Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
bettyrasta
Promising
Promising
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Westhoughton

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by bettyrasta » Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:21 pm

Gary the Enfield wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Did anyone ever have the misfortune of playing on that one at the back of Queen's Drive in Bromley Cross before they leveled it? I played on it once as a kid. I swear, if you stood at the bottom corner flag the one diagonally opposite was a good 30 feet higher. Not only that but it had a massive banking down one side towards Eagley Brook and because of the shape of the pitch the ball would naturally gravitate in this direction. The rule was whoever it came off had to go and mug it! :D
Thornleigh had one similar to that at one time. had a slope right across it. Take a corner with anything more than a side foot and it was a throw in on the other side. Also one of the smallest pitches I ever saw. Mind you, Yorkshire league pitches are all like that. On most of them they slope so much the sheep shit rolls off of its own accord. :wink:
I know the Thornleigh one as I'm an old boy. '89-94

Join the clan. That's you, me Zulu and Bobo (that have so far admitted to it). :wink:
Er me too. Don't remember the sloping pitch, Zat Knight or the goat though..

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by TANGODANCER » Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:31 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
Where was this sloping pitch then? Whenever I played at Thornleigh those pitches across the road were very decent - the one at the top on the bend was excellent. :?
Given my age it has to be some fair years back. I played for Brownlow Fold back then and it was a friendly. It was one of those that you looked at and said "kinell". Very narrow and, as stated, with a wing to wing slope. Absolutely no doubt it was there. Probably alterations took place later but I remember that one.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:53 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
Where was this sloping pitch then? Whenever I played at Thornleigh those pitches across the road were very decent - the one at the top on the bend was excellent. :?
Given my age it has to be some fair years back. I played for Brownlow Fold back then and it was a friendly. It was one of those that you looked at and said "kinell". Very narrow and, as stated, with a wing to wing slope. Absolutely no doubt it was there. Probably alterations took place later but I remember that one.
I expect it got flattened out a bit in the Great Flood.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by TANGODANCER » Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:56 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
Where was this sloping pitch then? Whenever I played at Thornleigh those pitches across the road were very decent - the one at the top on the bend was excellent. :?
Given my age it has to be some fair years back. I played for Brownlow Fold back then and it was a friendly. It was one of those that you looked at and said "kinell". Very narrow and, as stated, with a wing to wing slope. Absolutely no doubt it was there. Probably alterations took place later but I remember that one.
I expect it got flattened out a bit in the Great Flood.
Careful Monty. Blessed Don Bosco is listening. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by bobo the clown » Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:08 pm

Now Grundy Hill, the Horwich RMI ground. THAT was a side to side slope.

I played there maybe 20 times & never got used to it ... & square posts too !!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by jaffka » Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:35 pm

So, is Zat sh*t then?

User avatar
Little Green Man
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4471
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Justin Edinburgh

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Little Green Man » Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:46 pm

jaffka wrote:So, is Zat sh*t then?
Only sh*t? I'd go as far as saying he's average.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by thebish » Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:13 pm

he's about right for a club like us.

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by officer_dibble » Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:22 pm

thebish wrote:he's about right for a club like us.
If you want to employ players who dont give a shit

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by thebish » Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:14 pm

officer_dibble wrote:
thebish wrote:he's about right for a club like us.
If you want to employ players who dont give a shit
i still don't know how on earth people measure the he-gives-a-shitness of one player compared to another...

is it about arm-pumping?? :conf:

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by officer_dibble » Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:24 am

Haha - yup its pashun as termed by white van drivers. Usually when in conversation about Engurland.

Bruno3
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:02 pm

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Bruno3 » Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:05 pm

Given that this is the thread that goes "off piste" - when we signed our new keeper my eldest lad said he sounds like a 60's pop star. "Lonnie Donegan?" says I. " Is Lonnie his first name?" says he. "No, it's Andy" says I. "Pity" says he. Since then I just can't say Andy Lonergan without stumbling over my words.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:09 pm

Bruno3 wrote:Given that this is the thread that goes "off piste" - when we signed our new keeper my eldest lad said he sounds like a 60's pop star. "Lonnie Donegan?" says I. " Is Lonnie his first name?" says he. "No, it's Andy" says I. "Pity" says he. Since then I just can't say Andy Lonergan without stumbling over my words.
Well, you could always try yodeling it. ;)
May the bridges I burn light your way

Bruno3
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:02 pm

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Bruno3 » Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:14 pm

That would cause a stir in the North Stand Upper

Gail Platz
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 973
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Gail Platz » Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:14 pm

Zat Knight is very hit and miss and to be fair to him he's had some really solid games for us, but he's so damn inconsistent it costs us too much. He doesn't make major gaffes like Gerald Cid, it's just small lapses of concentration like not marking someone properly or being slightly out of position that costs us. Whether that will have as much of an effect in the Championship only time will tell, but I don't think he'll get caught out quite as much. In my opinion I'm quite happy to see him sign a new deal but only as a back up to Ream, Mills and Wheater. I think those four are strong enough for a promotion push.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Bruce Rioja » Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:22 pm

:roll:

Image
May the bridges I burn light your way

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14516
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by boltonboris » Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:24 pm

He... WON. A. Header?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Bruno3
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:02 pm

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Bruno3 » Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:48 pm

No - he fouled the other guy and hand balled it as well so gave two free kicks away at the same time - and it was in the penalty area so.......

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Bruce Rioja » Thu Jul 19, 2012 1:11 pm

boltonboris wrote:He... WON. A. Header?
Which landed in Largs! ;)
May the bridges I burn light your way

Wandering Willy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm

Re: Is Zat Knight Half as bad as is perceived on here?

Post by Wandering Willy » Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:10 pm

boltonboris wrote:He... WON. A. Header?

Err - isn't that part of his job.

Oh - and he can't jump either?
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 45 guests