Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by TANGODANCER » Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:26 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:Did anyone ever have the misfortune of playing on that one at the back of Queen's Drive in Bromley Cross before they leveled it? I played on it once as a kid. I swear, if you stood at the bottom corner flag the one diagonally opposite was a good 30 feet higher. Not only that but it had a massive banking down one side towards Eagley Brook and because of the shape of the pitch the ball would naturally gravitate in this direction. The rule was whoever it came off had to go and mug it! :D
Thornleigh had one similar to that at one time. had a slope right across it. Take a corner with anything more than a side foot and it was a throw in on the other side. Also one of the smallest pitches I ever saw. Mind you, Yorkshire league pitches are all like that. On most of them they slope so much the sheep shit rolls off of its own accord. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by TANGODANCER » Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:32 pm

Nobody's mentioned the winter wonderland that's Leverhulme Park (not seen it in a fair while mind) and the back to back goalposts. Score a goal and half the players on the next pitch finished up chasing your ball and vice-versa. Several, er, altercations, took place in a regular basis. :mrgreen:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:41 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:Did anyone ever have the misfortune of playing on that one at the back of Queen's Drive in Bromley Cross before they leveled it? I played on it once as a kid. I swear, if you stood at the bottom corner flag the one diagonally opposite was a good 30 feet higher. Not only that but it had a massive banking down one side towards Eagley Brook and because of the shape of the pitch the ball would naturally gravitate in this direction. The rule was whoever it came off had to go and mug it! :D
Image
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24843
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Prufrock » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:13 pm

Holden midfielder wrote:Harsh comments on Ream. Thought he adjusted pretty quick to the Prem and should excel in Tje Championship. My biggest concern is that Mills (who I rate highly) and Ream are very similar types of central defenders: fit, quick, get forward, technical, like to play their way out of the back, and very comfortable On the ball. Problem is that neither is very physical or a "presence" in the back. A cold night in some nasty, cold, windy, muddy pitch in South Bermondsey wil be a problem for them as the abuse of the home fans is hurled from the stands and the wind comes out of Cold Blow Lane. Meanwhile the opposition lumps balls non stop into our box .... You get the drift.

Now, where DID Tim Ream make his debut for us? I can't quite remember.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by thebish » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:16 pm

monty - that photo is fantastic! where is it?

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:12 pm

thebish wrote:monty - that photo is fantastic! where is it?
I believe it is in the Olympic park, Munich.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by TKIZ! » Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:18 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Did anyone ever have the misfortune of playing on that one at the back of Queen's Drive in Bromley Cross before they leveled it? I played on it once as a kid. I swear, if you stood at the bottom corner flag the one diagonally opposite was a good 30 feet higher. Not only that but it had a massive banking down one side towards Eagley Brook and because of the shape of the pitch the ball would naturally gravitate in this direction. The rule was whoever it came off had to go and mug it! :D
Thornleigh had one similar to that at one time. had a slope right across it. Take a corner with anything more than a side foot and it was a throw in on the other side. Also one of the smallest pitches I ever saw. Mind you, Yorkshire league pitches are all like that. On most of them they slope so much the sheep shit rolls off of its own accord. :wink:
I know the Thornleigh one as I'm an old boy. '89-94
Pfffft.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by bobo the clown » Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:07 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:Thornleigh had one similar to that at one time. had a slope right across it. Take a corner with anything more than a side foot and it was a throw in on the other side. Also one of the smallest pitches I ever saw.

Mind you, Yorkshire league pitches are all like that. On most of them they slope so much the sheep shit rolls off of its own accord. :wink:
They must have sorted the Thorners pitch by my time TD.

Now, Yorkshire pitches. I played at one in Dewsbury which was more or less the usual rectangle ... well, 3 right angles and one "corner flag" which was actually an oak tree, about 4 feet into the pitch.

Not a lot too traumatic about that, unless the goat tethered to it decided to have a go at you.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by thebish » Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:08 pm

bobo the clown wrote: Now, Yorkshire pitches. I played at one in Dewsbury which was more or less the usual rectangle ... well, 3 right angles and one "corner flag" which was actually an oak tree, about 4 feet into the pitch.
I think you'll find that was Paul Robinson...

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Bruce Rioja » Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:19 pm

bobo the clown wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:Thornleigh had one similar to that at one time. had a slope right across it. Take a corner with anything more than a side foot and it was a throw in on the other side. Also one of the smallest pitches I ever saw.

Mind you, Yorkshire league pitches are all like that. On most of them they slope so much the sheep shit rolls off of its own accord. :wink:
They must have sorted the Thorners pitch by my time TD.

Now, Yorkshire pitches. I played at one in Dewsbury which was more or less the usual rectangle ... well, 3 right angles and one "corner flag" which was actually an oak tree, about 4 feet into the pitch.

