The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: The Great Art Debate
as evidenced in this famous example...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I'm not sure this adds very much... it's just interesting to note that Capri is traditionally thought of as being part of Odysseus's journey, especially by artists and writers in the 19th centrury.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I've read a bit more, I was putting Jason in to the same boat as Odysseus. So no debate then mummy...or rather I have no objection to the theory.

- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
Based on Bobo's map Ulysses needed a new navigator. He should have walked after his first stop.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Re: The Great Art Debate
keep up - he had a car!!Montreal Wanderer wrote:Based on Bobo's map Ulysses needed a new navigator. He should have walked after his first stop.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Beat me to it Bobo. Google Image search of Homeric maps, Oddessy, Illiad etc throws up loads.bobo the clown wrote:Here you go ...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I'm not sure this adds very much... it's just interesting to note that Capri is traditionally thought of as being part of Odysseus's journey, especially by artists and writers in the 19th centrury.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I've read a bit more, I was putting Jason in to the same boat as Odysseus. So no debate then mummy...or rather I have no objection to the theory.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
And it took him ten years. Ten years! Petrol stations were hard to find in those days.thebish wrote:keep up - he had a car!!Montreal Wanderer wrote:Based on Bobo's map Ulysses needed a new navigator. He should have walked after his first stop.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: The Great Art Debate
I wasn't sure whether to rant this in the angry thread, but its arts related so.....
Not Mrs Bob is off to London this summer holidays with her son for a few days. Looking online for theatre tickets yesterday she spotted that Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is on in the West End and tried to book tickets. No concessions, dress circle £148 each. Cheapest tickets around the 90 quid each mark
So, let me get this straight. In an age of austerity, we fund the luvvies to put on a show for the benefit of the people and they take the money, price a UK family out of the market and rip of the American and Jap tourists for almost 600 quid for a family of 4.
Bastards. Time to slash the arts budget.
Not Mrs Bob is off to London this summer holidays with her son for a few days. Looking online for theatre tickets yesterday she spotted that Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is on in the West End and tried to book tickets. No concessions, dress circle £148 each. Cheapest tickets around the 90 quid each mark

So, let me get this straight. In an age of austerity, we fund the luvvies to put on a show for the benefit of the people and they take the money, price a UK family out of the market and rip of the American and Jap tourists for almost 600 quid for a family of 4.
Bastards. Time to slash the arts budget.
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I think it should be in the politics thread personally...Bijou Bob wrote:I wasn't sure whether to rant this in the angry thread, but its arts related so.....
Not Mrs Bob is off to London this summer holidays with her son for a few days. Looking online for theatre tickets yesterday she spotted that Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is on in the West End and tried to book tickets. No concessions, dress circle £148 each. Cheapest tickets around the 90 quid each mark![]()
So, let me get this straight. In an age of austerity, we fund the luvvies to put on a show for the benefit of the people and they take the money, price a UK family out of the market and rip of the American and Jap tourists for almost 600 quid for a family of 4.
Bastards. Time to slash the arts budget.

That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: The Great Art Debate
You're all a lot more confident on where Odysseus went than any Classicist I've ever met! I seem to remember that folk seemed pretty certain that Scylla and Charibdis were supposedly off the coast of Italy, although I thought they 'were' closer to Sicily than Capri.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I'm not confident at all. I had him mixed up with Jason. All I know for certain is that Jason went to Colchis and Colchis is the coastline where Georgia is now.Prufrock wrote:You're all a lot more confident on where Odysseus went than any Classicist I've ever met! I seem to remember that folk seemed pretty certain that Scylla and Charibdis were supposedly off the coast of Italy, although I thought they 'were' closer to Sicily than Capri.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
I was told at school they were between Sicily and the mainland. Of course that was some sixty years ago so they may have moved.Prufrock wrote:You're all a lot more confident on where Odysseus went than any Classicist I've ever met! I seem to remember that folk seemed pretty certain that Scylla and Charibdis were supposedly off the coast of Italy, although I thought they 'were' closer to Sicily than Capri.
In reviewing my old notes I discover my meory failed me. It was Scylla and Charybdis that were in the straits of Messina, not the Sirens. Apparently]Homer says they lived between Scylla and Aeaea. However, Capri and many other places are in the mix.
Last edited by Montreal Wanderer on Thu May 30, 2013 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
West End theatres strictly a commercial op. no state funding for them.Bijou Bob wrote:I wasn't sure whether to rant this in the angry thread, but its arts related so.....
Not Mrs Bob is off to London this summer holidays with her son for a few days. Looking online for theatre tickets yesterday she spotted that Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is on in the West End and tried to book tickets. No concessions, dress circle £148 each. Cheapest tickets around the 90 quid each mark![]()
So, let me get this straight. In an age of austerity, we fund the luvvies to put on a show for the benefit of the people and they take the money, price a UK family out of the market and rip of the American and Jap tourists for almost 600 quid for a family of 4.
Bastards. Time to slash the arts budget.
Of course, if the show has originated in the subsidised sector, there has been funding support before the West End run, and the subsidised theatre is now coining it - so the original use of subsidy is being repaid.
But you are right - West End prices are abominable.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
https://www.artfinder.com/story/william ... 7-41363709" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Art of the Day - a bit of Hogarth and me in Art Detective mode.
Art of the Day - a bit of Hogarth and me in Art Detective mode.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: The Great Art Debate
What's with the "I'm not confident malarkey ???Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I'm not confident at all. I had him mixed up with Jason. All I know for certain is that Jason went to Colchis and Colchis is the coastline where Georgia is now.Prufrock wrote:You're all a lot more confident on where Odysseus went than any Classicist I've ever met! I seem to remember that folk seemed pretty certain that Scylla and Charibdis were supposedly off the coast of Italy, although I thought they 'were' closer to Sicily than Capri.
I've given you a map !!!
ffs.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
Dear Sherlock:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:https://www.artfinder.com/story/william ... 7-41363709
Art of the Day - a bit of Hogarth and me in Art Detective mode.
How can a cat be murderously transfixed by a bird? The phrase makes no sense to me. I am also not convinced that a cat and bird appearing in a Madonna picture necessarily influenced Hogarth.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
Okay, I've gone into detective mode. This family group is alleged to be the children of David Graham, Apothecary to George II. King George had two apothecaries named Graham - Thomas and his son Daniel. It was Daniel who commissioned the painting. regarding this I read:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:https://www.artfinder.com/story/william ... 7-41363709
Art of the Day - a bit of Hogarth and me in Art Detective mode.
So give whoever wrote the blurb a hard time and show how educated you are.Daniel Graham, was born about 1695. He succeeded his father as apothecary to King George II and afterwards to King George III. He was also apothecary at Chelsea College Hospital. Residing at 11 Pall Mall, Daniel was twice married. His first wife (who he may have married at Westminster in April 1729) may have been named Elizabeth Sibbald. She probably died soon after giving birth to a daughter,
1. Henrietta Catherine Graham, apparently born at Wotton in Surrey on 8th November 1733 and baptized at St.James's, Westminster on 30th November 1733. On 6th May 1752 she married Sydenham Malthus of The Rookery and Albury in Surrey. They were second cousins, being related through the Portman family.
Daniel Graham married 2ndly, about 1734, Mary Crisp. By her he had issue
1. Richard Robert Graham, of whom later.
2. Thomas Graham, born 18th August 1740. He died young, probably in 1742.
2. Anna Maria Graham, born 7th July 1738 and baptized at St.James's, Westminster on 1st August 1738. She was to marry (as his 2nd wife) THOMAS RYVES of Ranston Hall in Dorset at St.James's, Westminster, on 22nd September 1757.
In 1742 Daniel commissioned William Hogarth (1697-1764) to paint his children. When Hogarth began to sketch the children for the work, the youngest child Thomas was still alive. However by the time the painting was completed later that year, the youngster had died. This probably accounts for what are said to be some symbolic references to death appearing in the portrait, such as the winged cherub carrying a sickle above a clock in the background behind him.
The children are (from left to right) the infant Thomas sitting in a gold-leaf gilded go-cart; Henrietta in a blue dress holding two cherries; Anna Maria in a flower-print dress; and Richard who plays the sérinette (bird organ). Celebrated for its somewhat idealistic portrayal of childhood, it is also said to be Hogarth's most ambitious portrayal of children. Measuring over 160 x 180 cm, It has become one of the most famous paintings of its genre and is now in The National Gallery, Trafalgar Square, London. It also shows what a comfortable lifestyle this family enjoyed.
Daniel Graham died in 1788 and was buried in St.Mary's Church, Harrow on the Hill where there is a wall plaque to his memory. Below it can be seen the arms of the Graham family. His will was proved on 27th March 1778.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
The cat was rendered motionless by the bird and the possibility of its murder... yes it is clumsily worded.Montreal Wanderer wrote:Dear Sherlock:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:https://www.artfinder.com/story/william ... 7-41363709
Art of the Day - a bit of Hogarth and me in Art Detective mode.
How can a cat be murderously transfixed by a bird? The phrase makes no sense to me. I am also not convinced that a cat and bird appearing in a Madonna picture necessarily influenced Hogarth.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
Okay, I've gone into detective mode. This family group is alleged to be the children of David Graham, Apothecary to George II. King George had two apothecaries named Graham - Thomas and his son Daniel. It was Daniel who commissioned the painting. regarding this I read:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:https://www.artfinder.com/story/william ... 7-41363709
Art of the Day - a bit of Hogarth and me in Art Detective mode.
So give whoever wrote the blurb a hard time and show how educated you are.Daniel Graham, was born about 1695. He succeeded his father as apothecary to King George II and afterwards to King George III. He was also apothecary at Chelsea College Hospital. Residing at 11 Pall Mall, Daniel was twice married. His first wife (who he may have married at Westminster in April 1729) may have been named Elizabeth Sibbald. She probably died soon after giving birth to a daughter,
1. Henrietta Catherine Graham, apparently born at Wotton in Surrey on 8th November 1733 and baptized at St.James's, Westminster on 30th November 1733. On 6th May 1752 she married Sydenham Malthus of The Rookery and Albury in Surrey. They were second cousins, being related through the Portman family.
Daniel Graham married 2ndly, about 1734, Mary Crisp. By her he had issue
1. Richard Robert Graham, of whom later.
2. Thomas Graham, born 18th August 1740. He died young, probably in 1742.
2. Anna Maria Graham, born 7th July 1738 and baptized at St.James's, Westminster on 1st August 1738. She was to marry (as his 2nd wife) THOMAS RYVES of Ranston Hall in Dorset at St.James's, Westminster, on 22nd September 1757.
In 1742 Daniel commissioned William Hogarth (1697-1764) to paint his children. When Hogarth began to sketch the children for the work, the youngest child Thomas was still alive. However by the time the painting was completed later that year, the youngster had died. This probably accounts for what are said to be some symbolic references to death appearing in the portrait, such as the winged cherub carrying a sickle above a clock in the background behind him.
The children are (from left to right) the infant Thomas sitting in a gold-leaf gilded go-cart; Henrietta in a blue dress holding two cherries; Anna Maria in a flower-print dress; and Richard who plays the sérinette (bird organ). Celebrated for its somewhat idealistic portrayal of childhood, it is also said to be Hogarth's most ambitious portrayal of children. Measuring over 160 x 180 cm, It has become one of the most famous paintings of its genre and is now in The National Gallery, Trafalgar Square, London. It also shows what a comfortable lifestyle this family enjoyed.
Daniel Graham died in 1788 and was buried in St.Mary's Church, Harrow on the Hill where there is a wall plaque to his memory. Below it can be seen the arms of the Graham family. His will was proved on 27th March 1778.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I had the cat doing a bit of wishful thinking, given the sturdy cage. Motive, but no opportunity. 

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
And I'm not saying it 'necessarily' influenced Hogarth.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:The cat was rendered motionless by the bird and the possibility of its murder... yes it is clumsily worded.Montreal Wanderer wrote:Dear Sherlock:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:https://www.artfinder.com/story/william ... 7-41363709
Art of the Day - a bit of Hogarth and me in Art Detective mode.
How can a cat be murderously transfixed by a bird? The phrase makes no sense to me. I am also not convinced that a cat and bird appearing in a Madonna picture necessarily influenced Hogarth.
However, the unusual little detail of the cat watching the bird is one I don't think is that common. Hogarth was is known to have collected old master prints and to have used some elements from these prints in some of his paintings. The Barocci painting happens to be one of those paintings which became famous through the decent print version that was made of it.
All of those factors coming together do make me wonder.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
I won't bother, on this occasion - how on earth did you spot that?!Montreal Wanderer wrote:So give whoever wrote the blurb a hard time and show how educated you are.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: dave the minion and 11 guests