Dawson
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Dawson
And, further to the West Brom or BWFC debate
Theres not many team in the Prem I would say this about, but if we were in that League, we're a far bigger pull than West Brom
Theres not many team in the Prem I would say this about, but if we were in that League, we're a far bigger pull than West Brom
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Dawson
I have never bought the size of the clubs into this. We are not Wolves with delusions of grandeur, we know what we are. It is not about 'my dads bigger than your dad'. It is about the fact that Albions management really rate him. They will not let him go, especially if you do come up to a potential relegation rival.
Re: Dawson
FWIW, as good as Dawson is, he does have one weakness that no amount of games will solve
Its a weakness that might expose him in the top league
We shall see
Its a weakness that might expose him in the top league
We shall see
Sto ut Serviam
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Dawson
Porn? Twitter addiction? Cross-dressing?CAPSLOCK wrote:FWIW, as good as Dawson is, he does have one weakness that no amount of games will solve
Its a weakness that might expose him in the top league
We shall see
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: Dawson
It's just the capslock daily trollfest. Let him be.Baggieboy wrote:I have never bought the size of the clubs into this. We are not Wolves with delusions of grandeur, we know what we are. It is not about 'my dads bigger than your dad'. It is about the fact that Albions management really rate him. They will not let him go, especially if you do come up to a potential relegation rival.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: Dawson
Zat Knight?Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Porn? Twitter addiction? Cross-dressing?CAPSLOCK wrote:FWIW, as good as Dawson is, he does have one weakness that no amount of games will solve
Its a weakness that might expose him in the top league
We shall see
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Dawson
It's a three-month loan. We signed him at the end of January, three months before the end of April. Loans are either window to window (ie to January or June) or month to month up to a maximum of three months; seems West Brom agreed up top to let him come for the maximum three months. Compare our one-month deal with Southampton for De Ridder - extendable if anyone's bothered.SmokinFrazier wrote:I don't understand why the loan deal ends when it does? Assuming other teams slip up and we end up in the play-offs, it'd be a massive oversight to have let Dawson go for those crucial games. Maybe it'll be extended if that does happen.
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9714
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: Dawson
Hmmm. Anyone else notice that BL3 disappears and DSB returns? Suspicious
Just kidding. Good to have you back DSB

Just kidding. Good to have you back DSB

-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Dawson
Whats happening with De Ridder?
Is it good 'de-riddance'?
Is it good 'de-riddance'?
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Dawson
From memory, three: Spearing, Dawson and De Ridder. Gregus is technically on loan but from an overseas club so it doesn't count, as Watford have gleefully noted.CAPSLOCK wrote:re Loans
53.2 Standard Loans. Subject to the provisions of Regulation 52.3, Standard Loan transfers shall only be approved in accordance with following provisions:
53.2.1 Subject to the proviso that the duration of a Standard Loan must be the time between two Transfer Windows, Standard Loans can be for half a Season or a full Season. Any recall clause requiring the early termination of a Standard Loan can only be included in a full Season Standard Loan and this can only be activated during the second (January) Transfer Window. Any other early termination of a Standard Loan must be by way of a mutual agreement in writing (including by way of a recall clause within the Standard Loan Agreement) between both Clubs and the Player but can only be completed after the expiry of 28 days and only during a Transfer Window (but subject to Regulation 53.2.2 below).
53.2.2 A Player whose Standard Loan expires (or terminates) on completion of his Loaning Club's League Matches will not be eligible to play for his Parent Club in any remaining League Matches in that Season notwithstanding the fact that such expiry or termination occurs during a Transfer Window.
53.2.3 Notwithstanding the provisions of Regulation 53.2.1, a Standard Loan of a goalkeeper (but not otherwise) may be subject to a recall clause exercisable at any time. Any recall may only be implemented in extenuating circumstances and with the consent of the Executive, such extenuating circumstances to be determined in the Executive's absolute discretion. A goalkeeper shall not be permitted to resume any Standard Loan following the exercise of a recall.
53.2.4 A Club can have a maximum of 4 Players under 23 and a further 4 Players over 23 on a Standard Loan during any Season. The deadline for determining a Player's age in this respect shall be 30 June prior to the Season in which the Standard Loan is intended to take place.
How many have we had
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Dawson
I'm a BL2 boy m'self. And it's good to be back.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Hmmm. Anyone else notice that BL3 disappears and DSB returns? Suspicious![]()
Just kidding. Good to have you back DSB
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Dawson
Only Spearing of those was a "standard loan" as I understand it anyhow.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:From memory, three: Spearing, Dawson and De Ridder. Gregus is technically on loan but from an overseas club so it doesn't count, as Watford have gleefully noted.CAPSLOCK wrote:re Loans
53.2 Standard Loans. Subject to the provisions of Regulation 52.3, Standard Loan transfers shall only be approved in accordance with following provisions:
53.2.1 Subject to the proviso that the duration of a Standard Loan must be the time between two Transfer Windows, Standard Loans can be for half a Season or a full Season. Any recall clause requiring the early termination of a Standard Loan can only be included in a full Season Standard Loan and this can only be activated during the second (January) Transfer Window. Any other early termination of a Standard Loan must be by way of a mutual agreement in writing (including by way of a recall clause within the Standard Loan Agreement) between both Clubs and the Player but can only be completed after the expiry of 28 days and only during a Transfer Window (but subject to Regulation 53.2.2 below).
53.2.2 A Player whose Standard Loan expires (or terminates) on completion of his Loaning Club's League Matches will not be eligible to play for his Parent Club in any remaining League Matches in that Season notwithstanding the fact that such expiry or termination occurs during a Transfer Window.
53.2.3 Notwithstanding the provisions of Regulation 53.2.1, a Standard Loan of a goalkeeper (but not otherwise) may be subject to a recall clause exercisable at any time. Any recall may only be implemented in extenuating circumstances and with the consent of the Executive, such extenuating circumstances to be determined in the Executive's absolute discretion. A goalkeeper shall not be permitted to resume any Standard Loan following the exercise of a recall.
53.2.4 A Club can have a maximum of 4 Players under 23 and a further 4 Players over 23 on a Standard Loan during any Season. The deadline for determining a Player's age in this respect shall be 30 June prior to the Season in which the Standard Loan is intended to take place.
How many have we had
Add in Afobe (Half a season).
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Dawson
Ah of course, how could I have forgotten BennyBWFC_Insane wrote:Only Spearing of those was a "standard loan" as I understand it anyhow.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:From memory, three: Spearing, Dawson and De Ridder. Gregus is technically on loan but from an overseas club so it doesn't count, as Watford have gleefully noted.CAPSLOCK wrote:53.2.4 A Club can have a maximum of 4 Players under 23 and a further 4 Players over 23 on a Standard Loan during any Season. The deadline for determining a Player's age in this respect shall be 30 June prior to the Season in which the Standard Loan is intended to take place.
How many have we had
Add in Afobe (Half a season).

