Now he's gone, who's next?

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Locked

Who would you like to see replacing Owen Coyle?

Alan Curbishley
15
12%
Paolo di Canio
9
7%
Billy Davies
9
7%
Keith Hill
5
4%
Roy Keane
1
1%
Mick McCarthy
12
9%
Gary Neville
10
8%
A rising lower-league boss (eg Micky Mellon)
11
9%
BWFC legend (eg Hierro/Gudni/McGinlay)
10
8%
Someone from abroad (eg Solskjaer)
35
27%
Someone from within (LSL/Jiminho/Didsy/Zico)
3
2%
AN Other
8
6%
 
Total votes: 128

Norpig
Promising
Promising
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Norpig » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:38 pm

Tucking Fypo wrote:James Beattie was at Bolton train station today, talking about contracts on the phone whilst in the waiting room. Then he got off at Horwich Parkway, around 12:15.

Player? Manager? Coincidence? I'll let you decide.
Saw him in Halfords he is there new manager :o

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by boltonboris » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:42 pm

The same James Beattie who most probably lives in the area?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Relentless09
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1284
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Relentless09 » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:48 pm

thebish wrote:
Relentless09 wrote:Politics, ideological views and religion should have nothing to do with football. If Di Caneo is the man to take us up and provide a stable long term plan, who cares about his so called views ? Now it would be different if he only played white Christian players and delibrately didn't play/sign other races and religions, that would be a complete disgrace

you appear to be contradicting yourself!

and I disagree with your first clause... I, personally, would not want a self-confessed racist managing our club. I think a football club is about MORE than football - it is also about local community and identity. so - I think political ideology CAN be important.

I'm just genuinely unsure about all the claims that surround Di Canio. I wanted to know if anyone on here really knew anything about what he actually believes and how that affects the way he makes decisions or lives his life... but it seems nobody does..

As it happens, I wouldn't have di canio (if it was my choice) simply because he seems a bit unstable to me - and I think we need summat solid and dependable at this particular juncture!
I didn't think I was contradicting myself and certainly didn't mean too. I'm just saying those 3 views shouldn't be allowed in football and I was giving an example of how it might happen in football and if that example was happening, it would be a disgrace

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by thebish » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:51 pm

Relentless09 wrote:
thebish wrote:
Relentless09 wrote:Politics, ideological views and religion should have nothing to do with football. If Di Caneo is the man to take us up and provide a stable long term plan, who cares about his so called views ? Now it would be different if he only played white Christian players and delibrately didn't play/sign other races and religions, that would be a complete disgrace

you appear to be contradicting yourself!

and I disagree with your first clause... I, personally, would not want a self-confessed racist managing our club. I think a football club is about MORE than football - it is also about local community and identity. so - I think political ideology CAN be important.

I'm just genuinely unsure about all the claims that surround Di Canio. I wanted to know if anyone on here really knew anything about what he actually believes and how that affects the way he makes decisions or lives his life... but it seems nobody does..

As it happens, I wouldn't have di canio (if it was my choice) simply because he seems a bit unstable to me - and I think we need summat solid and dependable at this particular juncture!
I didn't think I was contradicting myself and certainly didn't mean too. I'm just saying those 3 views shouldn't be allowed in football and I was giving an example of how it might happen in football and if that example was happening, it would be a disgrace
oh - i must have misunderstood you! it looked like you were saying we shouldn't care about someone's ideological views in football management - and then you described some ideological views that you thought would be a disgrace in football manager...

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by TANGODANCER » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:03 pm

The '"Hail", salute, raising an arm to show respect, and the swastika emblem go way back in history, long before people made them mean something else for their own ends. Despite whoever used them, the salute and the emblem are remembered more in people's heads than in reality. Never knew a sign that killed anybody, just the people waving them about. The Cross and the Star and Crescent spring to mind. You could add the Union Jack, Stars and Stripes, Rising Sun, Star of David, Hammer and Sickle and a whole lot more to them where killing people are concerned. .
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by plymouth wanderer » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:07 pm

Could't be bothered to see if it's been posted

But

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news ... -at-Bolton" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by thebish » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:27 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:Could't be bothered to see if it's been posted

But

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news ... -at-Bolton" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
it has - accompanied by some mirth!

why are the calling one of the other possibles Ole Gunnary Solskjaer?

Relentless09
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1284
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Relentless09 » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:42 pm

If anyone is interested, Nixon is playing his games and giving some hints. Gary Neville was suggested he replied something like if you want a pundit with class who is the best ? Wilkins and Hoddle were mentioned, he said no, says he tells it how it is because he's been out there and he would scare the sh*te out of you

mrpiccollo
Promising
Promising
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:00 am

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by mrpiccollo » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:44 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:Could't be bothered to see if it's been posted

But

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news ... -at-Bolton" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

allways hated how we let Campo leave the club he really did everything he could for the team and was a great player for us, i personally would love to see campo back at bolton be that in an assistant manager position or as full manager.


though its sad to see a former club legend in coyle leave and be lauded by the media as a great manager after all he hasnt done for us in the past 2 years id still have someone with club experience here over anyone else i recall someone posting the HIERRO CAMPO team as something possible and personally would love to see some of our most experienced and loved players back at bolton.


heres hoping our next managerial apointment is someone who can attract players and have us put out a side that doesent buckle under the slightest pressure like we have had recently^^
Image
Image

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:52 pm

Relentless09 wrote:If anyone is interested, Nixon is playing his games and giving some hints. Gary Neville was suggested he replied something like if you want a pundit with class who is the best ? Wilkins and Hoddle were mentioned, he said no, says he tells it how it is because he's been out there and he would scare the sh*te out of you
George Best???

Who's a good pundit? Alan Hanson? Andy Townsend?

I think I'm hot on the case of our next manager here, we'll sniff him out in no time!
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

Sponge
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Sponge » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:55 pm

Armchair Wanderer wrote:
Relentless09 wrote:If anyone is interested, Nixon is playing his games and giving some hints. Gary Neville was suggested he replied something like if you want a pundit with class who is the best ? Wilkins and Hoddle were mentioned, he said no, says he tells it how it is because he's been out there and he would scare the sh*te out of you
George Best???

Who's a good pundit? Alan Hanson? Andy Townsend?

I think I'm hot on the case of our next manager here, we'll sniff him out in no time!

Alan Shearer? :shock: :hang:

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31616
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:56 pm

I've done a little asking about Paolo di Canio. I know a few Swindon fans, and the club has in the past had some dealings with us. And the sense I'm very strongly getting is that we should stay away. Nothing to do with Di Canio's political beliefs (if they exist): just his man-management and the general carnage that surrounds it.

"Everything goes through the media," says one source. "It terrifies the club." Most fans ended up backing him in the argument with goalkeeper Wes Foderingham but fear that it may have emboldened him to do more of the same: public humiliation, trial by media.

And it's not just his underlings: after the tribunal fee triggered an FFP-enforced transfer embargo, PdC couldn't wait to tell the media how the board needed to sort this out and needed to back him financially if they want another promotion – something Swindon fans could barely believe given the amount they've paid in transfers and (notably) agent fees and the subsequent strength of their squad: "He's got two or three good players for every position except goalkeeper, which is his own fault."

There is disquiet that his confrontational methods, which have worked so far, will get less respect as he moves (or they move) up the divisions. Some of the newer players brought in from Championship level have found themselves "in and out of the team" after quietly enquiring why Swindon were doing double training as a matter of course rather than necessity. Of course, after the allegedly lax regime Bolton have had, the idea of a confrontational manager who has them in all day might sound like sweet music to the ears of disenchanted Wanderers, but I would worry that Di Canio might go too far in the other direction, too soon.

You simply don't get the impression he picks his fights or keeps things in-house, as a certain purple-faced septuagenarian down the road tends to do. I dislike stereotypes but evidence suggests that Di Canio's a hot-head - not because he's Italian or Roman, but he just is. And I that his personality type simply won't work higher up the league, or at least won't work for long and won't work for all players. Ostracising a lower-league player costs a lot less than sidelining someone like, for instance, Martin Petrov. One word used to describe him was "bully". Players who've been around a bit tend not to react well to that sort of thing: they just mark time and sit out their contracts, contrary to the system set up by Eddie Davies and Phil Gartside (and willingly signed up to by Owen Coyle).

The Swindon folks I spoke to suspect "it will all end badly" - whether in "financial meltdown" or him walking out, either for a better job or if it all goes wrong. They think he'd be interested in the job and whispers have already started to that effect, although that could well be the media looking to hoist an entertaining manager closer to the spotlight.

I'm glad Paolo di Canio exists, but I'm glad he doesn't manage my club. Not because of any suspect politics, but because of suspect management: I fear he may in time turn out to be an overspending autodidact media whore who thinks himself better than any club he's at. So no thanks.

Sponge
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Sponge » Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:04 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:I've done a little asking about Paolo di Canio. I know a few Swindon fans, and the club has in the past had some dealings with us. And the sense I'm very strongly getting is that we should stay away. Nothing to do with Di Canio's political beliefs (if they exist): just his man-management and the general carnage that surrounds it.

"Everything goes through the media," says one source. "It terrifies the club." Most fans ended up backing him in the argument with goalkeeper Wes Foderingham but fear that it may have emboldened him to do more of the same: public humiliation, trial by media.

And it's not just his underlings: after the tribunal fee triggered an FFP-enforced transfer embargo, PdC couldn't wait to tell the media how the board needed to sort this out and needed to back him financially if they want another promotion – something Swindon fans could barely believe given the amount they've paid in transfers and (notably) agent fees and the subsequent strength of their squad: "He's got two or three good players for every position except goalkeeper, which is his own fault."

There is disquiet that his confrontational methods, which have worked so far, will get less respect as he moves (or they move) up the divisions. Some of the newer players brought in from Championship level have found themselves "in and out of the team" after quietly enquiring why Swindon were doing double training as a matter of course rather than necessity. Of course, after the allegedly lax regime Bolton have had, the idea of a confrontational manager who has them in all day might sound like sweet music to the ears of disenchanted Wanderers, but I would worry that Di Canio might go too far in the other direction, too soon.

