Now he's gone, who's next?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nager.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
theyre waiting for ole .
obvs
obvs
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
We're relying on this shitrag for our info now, right?The Daily cunting Mail wrote:That Hitler fella, say what you like, at least he made the trains run on timeChurchill/Spitfires! Yay!
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
2 more wins and we have to give JP a shot at it.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
I'm not sure "being given a shot at it" is entirely the professional approach.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
Does jimmy even want it? He talked about "helping out" last night. I certainly wouldnt give it Lee after last time.
Wouldnt surprise me if we waitedfor Solskjaer.
Wouldnt surprise me if we waitedfor Solskjaer.
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
Lord Kangana wrote:The Daily cunting Mail wrote:That Hitler fella, say what you like, at least he made the trains run on timeChurchill/Spitfires! Yay!

- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38820
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/wa ... _Freedman/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Bolton news confirm Freedman approach. Also in several Sunday papers.
Hate to say it, but you know who Freedmans media friend is don't you?
Bolton news confirm Freedman approach. Also in several Sunday papers.
Hate to say it, but you know who Freedmans media friend is don't you?
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
BWFC_Insane wrote:http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/wa ... _Freedman/
Bolton news confirm Freedman approach. Also in several Sunday papers.
Hate to say it, but you know who Freedmans media friend is don't you?
No not Nixon surely
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
BWFC_Insane wrote:http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/wa ... _Freedman/
Bolton news confirm Freedman approach. Also in several Sunday papers.
Hate to say it, but you know who Freedmans media friend is don't you?
Does it begin with N and end in ixon?

I like Freedman and have to say I am relieved Souness is nowhere to be seen.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38820
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
Got it in one. And remember he wrote that article about us wanting 'Owen Coyle mk2'.
Heres one for LK, is Nixon the new Mark Curtis?
Heres one for LK, is Nixon the new Mark Curtis?
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
If we get him we should be able to sign Zaha and he can keep Sordell company on the bench
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
I'm liking the sound of this. If steady and organised sounds boring in interviews then thats sound by me. The way his team plays doesnt imply he is a poor motivator. He's more likely to fit in and move forward with what we already have and if he brings lennie Lawrence along as a mentor all well and good.ChrisC wrote:BWFC_Insane wrote:http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/wa ... _Freedman/
Bolton news confirm Freedman approach. Also in several Sunday papers.
Hate to say it, but you know who Freedmans media friend is don't you?
Does it begin with N and end in ixon?![]()
I like Freedman and have to say I am relieved Souness is nowhere to be seen.
There is an arguement that Phillips should have a chance if he wants it but that's not something that should be commited to quickly and as someone said earlier he may not want it. The first real test for Phillips is on tuesday and the question is will he have the nouse to pick a different team for very different circumstances. With the sort of players we have and the size of the squad it would eeven make sense to play two different teams /systems according to strength of oposition and home/away.
The team we played yesterday would not be able to cope against a team with a strong midfield. Mavis doing well against a weak midfield when we boss possession does not mean he will suddenly be able to do the job against decent players.Surely the evidence of the last 18 months tells us that.
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
Why would he leave Palace for us?? And don't say that because we are a "big" club and Palace aren't.
Can't see any footballing reasons!! They are sitting fourth in the Championsip and playing better football than us, it just doesnt make any footballing sense.
Mind we may pay him a bigger salary and money often talks!!
Acually don't now anything about him, have never heard him speak or even seen a photo of him, not sure that he's ever been to Oz (but then that's irrelevant I guess). So I have no idea if he is a good choice or not.
Can't see any footballing reasons!! They are sitting fourth in the Championsip and playing better football than us, it just doesnt make any footballing sense.

Acually don't now anything about him, have never heard him speak or even seen a photo of him, not sure that he's ever been to Oz (but then that's irrelevant I guess). So I have no idea if he is a good choice or not.
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
I'd say it shows us we should play 4-5-1Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Mavis doing well against a weak midfield when we boss possession does not mean he will suddenly be able to do the job against decent players.Surely the evidence of the last 18 months tells us that.
Sto ut Serviam
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
Ianmooreslovechild wrote:I'm liking the sound of this. If steady and organised sounds boring in interviews then thats sound by me. The way his team plays doesnt imply he is a poor motivator. He's more likely to fit in and move forward with what we already have and if he brings lennie Lawrence along as a mentor all well and good.ChrisC wrote:BWFC_Insane wrote:http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/wa ... _Freedman/
Bolton news confirm Freedman approach. Also in several Sunday papers.
Hate to say it, but you know who Freedmans media friend is don't you?
Does it begin with N and end in ixon?![]()
I like Freedman and have to say I am relieved Souness is nowhere to be seen.
There is an arguement that Phillips should have a chance if he wants it but that's not something that should be commited to quickly and as someone said earlier he may not want it. The first real test for Phillips is on tuesday and the question is will he have the nouse to pick a different team for very different circumstances. With the sort of players we have and the size of the squad it would eeven make sense to play two different teams /systems according to strength of oposition and home/away.
The team we played yesterday would not be able to cope against a team with a strong midfield. Mavis doing well against a weak midfield when we boss possession does not mean he will suddenly be able to do the job against decent players.Surely the evidence of the last 18 months tells us that.

Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
Well certainly if Mavis is playing then in the middle/behind a striker and not as part of a pair. It's not that he doesnt try to do the defensive side of the game. He just isnt very good at it.CAPSLOCK wrote:I'd say it shows us we should play 4-5-1Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Mavis doing well against a weak midfield when we boss possession does not mean he will suddenly be able to do the job against decent players.Surely the evidence of the last 18 months tells us that.
For Freedman it may be a question of which club are more able to put resources behind him should he get them up. Palace have struggled financially and may not be able to back him with money when they're close to getting up or when they have got up.Also in terms of what is already available there is probably better depth and quality in the squad he would be taking on here.
If he wants to spend at palace it seems likely that he would have to sell Zaha.
From a career point of view he would be looking not just at which team he is likely to get up but which offers him the best chance of staying up because ultimately to develop his career that is what he would need to do.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
plymouth wanderer wrote:Ianmooreslovechild wrote:I'm liking the sound of this. If steady and organised sounds boring in interviews then thats sound by me. The way his team plays doesnt imply he is a poor motivator. He's more likely to fit in and move forward with what we already have and if he brings lennie Lawrence along as a mentor all well and good.ChrisC wrote:BWFC_Insane wrote:http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/wa ... _Freedman/
Bolton news confirm Freedman approach. Also in several Sunday papers.
Hate to say it, but you know who Freedmans media friend is don't you?
Does it begin with N and end in ixon?![]()
I like Freedman and have to say I am relieved Souness is nowhere to be seen.
There is an arguement that Phillips should have a chance if he wants it but that's not something that should be commited to quickly and as someone said earlier he may not want it. The first real test for Phillips is on tuesday and the question is will he have the nouse to pick a different team for very different circumstances. With the sort of players we have and the size of the squad it would eeven make sense to play two different teams /systems according to strength of oposition and home/away.
The team we played yesterday would not be able to cope against a team with a strong midfield. Mavis doing well against a weak midfield when we boss possession does not mean he will suddenly be able to do the job against decent players.Surely the evidence of the last 18 months tells us that.

Sorry Plymouth I'm a bit hungover.Am I talking bollox?
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
Sorry bud just realised i quoted the wrong post
But you do talk shit
But you do talk shit

Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Now he's gone, who's next?
FaninOz wrote:Why would he leave Palace for us?? And don't say that because we are a "big" club and Palace aren't.
Can't see any footballing reasons!! They are sitting fourth in the Championsip and playing better football than us, it just doesnt make any footballing sense.Mind we may pay him a bigger salary and money often talks!!
Acually don't now anything about him, have never heard him speak or even seen a photo of him, not sure that he's ever been to Oz (but then that's irrelevant I guess). So I have no idea if he is a good choice or not.

There we go
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests