If Coyle gets the sack
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Can't be done. It creates a paradox like when you lick your own elbow.Wandering Willy wrote:Some self banulation needed here.CrazyHorse wrote:You know in all seriousness, the only name that ticks all the boxes is Gary Megson.
I'm not suggesting we get Megson in, God no.
But he's definitely the best man for the job. And more depressingly, that's exactly the sort of cnt who will take over from Coyle.
Businesswoman of the year.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Relegated them both too. One had 15 points when they went down, the other had 24. Coyle missed out by a goal at Stoke.BWFC_Insane wrote:
And has promoted both Sunderland and Wolves to the premiership.
Last edited by Wandering Willy on Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
No we need someone with a plan, ambition, determination and an ego like big Sam!CrazyHorse wrote:Can't be done. It creates a paradox like when you lick your own elbow.Wandering Willy wrote:Some self banulation needed here.CrazyHorse wrote:You know in all seriousness, the only name that ticks all the boxes is Gary Megson.
I'm not suggesting we get Megson in, God no.
But he's definitely the best man for the job. And more depressingly, that's exactly the sort of cnt who will take over from Coyle.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Well, a plan that works, preferably!Hoboh wrote:No we need someone with a plan, ambition, determination and an ego like big Sam!CrazyHorse wrote:Can't be done. It creates a paradox like when you lick your own elbow.Wandering Willy wrote:Some self banulation needed here.CrazyHorse wrote:You know in all seriousness, the only name that ticks all the boxes is Gary Megson.
I'm not suggesting we get Megson in, God no.
But he's definitely the best man for the job. And more depressingly, that's exactly the sort of cnt who will take over from Coyle.
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
ahh - the power of selective evidence-mongering!BWFC_Insane wrote:
And has promoted both Sunderland and Wolves to the premiership.
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Mad Mick makes Megson look like Mr Personality!
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Wikipedia has this to say:CrazyHorse wrote:Can't be done. It creates a paradox like when you lick your own elbow.Wandering Willy wrote:Some self banulation needed here.CrazyHorse wrote:You know in all seriousness, the only name that ticks all the boxes is Gary Megson.
I'm not suggesting we get Megson in, God no.
But he's definitely the best man for the job. And more depressingly, that's exactly the sort of cnt who will take over from Coyle.
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia wrote: Crazy Horses's paradoxes are a set of philosophical problems generally thought to have been devised by Bolton philosopher Crazy Horse of Burnden Park (ca. 1970–present) to support Rioja's doctrine that "all is one" and that, contrary to the evidence of our senses, the belief in plurality and change is mistaken, and in particular that motion is nothing but an illusion. It is usually assumed that Crazy took on the project of creating these paradoxes because other philosophers had created paradoxes against Rioja's view. Thus CrazyHorse can be interpreted as saying that to assume there is plurality is even more absurd than assuming there is only "the One". TheBish makes BWFC-insane claim that CrazyHorse and Bruce Rioja were essentially arguing exactly the opposite point.
The most famous paradox is the paradox of licking one’s own elbow, in which it is proposed that the movement of the tongue towards the elbow propagates potentiality waves throughout the known universe which causes Owen Coyle to pick 4-4-2 formations to counterbalance the potentiality waves.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Wikipedia has this to say:CrazyHorse wrote:Can't be done. It creates a paradox like when you lick your own elbow.Wandering Willy wrote:Some self banulation needed here.CrazyHorse wrote:You know in all seriousness, the only name that ticks all the boxes is Gary Megson.
I'm not suggesting we get Megson in, God no.
But he's definitely the best man for the job. And more depressingly, that's exactly the sort of cnt who will take over from Coyle.Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia wrote: Crazy Horses's paradoxes are a set of philosophical problems generally thought to have been devised by Bolton philosopher Crazy Horse of Burnden Park (ca. 1970–present) to support Rioja's doctrine that "all is one" and that, contrary to the evidence of our senses, the belief in plurality and change is mistaken, and in particular that motion is nothing but an illusion. It is usually assumed that Crazy took on the project of creating these paradoxes because other philosophers had created paradoxes against Rioja's view. Thus CrazyHorse can be interpreted as saying that to assume there is plurality is even more absurd than assuming there is only "the One". TheBish makes BWFC-insane claim that CrazyHorse and Bruce Rioja were essentially arguing exactly the opposite point.
The most famous paradox is the paradox of licking one’s own elbow, in which it is proposed that the movement of the tongue towards the elbow propagates potentiality waves throughout the known universe which causes Owen Coyle to pick 4-4-2 formations to counterbalance the potentiality waves.

- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Lets be fair, when he relegated them he only got the job in March.Wandering Willy wrote:Relegated them both too. One had 15 points when they went down, the other had 24. Coyle missed out by a goal at Stoke.BWFC_Insane wrote:
And has promoted both Sunderland and Wolves to the premiership.
Yes after he took them up he was sacked before he relegated them, BUT they didn't have any money and he'd done well to simply take em back up.
He kept Wolves up for two seasons, their best spell in 30 odd years.
I'd like better, I hope there is better out there, but he's got enough on his CV and his personality is such, that I think he'd be ok here.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
If we're counting that one - he relegated them twice.BWFC_Insane wrote:Lets be fair, when he relegated them he only got the job in March.Wandering Willy wrote:Relegated them both too. One had 15 points when they went down, the other had 24. Coyle missed out by a goal at Stoke.BWFC_Insane wrote:
And has promoted both Sunderland and Wolves to the premiership.
Yes after he took them up he was sacked before he relegated them, BUT they didn't have any money and he'd done well to simply take em back up.
He kept Wolves up for two seasons, their best spell in 30 odd years.
I'd like better, I hope there is better out there, but he's got enough on his CV and his personality is such, that I think he'd be ok here.

They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Any excuse to post this really...


- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Goddam brilliant. I told you he had ace physiognomy. Mick in!
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
If we got Mick "Mick" McCarthy in we'd no doubt get Terry Christian as assistant (or whatever his name is) and the fat Wolves kit man and Mick's brother as physio and his sister-in-law as press officer and whatnot.
Are these jokers going to be any better than the current Burnley rejects we have running the show now?
Are these jokers going to be any better than the current Burnley rejects we have running the show now?
Businesswoman of the year.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Cheeky bastard. I'm 26.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:1970
Businesswoman of the year.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Any excuse to post this really...

May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
thats is ace
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Despite BWFCi's rumours to the contrary, Chris Eagles claims the lads are right behind Coyle?
(Today's BN.)
(Today's BN.)
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
I thought oirish jokes were banned. Ah I see what you did there, you can't ban yourself.CrazyHorse wrote:If we got Mick "Mick" McCarthy in we'd no doubt get Terry Christian as assistant (or whatever his name is) and the fat Wolves kit man and Mick's brother as physio and his sister-in-law as press officer and whatnot.
You sure?CrazyHorse wrote:Cheeky bastard. I'm 26.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:1970
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
Honestly, no.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:You sure?CrazyHorse wrote:Cheeky bastard. I'm 26.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:1970
But 1970 would make me 42 and I'm nothing like that. Not even remotely close.
1972 if you don't mind, turned 40 a couple of months ago.
Businesswoman of the year.
Re: If Coyle gets the sack
If by lads, he means himself, Mears and The 3 Stooges, I can believe himTANGODANCER wrote:Despite BWFCi's rumours to the contrary, Chris Eagles claims the lads are right behind Coyle?
(Today's BN.)
Sto ut Serviam
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: TANGODANCER and 37 guests