The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
Did we face any opposition along the way?Lord Kangana wrote:And to answer your question, therein lies the rub. I had to speak directly to an MEP, and have a discourse with a European Commissioner, to find out that the authorship of the Payment Service Directive of 2007 was actually a mostly British concern. And this is where the discussion becomes toxic. Most people haven't the first clue where we have and haven't influence. But we do.
Because Norway can initiate market legislation with the Commission.
I agree that this sort of thing is under discussed, and I keep going on about it because it is the ONLY way to evaluate our EU membership.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The Politics Thread
Yes, but if we were only EEA members, then the changes that were made by the lobbying of MEP's and the European Parliament, including questions being asked, by me amongst others, would not have been possible. In other words, it is less democratic for me. Who, previously, was screwed over by the laissez-faire legislation that originated from our own government. I've experienced European democracy, and I've found it to be more approachable, the complete opposite of the ignorant horseshit I chance upon in The Dialy Mail, for example.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
What was the substance of these changes? Was there any opposition?Lord Kangana wrote:Yes, but if we were only EEA members, then the changes that were made by the lobbying of MEP's
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The Politics Thread
The substance was small, but significant. It would have made a world of difference in our case. The oppostion was, as you well know, from our own government, who were perfectly happy with the "light touch regulation" already on the statute book. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that in my experience of both parliaments, the European one felt less stand-offish and condescending. Amenable, open to suggestion (and criticism! heaven forfend) and more importantly, operated on a basis of constant learning.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
Just a side question, for my own education - when have we ever dispatched Redwood to Europe?
And in what sense is he a 'pygmy'?
And in what sense is he a 'pygmy'?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
So our MEPs were taking on the UK government?!Lord Kangana wrote:The substance was small, but significant. It would have made a world of difference in our case. The oppostion was, as you well know, from our own government, who were perfectly happy with the "light touch regulation" already on the statute book. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that in my experience of both parliaments, the European one felt less stand-offish and condescending. Amenable, open to suggestion (and criticism! heaven forfend) and more importantly, operated on a basis of constant learning.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The Politics Thread
Redwood was just an illustrative example! For the life of me I don't know why he's taken so seriously within The Tory party. And he expounds the kind of one-dimensional views on this that drive me to distraction.
As for the MEPs, they weren't directly taking them on, I'm talking about my democratic rights within the existing framework. I have a right of appeal, and voice, that I wouldn't experience if we switched from EEA to EU. But would still be subject, along with the rest of the UK, to its laws. Ergo, being simply EEA would be less, not more, democratic for the purposes of this discussion than remaining EU.
As for the MEPs, they weren't directly taking them on, I'm talking about my democratic rights within the existing framework. I have a right of appeal, and voice, that I wouldn't experience if we switched from EEA to EU. But would still be subject, along with the rest of the UK, to its laws. Ergo, being simply EEA would be less, not more, democratic for the purposes of this discussion than remaining EU.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
He a serious intellect however strongly you disagree with him and will reason everything he says at length at necessary. He's a been a fellow of All Souls, Oxford for 40 years.Lord Kangana wrote:Redwood was just an illustrative example! For the life of me I don't know why he's taken so seriously within The Tory party. And he expounds the kind of one-dimensional views on this that drive me to distraction.
As for the MEPs, they weren't directly taking them on, I'm talking about my democratic rights within the existing framework. I have a right of appeal, and voice, that I wouldn't experience if we switched from EEA to EU. But would still be subject, along with the rest of the UK, to its laws. Ergo, being simply EEA would be less, not more, democratic for the purposes of this discussion than remaining EU.
Can you explain what you mean by how helpful the EU processes were to you in more detail? Where were you able to appeal that would have been denied without our membership?
Last edited by mummywhycantieatcrayons on Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The Politics Thread
Well, just like our Parliamentary process, I contacted the law-makers directly through my MEP (actually, through someone else's, but I was a spokesperson for a group, so the process remains the same). As far as I understand it, we wouldn't have this democratic right under EEA. Bearing in mind that in the European Parliament you have to have a sponsor MEP to be able to ask questions of a commissioner. And also bear in mind that Norway is also subject to the PSD's, but has no process for individuals to challenge them. If the process is through their own Parliament, then we would never have had the questions asked, as our government saw no merit in them.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9404
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: The Politics Thread
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:He a serious intellect however strongly you disagree with him and will reason everything he says at length at necessary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIwBvjoLyZc" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
Harry Genshaw wrote:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:He a serious intellect however strongly you disagree with him and will reason everything he says at length at necessary.![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIwBvjoLyZc" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That's it?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
I don't understand - did your case call for a 'Decision', in the formal sense of that word in EU law, from the EP?Lord Kangana wrote:Well, just like our Parliamentary process, I contacted the law-makers directly through my MEP (actually, through someone else's, but I was a spokesperson for a group, so the process remains the same). As far as I understand it, we wouldn't have this democratic right under EEA. Bearing in mind that in the European Parliament you have to have a sponsor MEP to be able to ask questions of a commissioner. And also bear in mind that Norway is also subject to the PSD's, but has no process for individuals to challenge them. If the process is through their own Parliament, then we would never have had the questions asked, as our government saw no merit in them.
Or was it about future legislation and not an adjudication on a specific case?
If we were out of the EU, our currency exchange companies operating domestically would not have to abide by PSDs anyway, surely? And then your democratic process would be through your MP as usual.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The Politics Thread
The PSD is a maximum harmonisation piece of legislation. It carries weight in the EEA aswell as the EU. My point stands.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
Domestic currency exchangers in Norway are not subject to PSD.Lord Kangana wrote:The PSD is a maximum harmonisation piece of legislation. It carries weight in the EEA aswell as the EU. My point stands.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The Politics Thread
So the Norwegians are allowed to transfer money across borders within the EU but are exempt from PSD's?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Northern Ireland
Re: The Politics Thread
This form of politics youns speak of sounds much more intelligent compared to the my firework can hit a police line 100 metres away.
Re: The Politics Thread
are you two both economics masters - or are you both just running to and from wikipaedia et al??mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Domestic currency exchangers in Norway are not subject to PSD.Lord Kangana wrote:The PSD is a maximum harmonisation piece of legislation. It carries weight in the EEA aswell as the EU. My point stands.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The Politics Thread
Sadly, bish, I've had to live all this. I still have a hard copy of the PSD's somewhere. All 3000 pages with annexes. I love a good bit of EU bureaucracy.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
Not if they are serving customers in the EU.Lord Kangana wrote:So the Norwegians are allowed to transfer money across borders within the EU but are exempt from PSD's?
But what if it is a Norwegian business just serving Norwegians?
Perhaps you're right and this is a very specific and unusual example because it involves the Euro currency?
But are there people operating currency exchanges involving the Euro in, say, China?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
I can't think what I've said that could come from Wikipedia.thebish wrote:are you two both economics masters - or are you both just running to and from wikipaedia et al??mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Domestic currency exchangers in Norway are not subject to PSD.Lord Kangana wrote:The PSD is a maximum harmonisation piece of legislation. It carries weight in the EEA aswell as the EU. My point stands.
I did a law degree which included a the EU as a compulsory module, but perhaps my knowledge isn't detailed enough for the details of currency exchanges, which is LK's area of unfortunate expertise.
Last edited by mummywhycantieatcrayons on Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests