Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
this ^. Purely in the interests of shedding light on the subject of course.bobo the clown wrote:"come to" ? You're a Canadianish type, not a Yank.Montreal Wanderer wrote:You'll have to come to Virginia then.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:It did occur to me while Amanda Thatcher was reading today that I would be happy to discuss her grandmother's legacy over a coffee with her.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
All sentiments aside, I'm glad, and relieved, the funeral went down as a dignified occasion.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
If you want light, I'm a North American. If you want heat, talk to hoboh.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:this ^. Purely in the interests of shedding light on the subject of course.bobo the clown wrote:"come to" ? You're a Canadianish type, not a Yank.Montreal Wanderer wrote:You'll have to come to Virginia then.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:It did occur to me while Amanda Thatcher was reading today that I would be happy to discuss her grandmother's legacy over a coffee with her.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
That's like me saying "when you next come to Croatia". Which, as opposed to "go" sort of suggests the speaker is there already.Montreal Wanderer wrote:If you want light, I'm a North American. If you want heat, talk to hoboh.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:this ^. Purely in the interests of shedding light on the subject of course.bobo the clown wrote:"come to" ? You're a Canadianish type, not a Yank.Montreal Wanderer wrote:You'll have to come to Virginia then.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:It did occur to me while Amanda Thatcher was reading today that I would be happy to discuss her grandmother's legacy over a coffee with her.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
I can't believe this discussion has descended into farce like this.
It was clear the moment that this exchange happened...
"Fnarr Fnarr"
or
"I bet you do, sir, I bet you do"
or
"Ooh, Matron"
or
"Ooh, you are naughty, but I do like you"
Come on now. Basics people, basics.

It was clear the moment that this exchange happened...
That the correct response would have been something along the lines of:Montreal Wanderer wrote:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:It did occur to me while Amanda Thatcher was reading today that I would be happy to discuss her grandmother's legacy over a coffee with her.
You'll have to come to Virginia then.
"Fnarr Fnarr"
or
"I bet you do, sir, I bet you do"
or
"Ooh, Matron"
or
"Ooh, you are naughty, but I do like you"
Come on now. Basics people, basics.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
You and long John silver are both a pair of knobs anyway so why would I worry about the views of a couple of 'educated' youths? Defend your scrote brothers all you like wait till your generations sprogs are following the lead offered, then I suspect you will be the ones squealing! Full speed ahead to hell in a handcart.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Moron
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
AT lives in a dictatorship Hobes.
He's practically kith and kin.
He's practically kith and kin.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
Lord Kangana wrote:AT lives in a dictatorship Hobes.
He's practically kith and kin.

Guess I'd better start reading Marx again I still cannot figure out what an an equal society is when anyone with a larger income is expected to pay 50% plus in tax as opposed to all paying the same in the green eyes of a socialist.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
Bizarre notion.Hoboh wrote:Lord Kangana wrote:AT lives in a dictatorship Hobes.
He's practically kith and kin.strong leadership and good practise is what I advocate not dictatorship, well at least not in the long term.
Guess I'd better start reading Marx again I still cannot figure out what an an equal society is when anyone with a larger income is expected to pay 50% plus in tax as opposed to all paying the same in the green eyes of a socialist.

Marginal tax rates aside, anyone with a larger income pays the same tax rates.
20% on the first 30-odd K - just like someone who earns just 30-odd K
40% on the amount between 30-odd and 150k
45% on everything over 150k
It's absolutely equal. As soon as someone on 32k goes to 35 or whatever, they cough up the additiona tax.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
Anyway, I missed
But wait
In 1971..
*yes, yes, it wasn't exactly that you pedant...
this week.David Cameron, without a hint of political opportunism, said rather than wrote:We're all Thatcherites now
But wait
In 1971..
and in 2002...Tricky Dicky said rather than wrote: We're all Keynsians now*
Beware the Ides of March, David.Lord Voldermort 1st said rather than wrote:We're all Thatcherites now
*yes, yes, it wasn't exactly that you pedant...
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
Get out of it! equal would mean £10k no tax, No NI (with admin savings) anything above 25%, no matter what they earn above the base level for everyone. That is equal.Worthy4England wrote:Bizarre notion.Hoboh wrote:Lord Kangana wrote:AT lives in a dictatorship Hobes.
He's practically kith and kin.strong leadership and good practise is what I advocate not dictatorship, well at least not in the long term.
Guess I'd better start reading Marx again I still cannot figure out what an an equal society is when anyone with a larger income is expected to pay 50% plus in tax as opposed to all paying the same in the green eyes of a socialist.![]()
Marginal tax rates aside, anyone with a larger income pays the same tax rates.
20% on the first 30-odd K - just like someone who earns just 30-odd K
40% on the amount between 30-odd and 150k
45% on everything over 150k
It's absolutely equal. As soon as someone on 32k goes to 35 or whatever, they cough up the additiona tax.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
No, that's a regressive taxation system. Go look it up.Hoboh wrote:Get out of it! equal would mean £10k no tax, No NI (with admin savings) anything above 25%, no matter what they earn above the base level for everyone. That is equal.Worthy4England wrote:Bizarre notion.Hoboh wrote:Lord Kangana wrote:AT lives in a dictatorship Hobes.
He's practically kith and kin.strong leadership and good practise is what I advocate not dictatorship, well at least not in the long term.
Guess I'd better start reading Marx again I still cannot figure out what an an equal society is when anyone with a larger income is expected to pay 50% plus in tax as opposed to all paying the same in the green eyes of a socialist.![]()
Marginal tax rates aside, anyone with a larger income pays the same tax rates.
20% on the first 30-odd K - just like someone who earns just 30-odd K
40% on the amount between 30-odd and 150k
45% on everything over 150k
It's absolutely equal. As soon as someone on 32k goes to 35 or whatever, they cough up the additiona tax.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
As the rules stand it's the same for everyone.Hoboh wrote:Get out of it! equal would mean £10k no tax, No NI (with admin savings) anything above 25%, no matter what they earn above the base level for everyone. That is equal.Worthy4England wrote:Bizarre notion.Hoboh wrote:Lord Kangana wrote:AT lives in a dictatorship Hobes.
He's practically kith and kin.strong leadership and good practise is what I advocate not dictatorship, well at least not in the long term.
Guess I'd better start reading Marx again I still cannot figure out what an an equal society is when anyone with a larger income is expected to pay 50% plus in tax as opposed to all paying the same in the green eyes of a socialist.![]()
Marginal tax rates aside, anyone with a larger income pays the same tax rates.
20% on the first 30-odd K - just like someone who earns just 30-odd K
40% on the amount between 30-odd and 150k
45% on everything over 150k
It's absolutely equal. As soon as someone on 32k goes to 35 or whatever, they cough up the additiona tax.
In effect your method would make society less equal. Because those earning £200K a year would be even richer than those earning £20K than they are with the current taxation system!
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
Ah, the picture-perfect ideals of the right-wing...BWFC_Insane wrote:As the rules stand it's the same for everyone.Hoboh wrote:Get out of it! equal would mean £10k no tax, No NI (with admin savings) anything above 25%, no matter what they earn above the base level for everyone. That is equal.Worthy4England wrote:Bizarre notion.Hoboh wrote:Lord Kangana wrote:AT lives in a dictatorship Hobes.
He's practically kith and kin.strong leadership and good practise is what I advocate not dictatorship, well at least not in the long term.
Guess I'd better start reading Marx again I still cannot figure out what an an equal society is when anyone with a larger income is expected to pay 50% plus in tax as opposed to all paying the same in the green eyes of a socialist.![]()
Marginal tax rates aside, anyone with a larger income pays the same tax rates.
20% on the first 30-odd K - just like someone who earns just 30-odd K
40% on the amount between 30-odd and 150k
45% on everything over 150k
It's absolutely equal. As soon as someone on 32k goes to 35 or whatever, they cough up the additiona tax.
In effect your method would make society less equal. Because those earning £200K a year would be even richer than those earning £20K than they are with the current taxation system!
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
Apparently, dating laws state that the youngest you can go is half your age plus 7. I can now hear lots of frantic mental maths going on.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:And you are over twice her age, no?!BWFC_Insane wrote:Really? Does nowt for me. Looks like a less fit version of Billie Piper.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:It did occur to me while Amanda Thatcher was reading today that I would be happy to discuss her grandmother's legacy over a coffee with her.
Each to their own I guess.
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
Blimey, nobody younger than 43 then?Bijou Bob wrote:Apparently, dating laws state that the youngest you can go is half your age plus 7. I can now hear lots of frantic mental maths going on.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:And you are over twice her age, no?!BWFC_Insane wrote:Really? Does nowt for me. Looks like a less fit version of Billie Piper.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:It did occur to me while Amanda Thatcher was reading today that I would be happy to discuss her grandmother's legacy over a coffee with her.
Each to their own I guess.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
Well that rules her out for me too. Hmmm.Bijou Bob wrote:Apparently, dating laws state that the youngest you can go is half your age plus 7. I can now hear lots of frantic mental maths going on.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:And you are over twice her age, no?!BWFC_Insane wrote:Really? Does nowt for me. Looks like a less fit version of Billie Piper.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:It did occur to me while Amanda Thatcher was reading today that I would be happy to discuss her grandmother's legacy over a coffee with her.
Each to their own I guess.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
I'm in! Just.
Fnarr.
Fnarr.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
Fnarr, fnyuk.Prufrock wrote:I'm in! Just.
Fnarr.
Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?
Sadly, I'm just out on Avril Lavigne.
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Prufrock and 11 guests