Time to go

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

Should we get rid of Owen Coyle?

Yes
56
38%
No
70
48%
Maybe
20
14%
 
Total votes: 146

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:07 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:So g'wan, give me a clue how fooked we are.
We have to get promoted this season, or our budget will indeed equal the likes of Burnley.

Under those circumstances, I'm looking for a bit of inspiration.

I need to know who it is thats going to stop that. Because its abundantly clear that from now on (much like Wenger at Arsenal, and look at the shit from know-nowts that gets thrown at him) we are now working to a policy of balancing the books. Thats it. Little, indeed probably no more borrowing-based spending. With a general intention of paying Uncle Eddie back in the meantime. The good times have gone.
So what I think you're suggesting is that this is our last chance saloon? This season, no other? If we get it wrong this season that's IT, done for.

If that's the case, I might want to review giving him until the end of September before I get really pi$$ed.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38814
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:08 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Precisely. Thats the tools he'll have. And with little, if any, extra funds to invest.

So then, who is this saviour who will come in and work for nowt with nowt and guarantee us promotion? From where I see it we're f*cked until people understand we're f*cked. Then we can start to rebuild.
Dean Holdsworth. :wink:
You're taking the piss, right? :?
Yes. Thought he is doing well as a manager apparently.
Indeed he is -but not half as well as Owen Coyle was. ;)
True, though Adkins didn't do as well as Coyle prior to going to Southampton if you're basing it purely on levels they've managed at. Don't mind going to the lower leagues if the right candidate is down there. Like we did for Allardyce....

Was joking about Holdsworth, mind given our track record, who the feck knows....
Last edited by BWFC_Insane on Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Time to go

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:11 pm

Indeed Worthy. What I'm pointing out is that if we do get someone else in and expect immediate results, it may just kick us in the nuts. Perhaps a young manager with the remit of 3 years to help restructure the club, cut his teeth and, ultimately, get us promoted would be the only viable solution. That or gamble on the usual suspects. Which may reap short term dividends, and maybe thats all that a club like we can hope for. But it would still leave us in the dangerous yo-yo-then-overspend spiral. that can't last indefinitely.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38814
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:14 pm

Win the next three and we won't have to worry about bringing anyone in, until middle of September at least. :wink:

norm the jedi
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
Location: Near a Shandy
Contact:

Re: Time to go

Post by norm the jedi » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:19 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:Win the next three and we won't have to worry about bringing anyone in, until middle of September at least. :wink:
3 on the spin? :grin:
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Time to go

Post by Bruce Rioja » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:20 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:Gartside was clear at the fans forum that we are not paying Eddie back and he doesn't want it back. He also said that there are interest repayments to him put through the books for tax reasons, but in reality we are not paying it.
He did indeed, and it requires someone with a better understanding of corporate finance than I (Yes, Worthington. You!) to explain it. Garty also said that the money we owe ED is owed to Moonstone Investments? Garty said that this was a trust, but as far as I could see when I got home - they build collapsible Brazilian shopping malls. He went on to say that if ED wants to take his money out then he has to put the same amount back in. How the feck does that work? :conf:
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38814
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:28 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Gartside was clear at the fans forum that we are not paying Eddie back and he doesn't want it back. He also said that there are interest repayments to him put through the books for tax reasons, but in reality we are not paying it.
He did indeed, and it requires someone with a better understanding of corporate finance than I (Yes, Worthington. You!) to explain it. Garty also said that the money we owe ED is owed to Moonstone Investments? Garty said that this was a trust, but as far as I could see when I got home - they build collapsible Brazilian shopping malls. He went on to say that if ED wants to take his money out then he has to put the same amount back in. How the feck does that work? :conf:
I didn't make a lot of sense, but I think he was basically saying as owner of BWFC Eddie would have to put money in, so as to repay the money he's already put in.......

Or lose value icon the company he owns by resource stripping ultimately to the same effect of losing money.....

That was my simplistic understanding of it.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:29 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Indeed Worthy. What I'm pointing out is that if we do get someone else in and expect immediate results, it may just kick us in the nuts. Perhaps a young manager with the remit of 3 years to help restructure the club, cut his teeth and, ultimately, get us promoted would be the only viable solution. That or gamble on the usual suspects. Which may reap short term dividends, and maybe thats all that a club like we can hope for. But it would still leave us in the dangerous yo-yo-then-overspend spiral. that can't last indefinitely.
I understand that LK, my main contention with Coyle is that he hasn't done as well as I'd have expected with the resources he's had. He had a great start and was a well welcomed change from HWSNBN. But he's actually never been anywhere long enough to be on the downturn and as soon as it looked like happening at Burnley, he hopped to us. So it's really new territory for him and unfortunately, I've not seen anything to tell me he has any conception of "what happens next". We had that few games in Jan/Feb where we went 4-5-1 and I thought maybe he'd got it, then we played Norwich away and I thought back to square 1. You get the impression that he thinks the only way you can win a game is to play 4-4-2 - which is fine if he's signed the players who can play that formation - but he hasn't.

So I look at his signings, I look at his resources, I look at how we're set up as a team, I look at our results - and I have no confidence in him at all.

User avatar
truewhite15
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3032
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by truewhite15 » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:42 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:
truewhite15 wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Precisely. Thats the tools he'll have. And with little, if any, extra funds to invest.

