewhite15 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:14 pm

Pratley's shite, I'll grant you. Eagles is actually useful. And, as has been pointed out numerous times, there's a difference between signing players and getting them to play. We might have been shit last season, fair enough. But we were shit ALL THE TIME under Megson. When Coyle gets the team to play, they play a damn sight better than they ever could under Megson. If signing players was all there was to it, we'd have a scout as a manager.

Oh, and your point about signing one "very good" player instead of the 4 you mention. Bullshit. If he had done that, we'd have been fecked a long time before the last day of the season, because our squad would have been nowhere near sufficient to carry us through.

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by bwfcdan94 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:26 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:i think he would as alot of the players we have are his rather than coyles, look at coyles signings you all go on about robbie blake being a waste of space and eagles being s**t, then there is ngog and everybodies favourite baldie darren pratley. if coyle had of signed just one very good player instead of those four we would have stayed up simples. :negative: better than http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/10/ ... 34x437.jpg

That's George Clooney[/quote]

:D :D :D who mistakingly fell out of a plane on the way to manchester airport and landed in burnley terrified
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by bwfcdan94 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:30 pm

truewhite15 wrote:Pratley's shite, I'll grant you. Eagles is actually useful. And, as has been pointed out numerous times, there's a difference between signing players and getting them to play. We might have been shit last season, fair enough. But we were shit ALL THE TIME under Megson. When Coyle gets the team to play, they play a damn sight better than they ever could under Megson. If signing players was all there was to it, we'd have a scout as a manager.

Oh, and your point about signing one "very good" player instead of the 4 you mention. Bullshit. If he had done that, we'd have been fecked a long time before the last day of the season, because our squad would have been nowhere near sufficient to carry us through.
no i am pressuming that these are the tones giving off by this forum, IMO eagles is one of our best players, pratley is great as well as is the case with ngog but blake well he is below par at best
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

User avatar
truewhite15
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3041
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by truewhite15 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:47 pm

bwfcdan94 wrote:
truewhite15 wrote:Pratley's shite, I'll grant you. Eagles is actually useful. And, as has been pointed out numerous times, there's a difference between signing players and getting them to play. We might have been shit last season, fair enough. But we were shit ALL THE TIME under Megson. When Coyle gets the team to play, they play a damn sight better than they ever could under Megson. If signing players was all there was to it, we'd have a scout as a manager.

Oh, and your point about signing one "very good" player instead of the 4 you mention. Bullshit. If he had done that, we'd have been fecked a long time before the last day of the season, because our squad would have been nowhere near sufficient to carry us through.
no i am pressuming that these are the tones giving off by this forum, IMO eagles is one of our best players, pratley is great as well as is the case with ngog but blake well he is below par at best
Hang on a bloody second. You said, and I quote;
bwfcdan94 wrote: i think he would as alot of the players we have are his rather than coyles, look at coyles signings you all go on about robbie blake being a waste of space and eagles being s**t, then there is ngog and everybodies favourite baldie darren pratley. if coyle had of signed just one very good player instead of those four we would have stayed up simples
So you're using them as a stick with which to beat Coyle in your support of Megson, in terms of transfers, saying that if we'd signed one great player instead of them, we'd have stayed up, and you imply that Megson would have signed said player.

But then you say that three of the players you mentioned are the best players at the club. You've been definitively found out as a bullshit merchant, my son.

YtarmyYtarmy
Promising
Promising
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:01 pm
Location: North Wales

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by YtarmyYtarmy » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:54 pm

Puskas wrote:
YtarmyYtarmy wrote:Ngog for John McGinley
I thought it was people who'd left this season?

If not, Kevin Davies for Trevor Morgan. Or Steve Elliot. Or Wayne Entwistle. Or a sack of potatoes.
Sorry didnt read the first part of the thread fully, but i suppose it Cahill back for Knight, end of topic for me.

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: 1 for 1 debate

Post by bwfcdan94 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:17 pm

truewhite15 wrote:
bwfcdan94 wrote:
truewhite15 wrote:Pratley's shite, I'll grant you. Eagles is actually useful. And, as has been pointed out numerous times, there's a difference between signing players and getting them to play. We might have been shit last season, fair enough. But we were shit ALL THE TIME under Megson. When Coyle gets the team to play, they play a damn sight better than they ever could under Megson. If signing players was all there was to it, we'd have a scout as a manager.

Oh, and your point about signing one "very good" player instead of the 4 you mention. Bullshit. If he had done that, we'd have been fecked a long time before the last day of the season, because our squad would have been nowhere near sufficient to carry us through.
no i am pressuming that these are the tones giving off by this forum, IMO eagles is one of our best players, pratley is great as well as is the case with ngog but blake well he is below par at best
Hang on a bloody second. You said, and I quote;

yes megson signed this now champ league winner from sheffield called gary cahill
bwfcdan94 wrote: i think he would as alot of the players we have are his rather than coyles, look at coyles signings you all go on about robbie blake being a waste of space and eagles being s**t, then there is ngog and everybodies favourite baldie darren pratley. if coyle had of signed just one very good player instead of those four we would have stayed up simples
So you're using them as a stick with which to beat Coyle in your support of Megson, in terms of transfers, saying that if we'd signed one great player instead of them, we'd have stayed up, and you imply that Megson would have signed said player.

But then you say that three of the players you mentioned are the best players at the club. You've been definitively found out as a bullshit merchant, my son.
i have jumped from popular opinions that i disagree with to my opinion that you all disagree with
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], The_Gun, truewhite15 and 46 guests