Designated Penalty Taker?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Andrews is rattling them in, why change it?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14516
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Did anybody see N'gog's freekick in the second half yesterday.
That's why he doesn't take penalties. He can't strike the ball cleanly.
That's why he doesn't take penalties. He can't strike the ball cleanly.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
BWFC_Insane wrote:NGog scored two great goals against Charlton. Is that forgotten already?
As for penalties, best penalty taker should take them. Plenty of top strikers haven't been great at penalties.
Andrews fair thumps them in.
Why we would change that I honestly don't know.
Don't try to fix what ain't broke.
I don't think anyone is seriously suggesting we change - rather, asking WHY there are strikers who can't take penalties!! I think it's an interesting question..
how is it that a striker hasn't the confidence/ability to beat a goalie at that range when the goalie has to stay on his line and it is 1-on-1...
apart from a tap-in to an empty net - how is that not a relatively easy position for a striker (someone whose job it is to score goals - who practices all week - and is paid because he has shown a talent for scoring goals) to be in? surely in that position - a striker SHOULD be confident?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Petrov. It's Petrov we need on there.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Liverpool must have had some shit forwards and the midfield couldn't have been up to much in the late 70s early 80's when they had a defender taking them!
I've seen nothing to suggest any of the team aren't confident about taking penalties.
I've seen that Andrews looks comfortable doing so, that's all
I've seen nothing to suggest any of the team aren't confident about taking penalties.
I've seen that Andrews looks comfortable doing so, that's all
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1469
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:05 pm
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
I think the penalty was the only time he touched the ball and it didn't go backwards.
What a hero, What a man...... Ooooh, what a bad foul...
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Can I give you a tiny piece of adviceEnoch wrote:Liverpool must have had some shit forwards and the midfield couldn't have been up to much in the late 70s early 80's when they had a defender taking them!
I've seen nothing to suggest any of the team aren't confident about taking penalties.
I've seen that Andrews looks comfortable doing so, that's all
Ignore if you wish...
You're talking way too much sense, but they'll not listen, so don't bother
That's all
Sto ut Serviam
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Eh? what's that?CAPSLOCK wrote:Can I give you a tiny piece of adviceEnoch wrote:Liverpool must have had some shit forwards and the midfield couldn't have been up to much in the late 70s early 80's when they had a defender taking them!
I've seen nothing to suggest any of the team aren't confident about taking penalties.
I've seen that Andrews looks comfortable doing so, that's all
Ignore if you wish...
You're talking way too much sense, but they'll not listen, so don't bother
That's all

That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Phil Neal (a left back) was deadly from the spotLost Leopard Spot wrote:Eh? what's that?CAPSLOCK wrote:Can I give you a tiny piece of adviceEnoch wrote:Liverpool must have had some shit forwards and the midfield couldn't have been up to much in the late 70s early 80's when they had a defender taking them!
I've seen nothing to suggest any of the team aren't confident about taking penalties.
I've seen that Andrews looks comfortable doing so, that's all
Ignore if you wish...
You're talking way too much sense, but they'll not listen, so don't bother
That's all
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Yeh, I know. CAPS: but they'll not listen... LLS Eh? what's that?jaffka wrote:Phil Neal (a left back) was deadly from the spotLost Leopard Spot wrote:Eh? what's that?CAPSLOCK wrote:Can I give you a tiny piece of adviceEnoch wrote:Liverpool must have had some shit forwards and the midfield couldn't have been up to much in the late 70s early 80's when they had a defender taking them!
I've seen nothing to suggest any of the team aren't confident about taking penalties.
I've seen that Andrews looks comfortable doing so, that's all
Ignore if you wish...
You're talking way too much sense, but they'll not listen, so don't bother
That's all
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
it can all depend upon what mood caps is inLost Leopard Spot wrote:Yeh, I know. CAPS: but they'll not listen... LLS Eh? what's that?jaffka wrote:Phil Neal (a left back) was deadly from the spotLost Leopard Spot wrote:Eh? what's that?CAPSLOCK wrote:Can I give you a tiny piece of adviceEnoch wrote:Liverpool must have had some shit forwards and the midfield couldn't have been up to much in the late 70s early 80's when they had a defender taking them!
I've seen nothing to suggest any of the team aren't confident about taking penalties.
I've seen that Andrews looks comfortable doing so, that's all
Ignore if you wish...
You're talking way too much sense, but they'll not listen, so don't bother
That's all
if he is particularly abrasive today, then he probably means that the op (you) is a prick for raising such a ridiculous point about changing the penalty taker who is doing rather well and also categorising the people who have agreed with you
I could be wrong though, if I am caps, please feel free to correct me
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Sometimes I feel like I'm on another planet...
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
bwfcdan94 wrote:lower confidence then Ngog.Annoyed Grunt wrote:Why, exactly?bwfcdan94 wrote:surely it makes more sense to get Obi Wan Afobe to take the pens. (out of intrest when does his loan end)

I mean....
No on second thoughts, just...*looks at watch*...is 9.30am too early to start drinking?
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
For once, you're notjaffka wrote:
it can all depend upon what mood caps is in
if he is particularly abrasive today, then he probably means that the op (you) is a prick for raising such a ridiculous point about changing the penalty taker who is doing rather well and also categorising the people who have agreed with you
I could be wrong though, if I am caps, please feel free to correct me
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
there we go then, i can read him like a bookCAPSLOCK wrote:For once, you're notjaffka wrote:
it can all depend upon what mood caps is in
if he is particularly abrasive today, then he probably means that the op (you) is a prick for raising such a ridiculous point about changing the penalty taker who is doing rather well and also categorising the people who have agreed with you
I could be wrong though, if I am caps, please feel free to correct me

- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Can I just point out that in the very first post on this subject I had this to say "Don't get me wrong, I'm glad he [Andrews] did [take the penalty], because at least he scored it."
The entire point of the post was one of debate as to why it is that strikers quite often do not take penalties, when IMHO it might (might - that's the point of the debate) be better for their goal scoring confidence if they did.
So, for all you out there that are not quite getting this:
I AM NOT ADVOCATING THAT ANDREWS STOP TAKING THE FECKIN PENALTIES. Ok. I WAS JUST WONDERING WHY SO FEW FECKIN STRIKERS HAVE THE CONFIDENCE TO TAKE THEM.
The entire point of the post was one of debate as to why it is that strikers quite often do not take penalties, when IMHO it might (might - that's the point of the debate) be better for their goal scoring confidence if they did.
So, for all you out there that are not quite getting this:
I AM NOT ADVOCATING THAT ANDREWS STOP TAKING THE FECKIN PENALTIES. Ok. I WAS JUST WONDERING WHY SO FEW FECKIN STRIKERS HAVE THE CONFIDENCE TO TAKE THEM.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Got your CAPSLOCK stuck on there...

- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
YEP. IT'S CALLED 'ANGRY SHOUTY TOUCHY' MODE.ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Got your CAPSLOCK stuck on there...
EDIT: FORGOT THE FECKIN SMILEY - HERE YOU GO

That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: Designated Penalty Taker?
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Can I just point out that in the very first post on this subject I had this to say "Don't get me wrong, I'm glad he [Andrews] did [take the penalty], because at least he scored it."
The entire point of the post was one of debate as to why it is that strikers quite often do not take penalties, when IMHO it might (might - that's the point of the debate) be better for their goal scoring confidence if they did.
So, for all you out there that are not quite getting this:
I AM NOT ADVOCATING THAT ANDREWS STOP TAKING THE FECKIN PENALTIES. Ok. I WAS JUST WONDERING WHY SO FEW FECKIN STRIKERS HAVE THE CONFIDENCE TO TAKE THEM.
here's a bit of advice...
don't bother
there are folk on here are are just plainly too dense to see anything so subtle.
that's all.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: The_Gun and 22 guests