'Ull V Bolton
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
I think the post-match interviews might get even more depressing under Mick. It goes to show how costly not getting rid last Christmas really was. At that point we might still have been able to bring in a decent replacement. Instead we really are scraping the barrel here.Lord Kangana wrote:Coyle has got promotion. FFS this is futile. Again.
Mick F*cking McCarthy. I despair.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
Which is funny seeing as I've been saying for ages how shite Coyle is. And you defended him.Lord Kangana wrote:You haven't got a clue either.
Think that record speaks for itself!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
If we are to sack Coyle, I'd love Di Canio in.Tals-biggest-fan wrote:Someone said it a few pages back but Paolo Di Canio would be perfect.bedwetter2 wrote:I would think that's right. To me it looks like he has lost the dressing room. In such circumstances the club will realise fairly quickly that he and some of his team cannot be allowed to stay on as there will be absolutely no improvement possible while he remains.Tals-biggest-fan wrote:Its clear none of the players have any desire to play and i'm guessing its down to the management of the team, Coyle needs to go we need a manage who can motivate a team and doesn't take any less then 100% and won't beat around the bush if we play badly...
My preferred option for a replacement would be a young reasonably successful manager from a lower division together with a wise, older guy who knows the ropes. Bruce Rioch could well be the right sort of person to bring in to act as the wise head/sounding board, perhaps given the title of Director of Football rather than assistant manager.
No more ex players though, please.
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
Tals-biggest-fan wrote:Couldn't give a shit about his views , I'm not here to study his life i'm here to support my team and watch my team win.. Paolo Di Canio has won 40 of his 63 games at Swindon and went from havin no respect from the Swindon team to having the entire team at his feet, he took control of the locker room and took them from being relegated in 10-11 season to winning the league in 11-12 he's got a smaller budget then what we have at Swindon and he makes it work because he doesn't take excuses from anyone he demands respect and demands 100% every single game for 90 minutes.Sponge wrote:A fascist? No thanks.Tals-biggest-fan wrote:Someone said it a few pages back but Paolo Di Canio would be perfect.bedwetter2 wrote:I would think that's right. To me it looks like he has lost the dressing room. In such circumstances the club will realise fairly quickly that he and some of his team cannot be allowed to stay on as there will be absolutely no improvement possible while he remains.Tals-biggest-fan wrote:Its clear none of the players have any desire to play and i'm guessing its down to the management of the team, Coyle needs to go we need a manage who can motivate a team and doesn't take any less then 100% and won't beat around the bush if we play badly...
My preferred option for a replacement would be a young reasonably successful manager from a lower division together with a wise, older guy who knows the ropes. Bruce Rioch could well be the right sort of person to bring in to act as the wise head/sounding board, perhaps given the title of Director of Football rather than assistant manager.
No more ex players though, please.
+2
Di Canio all the way been saying it for a few months now
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
-
- Promising
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 1:24 pm
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
Owen Coyle. I despair. End of story.Lord Kangana wrote:Coyle has got promotion. FFS this is futile. Again.
Mick F*cking McCarthy. I despair.
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
Please not Mick.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
You don't replace a failure with another failure. This "anyone but Coyle" mentality annoys me. Yeah, he's doing poor but until we have a suitable replacement lined up, we can't sack him because there are worse managers out there. Sack Coyle, pay him a load of money, sign McCarty, stagnate, pay him a load of money when we sack him, sign Brown, stagnate, sack him and spend even more, all whilst the quality we have leave us.
No. It's pathetic and we deserve better than that. Get rid of Coyle? Fine, but we should not settle for a mug who will not improve the club. You may not think anyone can be worse than Coyle but the likes of McCarthy are no better and we shouldn't settle for that.
