The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Me too. According to yer man, Beckford's being held up due to Leicester's Asian owners unfamiliarity with transfer protocol. I have absolutely no idea as to what's meant by that.BWFC_Insane wrote:Yeah I'm not panicking. I'd just like to see us sniff around a few decent centre backs.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Swapsies for Rhys Williams or whatever he was called?TKIZ! wrote:Boro want Wheater back, think we'd be mad to sell unless we could guarantee that Dawson is a viable option
http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/10530388._/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
I suspect Dougie will announce this on BBC, just so you and every other Club in the country know who they are! (I'm also fairly sure we have this conversation every year)BWFC_Insane wrote:Yeah I'm not panicking. I'd just like to see us sniff around a few decent centre backs.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Good call. I don't dislike Wheater, but he has "donkey" writ large and isn't quick on the turn.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Swapsies for Rhys Williams or whatever he was called?TKIZ! wrote:Boro want Wheater back, think we'd be mad to sell unless we could guarantee that Dawson is a viable option
http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/10530388._/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
No hank you they can keep him.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Swapsies for Rhys Williams or whatever he was called?TKIZ! wrote:Boro want Wheater back, think we'd be mad to sell unless we could guarantee that Dawson is a viable option
http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/10530388._/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Worthy4England wrote:bwfcdan94 wrote:6) MessiWorthy4England wrote:Given we can't get anything like a list out of LK, maybe Dan could give us a list and show where on the list he would be - so likeplymouth wanderer wrote:Dan, you seen him play?
1) Mooy
2) Blakeman
3) Mortiz
4) Afobe
5) Rhodes
There you go, I have seen him play twice btw and a few times on the tele.Bugger! Not as good as Mooy and Blakeman then.

The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
To be fair, even if Coyle had signed Tweedledum and Tweedledee, Nicko would say that Wigan have had a good transfer window
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
I also (perhaps unfairly) fear he has a few penalty giveaways in him..Worthy4England wrote:Good call. I don't dislike Wheater, but he has "donkey" writ large and isn't quick on the turn.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Swapsies for Rhys Williams or whatever he was called?TKIZ! wrote:Boro want Wheater back, think we'd be mad to sell unless we could guarantee that Dawson is a viable option
http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/10530388._/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
And Zat Knight?thebish wrote:I also (perhaps unfairly) fear he has a few penalty giveaways in him..Worthy4England wrote:I don't dislike Wheater, but he has "donkey" writ large and isn't quick on the turn.

May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
He's far from the worst centre half we've had in the last few years. I'd have knight and ream ahead of him in the rid stakesm
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
What I saw of him I thought Knight finished the season well. His confidence seemed to be much better and he looked a lot less indecisive.
I once even saw a turn of speed!!
I once even saw a turn of speed!!
Last edited by Enoch on Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
That's not saying a right lot though is it, Kid? He's feck* shite!Lord Kangana wrote:He's far from the worst centre half we've had in the last few years.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38820
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Dya mean Wheater Bruce? Cos I think that's who LK means....Bruce Rioja wrote:That's not saying a right lot though is it, Kid? He's feck shite!Lord Kangana wrote:He's far from the worst centre half we've had in the last few years.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Ahh, sorry. In which case I agree avec Le Chef.BWFC_Insane wrote:Dya mean Wheater Bruce? Cos I think that's who LK means....Bruce Rioja wrote:That's not saying a right lot though is it, Kid? He's feck shite!Lord Kangana wrote:He's far from the worst centre half we've had in the last few years.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Wheater is on about the same level as Knight. Significant limitations. Zat Knight is a long way from being our worst defender.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38820
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
I'd agree with this. I think Wheater is a bit tougher, Knight a bit quicker...marginally so.Worthy4England wrote:Wheater is on about the same level as Knight. Significant limitations. Zat Knight is a long way from being our worst defender.
In a squad with Ream you have to be exceptionally inept to win the worst defender award.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
That doesn't alter the fact that he's still worse than David Sutton though, does it?!Worthy4England wrote:Wheater is on about the same level as Knight. Significant limitations. Zat Knight is a long way from being our worst defender.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
A reasonable observation.Bruce Rioja wrote:That doesn't alter the fact that he's still worse than David Sutton though, does it?!Worthy4England wrote:Wheater is on about the same level as Knight. Significant limitations. Zat Knight is a long way from being our worst defender.
I still think Knight is our best CB in the current squad.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
I thought we were talking about Wheater! that's all!Bruce Rioja wrote:And Zat Knight?thebish wrote:I also (perhaps unfairly) fear he has a few penalty giveaways in him..Worthy4England wrote:I don't dislike Wheater, but he has "donkey" writ large and isn't quick on the turn.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
I think absence has made the Wheater seem a lot zazzier than he is! he'll do - but let's not imagine we couldn't do better...Worthy4England wrote:Wheater is on about the same level as Knight. Significant limitations. Zat Knight is a long way from being our worst defender.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], knobpolisher and 34 guests