Not a lot too traumatic about that, unless the goat tethered to it decided to have a go at you.
That pitch will have been conducive to your standard, Bobo. I also note that you went to Thornleigh.Hmmm. There's a pattern emerging here. 8)
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by TANGODANCER » Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:38 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote: That pitch will have been conducive to your standard, Bobo. I also note that you went to Thornleigh.Hmmm. There's a pattern emerging here. 8)
I wish to point out that I didn't go to Thornleigh. I just played a couple of times on their pitch. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:59 pm

thebish wrote:
bobo the clown wrote: Now, Yorkshire pitches. I played at one in Dewsbury which was more or less the usual rectangle ... well, 3 right angles and one "corner flag" which was actually an oak tree, about 4 feet into the pitch.
I think you'll find that was Paul Robinson...
Only four feet in? Could be worse.

Image
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Gary the Enfield » Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:56 am

TKIZ! wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Did anyone ever have the misfortune of playing on that one at the back of Queen's Drive in Bromley Cross before they leveled it? I played on it once as a kid. I swear, if you stood at the bottom corner flag the one diagonally opposite was a good 30 feet higher. Not only that but it had a massive banking down one side towards Eagley Brook and because of the shape of the pitch the ball would naturally gravitate in this direction. The rule was whoever it came off had to go and mug it! :D
Thornleigh had one similar to that at one time. had a slope right across it. Take a corner with anything more than a side foot and it was a throw in on the other side. Also one of the smallest pitches I ever saw. Mind you, Yorkshire league pitches are all like that. On most of them they slope so much the sheep shit rolls off of its own accord. :wink:
I know the Thornleigh one as I'm an old boy. '89-94

Join the clan. That's you, me Zulu and Bobo (that have so far admitted to it). :wink:

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by CAPSLOCK » Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:29 am

Mrs CAPS went to scruffberts

I attended a proper school
Sto ut Serviam

Riviman
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Bolton

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Riviman » Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:52 am

Don't you just love the way the posts deviate from discussion about Zat Knight to what school people went to, via sloping football pitches!!!
I feel reborn !!!! No more confussion

Bruno3
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:02 pm

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Bruno3 » Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:05 am

Riviman wrote:Don't you just love the way the posts deviate from discussion about Zat Knight to what school people went to, via sloping football pitches!!!
It's like a mirror image of "Just a minute" where hesitation, deviation and repetition are obligatory

Riviman
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Bolton

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Riviman » Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:10 am

Bruno3 wrote:
Riviman wrote:Don't you just love the way the posts deviate from discussion about Zat Knight to what school people went to, via sloping football pitches!!!
It's like a mirror image of "Just a minute" where hesitation, deviation and repetition are obligatory
Love it :D
I feel reborn !!!! No more confussion

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Bruce Rioja » Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:33 am

Gary the Enfield wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Did anyone ever have the misfortune of playing on that one at the back of Queen's Drive in Bromley Cross before they leveled it? I played on it once as a kid. I swear, if you stood at the bottom corner flag the one diagonally opposite was a good 30 feet higher. Not only that but it had a massive banking down one side towards Eagley Brook and because of the shape of the pitch the ball would naturally gravitate in this direction. The rule was whoever it came off had to go and mug it! :D
Thornleigh had one similar to that at one time. had a slope right across it. Take a corner with anything more than a side foot and it was a throw in on the other side. Also one of the smallest pitches I ever saw. Mind you, Yorkshire league pitches are all like that. On most of them they slope so much the sheep shit rolls off of its own accord. :wink:
I know the Thornleigh one as I'm an old boy. '89-94

Join the clan. That's you, me Zulu and Bobo (that have so far admitted to it). :wink:
Where was this sloping pitch then? Whenever I played at Thornleigh those pitches across the road were very decent - the one at the top on the bend was excellent. :?
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Bruce Rioja » Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:35 am

Riviman wrote:Don't you just love the way the posts deviate from discussion about Zat Knight to what school people went to, via sloping football pitches!!!
Imagine Zat Knight playing on a shit pitch, the ill-educated lummox! :shock:
May the bridges I burn light your way

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by bobo the clown » Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:49 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Did anyone ever have the misfortune of playing on that one at the back of Queen's Drive in Bromley Cross before they leveled it? I played on it once as a kid. I swear, if you stood at the bottom corner flag the one diagonally opposite was a good 30 feet higher. Not only that but it had a massive banking down one side towards Eagley Brook and because of the shape of the pitch the ball would naturally gravitate in this direction. The rule was whoever it came off had to go and mug it! :D
Thornleigh had one similar to that at one time. had a slope right across it. Take a corner with anything more than a side foot and it was a throw in on the other side. Also one of the smallest pitches I ever saw. Mind you, Yorkshire league pitches are all like that. On most of them they slope so much the sheep shit rolls off of its own accord. :wink:
I know the Thornleigh one as I'm an old boy. '89-94

Join the clan. That's you, me Zulu and Bobo (that have so far admitted to it). :wink:
Where was this sloping pitch then? Whenever I played at Thornleigh those pitches across the road were very decent - the one at the top on the bend was excellent. :?
My thoughts to. There was one with a bit of a goal to goal slope, but generally they were OK & the "first X11" pitch, which is the one Bruce is speaking about ... he must have watched his chums playing on it .... was always very decent.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abdoulaye's Twin, truewhite15 and 47 guests