Re: Dawson
So, not a massive oversight, thenDave Sutton's barnet wrote:It's a three-month loan. We signed him at the end of January, three months before the end of April. Loans are either window to window (ie to January or June) or month to month up to a maximum of three months; seems West Brom agreed up top to let him come for the maximum three months. Compare our one-month deal with Southampton for De Ridder - extendable if anyone's bothered.SmokinFrazier wrote:I don't understand why the loan deal ends when it does? Assuming other teams slip up and we end up in the play-offs, it'd be a massive oversight to have let Dawson go for those crucial games. Maybe it'll be extended if that does happen.
More, the rules?
Odd that somebody who knows football missed that
Freedman out!
Seriously though and my reason for checking the regs, could we not have made it a 'season long loan' til season end, or even Winter to Summer window?
All this of course assumes WBA have no say in it
Sto ut Serviam
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Dawson
I don't think anything in the rules stopped that. I think it was West Brom's decision.CAPSLOCK wrote:So, not a massive oversight, thenDave Sutton's barnet wrote:It's a three-month loan. We signed him at the end of January, three months before the end of April. Loans are either window to window (ie to January or June) or month to month up to a maximum of three months; seems West Brom agreed up top to let him come for the maximum three months. Compare our one-month deal with Southampton for De Ridder - extendable if anyone's bothered.SmokinFrazier wrote:I don't understand why the loan deal ends when it does? Assuming other teams slip up and we end up in the play-offs, it'd be a massive oversight to have let Dawson go for those crucial games. Maybe it'll be extended if that does happen.
More, the rules?
Odd that somebody who knows football missed that
Freedman out!
Seriously though and my reason for checking the regs, could we not have made it a 'season long loan' til season end, or even Winter to Summer window?
All this of course assumes WBA have no say in it
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Dawson
I'd say so. If I'm not mistaken - which happens, occasionally – the loaning club has no right of recall on the "window to window" deals, but can retain it in the month-to-month ones: it's possible West Brom have the right to recall Daws should all their centre-backs get injured.BWFC_Insane wrote:I don't think anything in the rules stopped that. I think it was West Brom's decision.CAPSLOCK wrote:could we not have made it a 'season long loan' til season end, or even Winter to Summer window?
All this of course assumes WBA have no say in it
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Dawson
De Ridder's gone back, says the official twitter.
Steve De Ridder has returned to parent club Southampton following his one-month loan spell with Bolton.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Dawson
Oh well. Didn't exactly make a stunning impact did he.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:De Ridder's gone back, says the official twitter.Steve De Ridder has returned to parent club Southampton following his one-month loan spell with Bolton.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am
Re: Dawson
Ah, fair enough. I was thinking we could have had him until the start of the next transfer window, which would have made a three month deal odd, but thinking about it, I don't think you can have those longer loans midway through the season? I'm not too sure.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:It's a three-month loan. We signed him at the end of January, three months before the end of April. Loans are either window to window (ie to January or June) or month to month up to a maximum of three months; seems West Brom agreed up top to let him come for the maximum three months. Compare our one-month deal with Southampton for De Ridder - extendable if anyone's bothered.SmokinFrazier wrote:I don't understand why the loan deal ends when it does? Assuming other teams slip up and we end up in the play-offs, it'd be a massive oversight to have let Dawson go for those crucial games. Maybe it'll be extended if that does happen.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Dawson
You can – Stoke lent Matthew Upson to Brighton for the rest of the term – so I suspect WBA didn't want us to.SmokinFrazier wrote:Ah, fair enough. I was thinking we could have had him until the start of the next transfer window, which would have made a three month deal odd, but thinking about it, I don't think you can have those longer loans midway through the season? I'm not too sure.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:It's a three-month loan. We signed him at the end of January, three months before the end of April. Loans are either window to window (ie to January or June) or month to month up to a maximum of three months; seems West Brom agreed up top to let him come for the maximum three months. Compare our one-month deal with Southampton for De Ridder - extendable if anyone's bothered.SmokinFrazier wrote:I don't understand why the loan deal ends when it does? Assuming other teams slip up and we end up in the play-offs, it'd be a massive oversight to have let Dawson go for those crucial games. Maybe it'll be extended if that does happen.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests