Dougie

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Dougie

Post by LeverEnd » Tue May 21, 2013 8:48 pm

Problem is BWFCI you admit generally that Dougie makes mistakes but when any are pointed out you go on the defensive. Can I ask what mistakes he has made specifically? I mean, we can all make a case for any system or combination of players if we want to play devil's advocate but you seem to do this all the time.
I agree with most of what you say about Dougie, very impressed with him, but let's not be blind to his occasional and inevitable mistakes. Seems daft when almost all of us think he's doing a good job.
...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38896
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Dougie

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue May 21, 2013 9:00 pm

LeverEnd wrote:Problem is BWFCI you admit generally that Dougie makes mistakes but when any are pointed out you go on the defensive. Can I ask what mistakes he has made specifically? I mean, we can all make a case for any system or combination of players if we want to play devil's advocate but you seem to do this all the time.
I agree with most of what you say about Dougie, very impressed with him, but let's not be blind to his occasional and inevitable mistakes. Seems daft when almost all of us think he's doing a good job.
People judge mistakes in the wrong way. Team selections can always be questioned. Nobody can say whether they are definitively right or wrong by the very nature. His worst team selection for me was the 4-4-2 he played against Sheffield Wednesday at home. No doubt many would have liked it.

I look more in general at how the club is managed, the direction of travel, the noises that come from within and the manager.

It's why I went to the fans forums to hear Coyle out. But there was just no substance.

So far Dougie seems very different.

Enoch
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:08 pm
Location: The Garden of England.

Re: Dougie

Post by Enoch » Tue May 21, 2013 9:18 pm

As with love and hate, it can be a fine line between mistake and genius. It wasn't so long ago a chorus of 'You don't know what you're doing' rang out at The Reebok just before two sub's netted one apiece to win the game.

Without knowing the reasoning behind any decision, or what factors contributed to it, who's to judge? If Hall's cracking strike had gone in 'early doors' against Blackpool, it may well have turned out to be a stroke of genius.

As it stands, it's gone down as a clanger.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Dougie

Post by thebish » Tue May 21, 2013 9:32 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
LeverEnd wrote:Problem is BWFCI you admit generally that Dougie makes mistakes but when any are pointed out you go on the defensive. Can I ask what mistakes he has made specifically? I mean, we can all make a case for any system or combination of players if we want to play devil's advocate but you seem to do this all the time.
I agree with most of what you say about Dougie, very impressed with him, but let's not be blind to his occasional and inevitable mistakes. Seems daft when almost all of us think he's doing a good job.
People judge mistakes in the wrong way. Team selections can always be questioned. Nobody can say whether they are definitively right or wrong by the very nature. His worst team selection for me was the 4-4-2 he played against Sheffield Wednesday at home. No doubt many would have liked it.

I look more in general at how the club is managed, the direction of travel, the noises that come from within and the manager.

It's why I went to the fans forums to hear Coyle out. But there was just no substance.

So far Dougie seems very different.
you never used to have a problem doing that!! C'mon - you say generally that dougie will make mistakes like any manager - I'm just asking you if he has already made any - after all, as you say - he's not the Messiah! if he has made any - even small ones - what are they?? you've never been shy of highlighting specific managerial mistakes before!!

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Dougie

Post by Bruce Rioja » Tue May 21, 2013 9:41 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:A manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.
I think you'll find it means that they have a winning side/formula.
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Dougie

Post by thebish » Tue May 21, 2013 9:42 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:A manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.
now that's desperate even for you!! come on!!! :lol:

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Dougie

Post by jaffka » Tue May 21, 2013 9:50 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:A manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.
So when Ron Saunders won the league in 1981 and used 14 players during the course of a 42 game season, he should have chopped and changed more :conf:

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38896
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Dougie

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue May 21, 2013 9:51 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:A manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.
I think you'll find it means that they have a winning side/formula.
If you look at the sides that do well at the top of the game, most will not pick a constant 'settled side' week in week out. And they certainly have a winning formula.

Dougie has said coming in that he doesn't believe in the same 11 week in week out and that you have to pick the fittest team most capable of the job required each week, and that it is part of the modern game.

It might be different to what we are used to. But as a broad principle, he's doing what most of the top managers do. I think it's what he believes in.

What I think he will build around is a generally settled spine, as he had last season with Dawson, Spearing and Ngog in there during our best run.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38896
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Dougie

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue May 21, 2013 9:53 pm

jaffka wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:A manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.
So when Ron Saunders won the league in 1981 and used 14 players during the course of a 42 game season, he should have chopped and changed more :conf:
Just to state the obvious we are not in 1981 anymore and the game has changed significantly.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Dougie

Post by thebish » Tue May 21, 2013 9:56 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:A manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.
I think you'll find it means that they have a winning side/formula.
If you look at the sides that do well at the top of the game, most will not pick a constant 'settled side' week in week out. And they certainly have a winning formula.

Dougie has said coming in that he doesn't believe in the same 11 week in week out and that you have to pick the fittest team most capable of the job required each week, and that it is part of the modern game.

It might be different to what we are used to. But as a broad principle, he's doing what most of the top managers do. I think it's what he believes in.

What I think he will build around is a generally settled spine, as he had last season with Dawson, Spearing and Ngog in there during our best run.
but that's not what you said!! the fittest or best side would be the obvious! YOU said that a manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Dougie

Post by Bruce Rioja » Tue May 21, 2013 10:09 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
jaffka wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:A manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.
So when Ron Saunders won the league in 1981 and used 14 players during the course of a 42 game season, he should have chopped and changed more :conf:
Just to state the obvious we are not in 1981 anymore and the game has changed significantly.
You should understand that Jaffka's talking about a principle.
May the bridges I burn light your way

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Dougie

Post by jaffka » Tue May 21, 2013 10:16 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
jaffka wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:A manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.
So when Ron Saunders won the league in 1981 and used 14 players during the course of a 42 game season, he should have chopped and changed more :conf:
Just to state the obvious we are not in 1981 anymore and the game has changed significantly.
Has it? How much were goals worth then?

A cold hard fact to out the bollocks that you are spouting.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38896
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Dougie

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue May 21, 2013 10:34 pm

jaffka wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
jaffka wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:A manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.
So when Ron Saunders won the league in 1981 and used 14 players during the course of a 42 game season, he should have chopped and changed more :conf:
Just to state the obvious we are not in 1981 anymore and the game has changed significantly.
Has it? How much were goals worth then?

A cold hard fact to out the bollocks that you are spouting.
Oh dear. Why haven't Man Utd used just 14 players then? Why haven't Chelsea?

If the game hasn't changed then perhaps Bogdan should start picking up backpasses. After all that Villa side did it, so must be right.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: Dougie

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue May 21, 2013 10:38 pm

Mar wrote:[
In fact I would say Hall had the best of the opening half an hour from our forwards.
Are you serious?

He couldn't even stay on his feet for that first half hour and looked so nervous with his touch that he might shit himself.

Things improved a bit, but that first half hour was painful.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9410
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: Dougie

Post by Harry Genshaw » Tue May 21, 2013 10:53 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Things improved a bit, but that first half hour was painful.
:D What minute was he subbed? Must have only been around the 35th or so?
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Dougie

Post by jaffka » Tue May 21, 2013 10:56 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
jaffka wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
jaffka wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:A manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.
So when Ron Saunders won the league in 1981 and used 14 players during the course of a 42 game season, he should have chopped and changed more :conf:
Just to state the obvious we are not in 1981 anymore and the game has changed significantly.
Has it? How much were goals worth then?

A cold hard fact to out the bollocks that you are spouting.
Oh dear. Why haven't Man Utd used just 14 players then? Why haven't Chelsea?

If the game hasn't changed then perhaps Bogdan should start picking up backpasses. After all that Villa side did it, so must be right.
I know that you are mad but try and read back and see what you wrote.

You might just stop making a dick of yourself :wink:

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Dougie

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue May 21, 2013 11:05 pm

If Sports Science contributed to us being relegated next season, would it still be seen as a runaway success?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Dougie

Post by TKIZ! » Tue May 21, 2013 11:32 pm

So, what have I missed?
Pfffft.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Dougie

Post by thebish » Tue May 21, 2013 11:41 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
jaffka wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:A manager who constantly picks the obvious probably means they don't have much imagination.
So when Ron Saunders won the league in 1981 and used 14 players during the course of a 42 game season, he should have chopped and changed more :conf:
Just to state the obvious we are not in 1981 anymore and the game has changed significantly.
yes - but to repeat... you did NOT say it is a squad game today - you said that picking the obvious is a sign of a lack of imagination... presumably in some lame attempt to make out that when dougie makes an odd selection it is actually a sign of imagination and genius rather than a mistake...

truth is, sometimes it will be the right thing to do - sometimes it will be a mistake - as it was for coyle and megson and Lee and Allardyce...

you STILL haven't answered my simple question... has Dougie made any mistakes yet - and if so, what?

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: Dougie

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed May 22, 2013 12:47 am

Harry Genshaw wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Things improved a bit, but that first half hour was painful.
:D What minute was he subbed? Must have only been around the 35th or so?
Maybe it seemed longer!

First 20, let's say...
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], jmjhb, sonicthewhite and 13 guests