So then, who is this saviour who will come in and work for nowt with nowt and guarantee us promotion? From where I see it we're f*cked until people understand we're f*cked. Then we can start to rebuild.
So your great idea is to keep the current useless fecker until the club goes bankrupt, down the shitter and we have to start again from the Unibond league? Fantastic, that one...
Sorry, I'm getting senile in my old age, please could you just give me a reminder where I've put anything even remotely close to that. I can't seem to find it.
I'm confused as to what you are saying then. I understand that you're under the impression that we're working on pennies, despite assurances from manager and chairman that that isn't the case, but that's your view, and I can live with that, even if I don't agree with it.

But your comment of "We're fecked until people understand we're fecked. Then we can start to rebuild". I just don't get it. Are you advocating that we just say "sod it. Let's not change anything in the hope that we'll get something better, because we're at the financial level of League 2, so we might as well just get there by the quickest means possible"? I understand that you're cynical of the financial nature of football in general, and us in particular, but that just seems pessimistic in the extreme. Or have I misunderstood again?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Time to go

Post by thebish » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:47 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
So what youre saying is, we'd have been better placed, when we were a premiership club, of 11 years and still in it to attract a better manager? Say last November.... :wink:
in what way did I say anything even remotely close to that?? :roll: give it a rest!

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Time to go

Post by CAPSLOCK » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:50 pm

Does a lack of money explain

1 buying Sordell and not using him
2 his treatment of Muamba pre Spurs
3 putting LCY on for his first game in 8 years when we're defending a lead
4 reverting to 4-4-2 v wigan despite being on a good run 'cos it worked once before'
5 chopping and changing our back four more regularly than I change my crackers

I accept there's not the money we had
We've still spent more on this shambles he's assembled than most teams in this Division
Our wage bill will also be at the top end

He really has no excuses
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38814
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:51 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
So what youre saying is, we'd have been better placed, when we were a premiership club, of 11 years and still in it to attract a better manager? Say last November.... :wink:
in what way did I say anything even remotely close to that?? :roll: give it a rest!
badly phrased, I'll grant... I meant "desperate enough" to not hold out for a club with a better transfer pot on offer - and/or some semblance of premiership stability.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Time to go

Post by thebish » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:45 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
So what youre saying is, we'd have been better placed, when we were a premiership club, of 11 years and still in it to attract a better manager? Say last November.... :wink:
in what way did I say anything even remotely close to that?? :roll: give it a rest!
badly phrased, I'll grant... I meant "desperate enough" to not hold out for a club with a better transfer pot on offer - and/or some semblance of premiership stability.
are you now saying that back in november we had an enviable transfer pot and a semblance of premiership stability???????????

why - my memory is that back then you said we were as good as doomed?? in what what way did we have any semblance of premiership stability back in november??

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Time to go

Post by thebish » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:56 pm

fergie out!!!

£24mill new signing and still no goals... tsssk

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9404
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: Time to go

Post by Harry Genshaw » Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:03 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:Does a lack of money explain

1 buying Sordell and not using him
2 his treatment of Muamba pre Spurs
3 putting LCY on for his first game in 8 years when we're defending a lead
4 reverting to 4-4-2 v wigan despite being on a good run 'cos it worked once before'
5 chopping and changing our back four more regularly than I change my crackers

I accept there's not the money we had
We've still spent more on this shambles he's assembled than most teams in this Division
Our wage bill will also be at the top end

He really has no excuses
2/3rds of the way into yon book and I'm with you on Kenny Jackett if Coyle goes
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

Holden midfielder
Promising
Promising
Posts: 324
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 4:41 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by Holden midfielder » Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:15 pm

We are resembling Einstein's definition of insanity: doing the same things over and over yet expectingdifferent results. Specifically playing a 4-4-2 when we do not have the personnel to play that system.

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: Time to go

Post by William the White » Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:38 pm

thebish wrote:fergie out!!!

£24mill new signing and still no goals... tsssk
Despite the fact I really hate Everton, i smiled at that result... broadly...

midlands exile
Promising
Promising
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 1:24 pm

Re: Time to go

Post by midlands exile » Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:53 pm

thebish wrote:fergie out!!!

£24mill new signing and still no goals... tsssk
I wonder if fergie will keep the same 11 players in the same formation for their next game? And refuse to start van persie until Xmas?

SmokinFrazier
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am

Re: Time to go

Post by SmokinFrazier » Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:00 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:So g'wan, give me a clue how fooked we are.
We have to get promoted this season, or our budget will indeed equal the likes of Burnley.

Under those circumstances, I'm looking for a bit of inspiration.

I need to know who it is thats going to stop that. Because its abundantly clear that from now on (much like Wenger at Arsenal, and look at the shit from know-nowts that gets thrown at him) we are now working to a policy of balancing the books. Thats it. Little, indeed probably no more borrowing-based spending. With a general intention of paying Uncle Eddie back in the meantime. The good times have gone.
Just to be clear, whilst the rest is no doubt correct, Gartside was clear at the fans forum that we are not paying Eddie back and he doesn't want it back. He also said that there are interest repayments to him put through the books for tax reasons, but in reality we are not paying it.
If we aren't going to pay Eddie back, that means that we have no issues with debt then, right?

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Time to go

Post by jaffka » Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:01 am

I wonder if he will bung me £5m and not want it back?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abdoulaye's Twin, Google [Bot] and 41 guests