You simply don't get the impression he picks his fights or keeps things in-house, as a certain purple-faced septuagenarian down the road tends to do. I dislike stereotypes but evidence suggests that Di Canio's a hot-head - not because he's Italian or Roman, but he just is. And I that his personality type simply won't work higher up the league, or at least won't work for long and won't work for all players. Ostracising a lower-league player costs a lot less than sidelining someone like, for instance, Martin Petrov. One word used to describe him was "bully". Players who've been around a bit tend not to react well to that sort of thing: they just mark time and sit out their contracts, contrary to the system set up by Eddie Davies and Phil Gartside (and willingly signed up to by Owen Coyle).

The Swindon folks I spoke to suspect "it will all end badly" - whether in "financial meltdown" or him walking out, either for a better job or if it all goes wrong. They think he'd be interested in the job and whispers have already started to that effect, although that could well be the media looking to hoist an entertaining manager closer to the spotlight.

I'm glad Paolo di Canio exists, but I'm glad he doesn't manage my club. Not because of any suspect politics, but because of suspect management: I fear he may in time turn out to be an overspending autodidact media whore who thinks himself better than any club he's at. So no thanks.

Thanks for the informed post. Since you probably know more about football than 90% of us on here, do you see any stand-out candidates? You've probably answered this elsewhere, but who'd be your choice?

Wandering Willy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Wandering Willy » Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:22 pm

keveh wrote:Didn't have a clue which thread to put this in, but I'll be on SSN tonight between 5 - 6.

Just done an interview giving my thoughts on where it went wrong and who I think should be next.

Hopefully didn't give the site too much of a bad name!
Anyone see this? Is there a link around?
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Lord Kangana » Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:23 pm

I think we're going to regret hounding Coyle out of a job. Its clear to anyone he was going to turn it around soon. We were in a false league position. His signings were great.

Have I missed anything else out for about 30 months time?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:08 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
IggyTheDawgster wrote:
Sponge wrote:
IggyTheDawgster wrote:
Verbal wrote:I just don't want a fascist in charge of the playing side of the club, tbh.
But you were okay with someone who openly went to church and prayed to an unknown, Invisible entity?


:crazy:
I know, Crazy isn't it that one man we have just sacked gets by with his beliefs not attacked, Yet a prospective new manager is thrown in the gutter automatically because of his. What is the world coming to.
I dunno, believing in God is somewhat different to hailing a man convicted of serious war crimes as "misunderstood and ethical". IMHO.
I'm coming to this argument late and am not taking sides, but I am a little startled by some of the misinformation.

I think it is quite clear Di Canio used the Italian fascist salute, which Mussolini took from the Romans. Hitler copied this for his Heil Hitler, but this does not mean Di Canio used a German Nazi salute. He has made his fascit views quite clear.

BWFCI says Mussolini was convicted of a serious war crime. This is simply nonsense. Mussolini, his mistress and some 15 members of his cabinet were summarily executed by Italian communist partisans 24 hours after their capture with no trial. Their bodies were treated disgracefully. This does not mean Mussolini would not have been tried for war crimes by the International Military Tribunal or that he would not have been found guilty. We'll never know because he was essentially murdered - in itself a war crime.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by officer_dibble » Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 pm

I think Campo is my favouritest suggestion. Im sure it wouldnt go tits up!

hmmm 90's strikers...mixu paatelainen anyone?

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Worthy4England » Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:28 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:I think we're going to regret hounding Coyle out of a job. Its clear to anyone he was going to turn it around soon. We were in a false league position. His signings were great.

Have I missed anything else out for about 30 months time?
It would have got much, much worse, we'd have been in Div 2 in 30 months time. So we need to compare whoever comes in with that baseline. ;-)

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:33 pm

It seems to me the new manager will have to manage with the players we have as there will not be millions in the kitty. Therefore we will need someone with a game plan and the ability to make our existing (really pretty good for this level) players execute it. I have no idea who this should be but I'm not sure a foreigner is the answer at this stage. I voted for Curbishley in the poll but I would discount my opinions here as I do not know enough about the other candidates. Gartside's track record has not been brilliant since Big Sam, though I was surprised how Coyle lost it last season and couldn't find it this season.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

H. Pedersen
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2438
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Now he's gone, who's next?

Post by H. Pedersen » Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:39 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:Mussolini, his mistress and some 15 members of his cabinet were summarily executed by Italian communist partisans 24 hours after their capture with no trial. Their bodies were treated disgracefully. This does not mean Mussolini would not have been tried for war crimes by the International Military Tribunal or that he would not have been found guilty. We'll never know because he was essentially murdered - in itself a war crime.
I find it hard to condemn people who have been brutally opressed for taking revenge on their opressors. I sort of doubt I would have done anything differently if I was in the position of Ceaușescu's firign squad or Gaddafi's executioners.

Well, I guess I wouldn't have shoved a knife up Gaddafi's rear so it would have been a little different.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests