Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
That's really going to happen isn't it...
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Ricardo Fuller?
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
No just fatter
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Certain players are on much more than that. Marquez, Henry, Keane, Beckham etc.. Cahill will be getting the same wages as them.Sponge wrote:SmokinFrazier wrote:His wages would probably be too big, I think. The MLS pay pretty well and he was on a good amount at Everton, so if it's a straight choice between a similar wage in the MLS or well over 50% less in the Championship, he was always going to take the money. I can't blame him either. I've always really liked Tim Cahill and I think he's been a model professional during his Everton career, so I can't begrudge him making plenty more money before he retires.
He would have been great though, I'm sure.
Eh?! There's an annual salary cap in the MLS of $2,810,000 per team (according to Wikipedia). He was earning more than that alone at Everton. I seem to remember Ream was on about $40,000 at Red Bulls – $40,000 per year! So he's obviously not gone there for the salary.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Agreed, but what makes us think St. Owen would have any more intention to play him than he did last year ??Relentless09 wrote:If that means he's on a free I would take him back, any time he played he gave 100% and looked like doing something but unfortunately Owen Coyle didn't seem to think he was good enough
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Don't know if i'm in the minority but I thought he was poor, like really really dire. Enjoyed watching him with Stoke years back and was bristling with excitement when I first saw him (Liverpool away I think it was) but he was a let down for me. Will agree though he wasn't played to his strengths but will that change?? Also wasn't it believed his relationship with OC was a little frostyy??bobo the clown wrote:Agreed, but what makes us think St. Owen would have any more intention to play him than he did last year ??Relentless09 wrote:If that means he's on a free I would take him back, any time he played he gave 100% and looked like doing something but unfortunately Owen Coyle didn't seem to think he was good enough
Disclaimer: I also rate David Ngog though so maybe i'm just a poor judge of player!
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 2:48 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Have I really just read someone seriously suggest we could've attracted Tim Cahill?
There are bleeding premier league clubs who wouldn't have been able to attract him against the US competition.
Jesus wept, some folk haven't woken up since May have they...
There are bleeding premier league clubs who wouldn't have been able to attract him against the US competition.
Jesus wept, some folk haven't woken up since May have they...
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
- Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Each team is allowed up to three "designated players." Only the first $350,000 of their salary counts against the cap. So even though Henry makes over $5 million a year, he's still only a $350,000 hit against the cap. Transfer fees also count towards the cap, so Cahill will definitely be a DP.SmokinFrazier wrote:Certain players are on much more than that. Marquez, Henry, Keane, Beckham etc.. Cahill will be getting the same wages as them.Sponge wrote:SmokinFrazier wrote:His wages would probably be too big, I think. The MLS pay pretty well and he was on a good amount at Everton, so if it's a straight choice between a similar wage in the MLS or well over 50% less in the Championship, he was always going to take the money. I can't blame him either. I've always really liked Tim Cahill and I think he's been a model professional during his Everton career, so I can't begrudge him making plenty more money before he retires.
He would have been great though, I'm sure.
Eh?! There's an annual salary cap in the MLS of $2,810,000 per team (according to Wikipedia). He was earning more than that alone at Everton. I seem to remember Ream was on about $40,000 at Red Bulls – $40,000 per year! So he's obviously not gone there for the salary.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
He seemed fair decent at Boro and Stoke but he was fecking awful for us. Looked completely lost most of the time.plymouth wanderer wrote:ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Would be ok on a sensible wage but not the type of striker / player we need the most.
Agreed
But i don't think coyle rates him shame cus i think he's a quality player and we do need another striker
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
As would anyone played so badly out of position.Gail Platz wrote:He seemed fair decent at Boro and Stoke but he was fecking awful for us. Looked completely lost most of the time.plymouth wanderer wrote:Agreedohjimmyjimmy wrote:Would be ok on a sensible wage but not the type of striker / player we need the most.
But i don't think coyle rates him shame cus i think he's a quality player and we do need another striker
It'd be like asking Knight to play centre hal.......
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Cmon Bobo, Tunners is shit

-
- Reliable
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
A forward to a winger isn't massively different and shouldn't be used as an excuse for running as if your shoelaces are tied together, falling over the ball and being generally shit.bobo the clown wrote:As would anyone played so badly out of position.Gail Platz wrote:He seemed fair decent at Boro and Stoke but he was fecking awful for us. Looked completely lost most of the time.plymouth wanderer wrote:Agreedohjimmyjimmy wrote:Would be ok on a sensible wage but not the type of striker / player we need the most.
But i don't think coyle rates him shame cus i think he's a quality player and we do need another striker
It'd be like asking Knight to play centre hal.......
For someone that is paid thousands a week to play football you'd expect at least basic controlling and passing of the ball. That was somehow beyond this joker in his time with us.
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/wa ... isse_deal/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?
Pfffft.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
There was a comment on the official site during the game tonight that we might get Hazard's younger broher on loan. Sort of a minor hazard?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
H. Pedersen wrote:Each team is allowed up to three "designated players." Only the first $350,000 of their salary counts against the cap. So even though Henry makes over $5 million a year, he's still only a $350,000 hit against the cap. Transfer fees also count towards the cap, so Cahill will definitely be a DP.SmokinFrazier wrote:Certain players are on much more than that. Marquez, Henry, Keane, Beckham etc.. Cahill will be getting the same wages as them.Sponge wrote:SmokinFrazier wrote:His wages would probably be too big, I think. The MLS pay pretty well and he was on a good amount at Everton, so if it's a straight choice between a similar wage in the MLS or well over 50% less in the Championship, he was always going to take the money. I can't blame him either. I've always really liked Tim Cahill and I think he's been a model professional during his Everton career, so I can't begrudge him making plenty more money before he retires.
He would have been great though, I'm sure.
Eh?! There's an annual salary cap in the MLS of $2,810,000 per team (according to Wikipedia). He was earning more than that alone at Everton. I seem to remember Ream was on about $40,000 at Red Bulls – $40,000 per year! So he's obviously not gone there for the salary.
Ah, I see. I felt it couldn't be true as I was writing it, but saw nothing to the contrary in the WIkipedia article. Shame really – I liked the idea of Beckham earning £30,000.
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
TANGODANCER wrote:There was a comment on the official site during the game tonight that we might get Hazard's younger broher on loan. Sort of a minor hazard?

-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
'we could send you on loan son...fancy a trip, Hazard?'
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Thorgan is a great player, not too far off his brother potential-wise, but he's an attacking midfielder. Do we really need him with Eagles and Mark Davies?TANGODANCER wrote:There was a comment on the official site during the game tonight that we might get Hazard's younger broher on loan. Sort of a minor hazard?
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
we'll call you Jimmy!ohjimmyjimmy wrote:'we could send you on loan son...fancy a trip, Hazard?'

-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Expect many more of them throught the season Bish, a name like Hazard doesnt come long every day...for example, just think how dangerous he must be at set pieces!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests