creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38865
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
I'd say it was quite accurate. Bumbles words 'i can't believe this is an international side batting'.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Insane in hyperbole shocker
Spot on.
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9722
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
It is a 20-20 match today. We have mainly steady batters trying to play quicker than they are usually comfortable with against a decent attack. Anyone would think we were playing the Red Lion 2nd 11 and 100 short with 2 balls to go the way you're throwing your arms in the airBWFC_Insane wrote:I'd say it was quite accurate. Bumbles words 'i can't believe this is an international side batting'.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Insane in hyperbole shocker
Spot on.

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
BWFCi has only two levels of emotion, rant or silence. No happy mediums allowed here. 

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38865
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
It was basically a run a ball. A run a ball. It was not needing any massive slog fest. That batting was abysmally poor and no real excuse for some of the shots we gave wickets away with. Yes India are a good side. Even so we threw that away ourselves. Not once but twice.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:It is a 20-20 match today. We have mainly steady batters trying to play quicker than they are usually comfortable with against a decent attack. Anyone would think we were playing the Red Lion 2nd 11 and 100 short with 2 balls to go the way you're throwing your arms in the airBWFC_Insane wrote:I'd say it was quite accurate. Bumbles words 'i can't believe this is an international side batting'.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Insane in hyperbole shocker
Spot on.
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9722
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Poor batting and not good enough on the day. Not the same as utterly embarrassing.BWFC_Insane wrote:It was basically a run a ball. A run a ball. It was not needing any massive slog fest. That batting was abysmally poor and no real excuse for some of the shots we gave wickets away with. Yes India are a good side. Even so we threw that away ourselves. Not once but twice.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:It is a 20-20 match today. We have mainly steady batters trying to play quicker than they are usually comfortable with against a decent attack. Anyone would think we were playing the Red Lion 2nd 11 and 100 short with 2 balls to go the way you're throwing your arms in the airBWFC_Insane wrote:I'd say it was quite accurate. Bumbles words 'i can't believe this is an international side batting'.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Insane in hyperbole shocker
Spot on.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Which we didn't achieve. We batted poorly, but once again you've gone characteristically way over the top with your 'embarrassing' assessment, Old Sport.BWFC_Insane wrote:
It was basically a run a ball.
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Was a fantastic game with brilliance and feck ups from both sides. The 20 overs they had gives much greater pressure than 50 - obviously. By a whisker the obviously best team in the competition shaded it against an England side that lost its bottle...
I enjoyed the game hugely - cricket is so often not really exciting and sometimes not even vaguely interesting and sometimes paralysing in its boredom.
This one wasn't... Excellent...
I'm puzzled by the mad man's passion and rush to judgement (more by the first than the second, tbh)...
I enjoyed the game hugely - cricket is so often not really exciting and sometimes not even vaguely interesting and sometimes paralysing in its boredom.
This one wasn't... Excellent...
I'm puzzled by the mad man's passion and rush to judgement (more by the first than the second, tbh)...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38865
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
I disagree that cricket isn't often exciting. In fact I'd say the 20-20 bash stuff is far less gripping than a proper test match between two even sides on a decent pitch.William the White wrote:Was a fantastic game with brilliance and feck ups from both sides. The 20 overs they had gives much greater pressure than 50 - obviously. By a whisker the obviously best team in the competition shaded it against an England side that lost its bottle...
I enjoyed the game hugely - cricket is so often not really exciting and sometimes not even vaguely interesting and sometimes paralysing in its boredom.
This one wasn't... Excellent...
I'm puzzled by the mad man's passion and rush to judgement (more by the first than the second, tbh)...
But each to his own I guess.
England as an ODI side, are a bit like the football side. Frustrating time and time again when it comes to the crunch, and often well before that point. Each time we are told what a good side they are only for them to find a new way to feck up.
Bit fed up with them hence the frustration. I still maintain they batted ridiculously poorly today and threw it away themselves.
On the plus side I prefer test cricket, the ashes are around the corner and unlike one dayers we have a very decent test side. Onwards and upwards.
Last edited by BWFC_Insane on Sun Jun 23, 2013 10:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
I agree wholeheartedly. Have no real investment in T20. have seen lots of test matches live. Many have been boring, most less than exciting but ok, and a few fantastic. Cricket is like that.BWFC_Insane wrote:I disagree that cricket isn't often exciting. In fact I'd say the 20-20 bash stuff is far less gripping than a proper test match between two even sides on a decent pitch.William the White wrote:Was a fantastic game with brilliance and feck ups from both sides. The 20 overs they had gives much greater pressure than 50 - obviously. By a whisker the obviously best team in the competition shaded it against an England side that lost its bottle...
I enjoyed the game hugely - cricket is so often not really exciting and sometimes not even vaguely interesting and sometimes paralysing in its boredom.
This one wasn't... Excellent...
I'm puzzled by the mad man's passion and rush to judgement (more by the first than the second, tbh)...
But each to his own I guess.
England as aa ODI side, are a bit like the football side. Frustrating time and time again when it comes to the crunch, and often well before that point. Each time we are told what a good side they are only for them to find a new way to feck up.
Bit fed up with then hence the frustration. I still maintain they batted ridiculously poorly today and threw it away themselves.
On the plus side I prefer test cricket, the ashes are around the corner and unlike one dayers we have a very decent test side. Onwards and upwards.
But I don't really have an emotional investment in English cricket - I'd rather we won, but I shrug off defeat very easily...
Unlike my response to Bolton Wanderers...
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Bunch of sheep-shearers have just smacked us all over The Oval in the T/20. Engand's target = 202.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
16 required off of the last over. Come on! 

May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
The regular knockabout with the Aussies starts today.
Thoughts? Predictions?
Thoughts? Predictions?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Cheers Hoss. Had a "senior", thinking it was a in Oz.CrazyHorse wrote:Think it's 11.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Don't worry tango, plenty of time for, er, time confusion as we play them again this winter!
Aussies put a 19-year-old spinner straight in. Word apparently is Finn gets a place.
Aussies put a 19-year-old spinner straight in. Word apparently is Finn gets a place.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Cookie crumbles! D:
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Peitersen gone for 14. 102-3. Not brilliant yet.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests