Worthy's better class of transfer thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
We are after this Tollas lad aswell so Dawson & Tollas would replace Knight & Ricketts.wanderers_on_tour wrote:Which would leave us ridiculous short seeing as both players are currently injured/not ready for 90 minutes in the first team...ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Ah see, thats where it falls down a littleCaribbean White wrote:And Ricketts if Nixon is to be believed.ChrisC wrote:Wheater & Dawson in with Mills as backup.. Knight & Ream off into the sunset.Caribbean White wrote:Gregus deal done, Nixon just tweeted, just waiting for International clearance, Nixon also tweeted Dawson deal should go through this week, and cryptically hinted that it could spell trouble for Knight and a few others.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
Why would we get rid of Ricketts? He's our best full back, on either side. I don't see why we'd get rid of Ream either. I'd get rid of Knight and Mears.
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
I can't see the logic behind getting rid of Ricketts & Ream (whom I rate), but the sooner we're shut of Knight the better.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
Watch the games then. Soft, unadulteratedly soft. Not very good either.SmokinFrazier wrote:Why would we get rid of Ricketts? He's our best full back, on either side. I don't see why we'd get rid of Ream either. I'd get rid of Knight and Mears.
Cost us the goal against Millwall. Sloppy.
One of the poorest players I've seen turn out for us in a long time.
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
I'd be keeping Ricketts unless he was on astronomical wages. Merely because he isn't THAT shit, and is versatile.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
I sit in line with the edge of the 18 yard box so I see alot of our defence up close and for me, he is a very very poor CB.. You can guarantee 9 times out of 10 he will get out jumped for the ball.. he has the strength of a child and just gets throw around like a rag doll when things get physical.Beefheart wrote:I can't see the logic behind getting rid of Ricketts & Ream (whom I rate), but the sooner we're shut of Knight the better.
I do think he could make a half decent footballer but not as a CB.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
It's all a bit...unproven?? Sure there's room for improvement in the defence but rather the devil you know to some degree.ChrisC wrote:We are after this Tollas lad aswell so Dawson & Tollas would replace Knight & Ricketts.wanderers_on_tour wrote:
Which would leave us ridiculous short seeing as both players are currently injured/not ready for 90 minutes in the first team...
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
Yet statistically our best period defensively last season was Wheater and Ream I believe. I think he'd be better with Wheater alongside him.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
Is that when we played 4-5-1? ie when they weren't cut quite so far adrift?Beefheart wrote:Yet statistically our best period defensively last season was Wheater and Ream I believe. I think he'd be better with Wheater alongside him.
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
If there is any truth to the idea we might axe Knight and Ricketts I guess its worth keeping in mind that we can do that at any point, it doesn't have to be within the transfer window.
But why get rid of Ricketts anyway? He's competent at left right and centre, not prone to many feck ups, always thought he was one of our most useful players personally.
But why get rid of Ricketts anyway? He's competent at left right and centre, not prone to many feck ups, always thought he was one of our most useful players personally.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
You rated him when we were in the Premier League. He's not been great this season but he has potential.BWFC_Insane wrote:Watch the games then. Soft, unadulteratedly soft. Not very good either.SmokinFrazier wrote:Why would we get rid of Ricketts? He's our best full back, on either side. I don't see why we'd get rid of Ream either. I'd get rid of Knight and Mears.
Cost us the goal against Millwall. Sloppy.
One of the poorest players I've seen turn out for us in a long time.
Why people continue to blame him for the Millwall goal is beyond me. He messed up but the penalty was because of Knight's ridiculous challenge. Knight is the one who directly cost us, not Ream.
Wheater and Ream were a good partnership. They were better than any other combination we've seen since Cahill left.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
Wheater with Ricketts, for me.SmokinFrazier wrote:Wheater and Ream were a good partnership. They were better than any other combination we've seen since Cahill left.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
Aside from Tim's brainfart pass that lead to the penalty, he was fine against Millwall. He's also been fine the past couple of games he's played as well. He's clearly benefitting from the regular game time. It wouldn't make sense to fob him, Knight and Ricketts off just because.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
Not sure i'm down with the whole 'fine apart from giving a goal away' argument but the comment ref. improvement with game time is fair enough and it's a trend worth giving a couple more weeks .
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
Good god.SmokinFrazier wrote:You rated him when we were in the Premier League. He's not been great this season but he has potential.BWFC_Insane wrote:Watch the games then. Soft, unadulteratedly soft. Not very good either.SmokinFrazier wrote:Why would we get rid of Ricketts? He's our best full back, on either side. I don't see why we'd get rid of Ream either. I'd get rid of Knight and Mears.
Cost us the goal against Millwall. Sloppy.
One of the poorest players I've seen turn out for us in a long time.
Why people continue to blame him for the Millwall goal is beyond me. He messed up but the penalty was because of Knight's ridiculous challenge. Knight is the one who directly cost us, not Ream.
Wheater and Ream were a good partnership. They were better than any other combination we've seen since Cahill left.
What about when Ream was just bullied off the ball in the second half down by the touchline?
As embarrassing as it gets.
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
It took two brainfarts to lead to the penalty, to be fair. We've said for ages that all our defenders are capable of that mythical "One Mistake A Game". I just don't think we should give up on Ream just yet.ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Not sure i'm down with the whole 'fine apart from giving a goal away' argument but the comment ref. improvement with game time is fair enough and it's a trend worth giving a couple more weeks .
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
SmokinFrazier wrote:You rated him when we were in the Premier League.BWFC_Insane wrote:Watch the games then. Soft, unadulteratedly soft. Not very good either.SmokinFrazier wrote:Why would we get rid of Ricketts? He's our best full back, on either side. I don't see why we'd get rid of Ream either. I'd get rid of Knight and Mears.
Cost us the goal against Millwall. Sloppy.
One of the poorest players I've seen turn out for us in a long time.
I don't think BWFCi did....
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
being in the football press, have you ever contributed any transfer rumours?Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Ah, so it's a Nixon rumour? Hmm...
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
How can you contribute a rumour?jaffka wrote:being in the football press, have you ever contributed any transfer rumours?Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Ah, so it's a Nixon rumour? Hmm...
Re: Worthy's better class of transfer thread
by posting something that you have heardohjimmyjimmy wrote:How can you contribute a rumour?jaffka wrote:being in the football press, have you ever contributed any transfer rumours?Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Ah, so it's a Nixon rumour? Hmm...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], TANGODANCER, The_Gun and 21 guests