No. It's pathetic and we deserve better than that. Get rid of Coyle? Fine, but we should not settle for a mug who will not improve the club. You may not think anyone can be worse than Coyle but the likes of McCarthy are no better and we shouldn't settle for that.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
As Bruce Rioja said... Hierro.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
No prophet is well-received in his own land.SmokinFrazier wrote:You don't replace a failure with another failure. This "anyone but Coyle" mentality annoys me. Yeah, he's doing poor but until we have a suitable replacement lined up, we can't sack him because there are worse managers out there. Sack Coyle, pay him a load of money, sign McCarty, stagnate, pay him a load of money when we sack him, sign Brown, stagnate, sack him and spend even more, all whilst the quality we have leave us.
No. It's pathetic and we deserve better than that. Get rid of Coyle? Fine, but we should not settle for a mug who will not improve the club. You may not think anyone can be worse than Coyle but the likes of McCarthy are no better and we shouldn't settle for that.
Hierro interests me though.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
I don't get this 'failure' thing. Get a totally unproven manager cos nothing has ever gone wrong for em?
All managers will have good and bad parts in their careers as are sacked from clubs accordingly.
For all we know Hierro could be the next Sammy Lee as much as the next Mourinho.
I'm certainly not championing McCarthy, just knocking the ridiculous suggestion that he would be no better than Coyle. It seriously is shocking, a change is needed because we are going backwards at a rate of not. And because we left it so late, beggars cannot be choosers!
All managers will have good and bad parts in their careers as are sacked from clubs accordingly.
For all we know Hierro could be the next Sammy Lee as much as the next Mourinho.
I'm certainly not championing McCarthy, just knocking the ridiculous suggestion that he would be no better than Coyle. It seriously is shocking, a change is needed because we are going backwards at a rate of not. And because we left it so late, beggars cannot be choosers!
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
You and all the other 'experts' have been telling us all season that 4-5-1 was the answer...BWFC_Insane wrote:Which is funny seeing as I've been saying for ages how shite Coyle is.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1276
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:07 pm
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
Coyle: "We have to start keeping clean sheets and stop leaking soft goals."
no fecking shit.
no fecking shit.
NEIL LENNON'S SUPERWHITE ARMY
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
And whilst we are talking failure, Newcastle fans were up in arms about appointing that 'failure' Pardew. Wonder what they say now!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
The Mrs just said that too.Tals-biggest-fan wrote:Coyle: "We have to start keeping clean sheets and stop leaking soft goals."
no fecking shit.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
Thank feck we have 2 weeks off.
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
Probably thank feck we didn't hire McCarthy.BWFC_Insane wrote:And whilst we are talking failure, Newcastle fans were up in arms about appointing that 'failure' Pardew. Wonder what they say now!
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
Thing is we can't even blame it on 442
It's obvious the players don't want to play for him and on top of that he's just a cvnt
It's obvious the players don't want to play for him and on top of that he's just a cvnt
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:09 am
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
We have to hire Billy Davies when Coyle goes IMO.
He had two full seasons with Preston, two play-off spot finishes. He then got a poor Derby side promoted in his first season, though it didn't work out in the PL. Then at Forest in his first two full seasons he took them to consecutive third places. None of these teams were that great, yet he got the best out of them.
He had two full seasons with Preston, two play-off spot finishes. He then got a poor Derby side promoted in his first season, though it didn't work out in the PL. Then at Forest in his first two full seasons he took them to consecutive third places. None of these teams were that great, yet he got the best out of them.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
Aye Billy Davies sounds ok to me!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm
Re: 'Ull V Bolton
AgreedSmokinFrazier wrote:You don't replace a failure with another failure. This "anyone but Coyle" mentality annoys me. Yeah, he's doing poor but until we have a suitable replacement lined up, we can't sack him because there are worse managers out there. Sack Coyle, pay him a load of money, sign McCarty, stagnate, pay him a load of money when we sack him, sign Brown, stagnate, sack him and spend even more, all whilst the quality we have leave us.
No. It's pathetic and we deserve better than that. Get rid of Coyle? Fine, but we should not settle for a mug who will not improve the club. You may not think anyone can be worse than Coyle but the likes of McCarthy are no better and we shouldn't settle for that.
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: TANGODANCER and 45 guests