The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Yer man has just spent the last seventeen (17) days saying Beckford was signing within the next 24 hours. Yesterday he finally made the correct call and we did indeed sign him within the next 24 hours.BWFC_Insane wrote:Once again Nixon knew before anyone else. Another lucky guess I suppose.
Another lucky guess I suppose.
Businesswoman of the year.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Anyway I've had enough of this charade. I'm off to add the word Nixon to the swear filter....
Businesswoman of the year.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Him and everybody else including our chairman. Complex deal took a long time to fully sort out.CrazyHorse wrote:Yer man has just spent the last seventeen (17) days saying Beckford was signing within the next 24 hours. Yesterday he finally made the correct call and we did indeed sign him within the next 24 hours.BWFC_Insane wrote:Once again Nixon knew before anyone else. Another lucky guess I suppose.
Another lucky guess I suppose.
But you don't need telling who first broke our interest in Beckford two months ago. Nope thought not.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
He will be on a decent wage at Bolton. Who is mad enough to take Andrews off our hands because he is unlikely to take a (big) drop in salary? I can't imagine they will be queuing round the block.TKIZ! wrote:If we can get rid of Andrews for Spearing I would be a happy chappy. Maybe Coyle will want him at the Pie Dome?bobo the clown wrote:I feel that the next "he's OK but we have better options" exit will be Andrews. Especially if there's anything in the Spearing thing.
It would be nice if we did get rid of him though.
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
I'm not 100%, but I am sure a club in Qatar was linked with him.malcd1 wrote:He will be on a decent wage at Bolton. Who is mad enough to take Andrews off our hands because he is unlikely to take a (big) drop in salary? I can't imagine they will be queuing round the block.TKIZ! wrote:If we can get rid of Andrews for Spearing I would be a happy chappy. Maybe Coyle will want him at the Pie Dome?bobo the clown wrote:I feel that the next "he's OK but we have better options" exit will be Andrews. Especially if there's anything in the Spearing thing.
It would be nice if we did get rid of him though.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Nixon obviously has good contacts at Bolton. I hate the way he'll say something like "touch and go. Can't comment on who it is" after saying we're going to sign someone. It's obvious he doesn't know who it is yet strings fans along to feed his ego. I am thankful he's a reliable source but he's an obnoxious, attention seeking knob.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Attention seeking knob is about right. But his business is selling stories to the Daily mirror and Sunday People. Presumably only chance he has of them paying him is if he hasn't put all the details out on twitter. So he uses that to generate interest and direct it towards the mirror website and paper without giving the exact details. Fairly odd bloke like that spends his day answering the same question a thousand times from football fans but whatever. He clearly knows but isn't going to give names out when he can make a living from it.SmokinFrazier wrote:Nixon obviously has good contacts at Bolton. I hate the way he'll say something like "touch and go. Can't comment on who it is" after saying we're going to sign someone. It's obvious he doesn't know who it is yet strings fans along to feed his ego. I am thankful he's a reliable source but he's an obnoxious, attention seeking knob.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
so when do we Rhodes sign then ? end of August mooted as when next Blackburn payment due to 'uddersfield that they supposedly can't afford
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Fire up the jet, I need a cabin team assembled and meet me at Mannie airport in an hour.ChrisC wrote:I'm not 100%, but I am sure a club in Qatar was linked with him.malcd1 wrote:He will be on a decent wage at Bolton. Who is mad enough to take Andrews off our hands because he is unlikely to take a (big) drop in salary? I can't imagine they will be queuing round the block.TKIZ! wrote:If we can get rid of Andrews for Spearing I would be a happy chappy. Maybe Coyle will want him at the Pie Dome?bobo the clown wrote:I feel that the next "he's OK but we have better options" exit will be Andrews. Especially if there's anything in the Spearing thing.
It would be nice if we did get rid of him though.

Pfffft.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
I quite like Craig Davies. Am I on my own?
He's certainly too good for wolves. Wonder if Ricketts has had a word?
He's certainly too good for wolves. Wonder if Ricketts has had a word?
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
No, I'd be quite sad to see him go.officer_dibble wrote:I quite like Craig Davies. Am I on my own?
He's certainly too good for wolves. Wonder if Ricketts has had a word?
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Same here. Think he's a decent impact subofficer_dibble wrote:I quite like Craig Davies. Am I on my own?
He's certainly too good for wolves. Wonder if Ricketts has had a word?
Pfffft.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Think he's ok but nowt special. From what I've seen I think he's a young SKD ish in his ability to physically unsettle opposition, but I fear he may have the same scoring return, particularly if he's only making sub appearancesofficer_dibble wrote:I quite like Craig Davies. Am I on my own?
He's certainly too good for wolves. Wonder if Ricketts has had a word?
still wonder how dougie is going to accomodate all the front players/ keep them happy, notwithstanding his rotation tendencies. I anticipate some shipping out either as loans (eaves, odelusi) or sales
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
TKIZ! wrote:Same here. Think he's a decent impact subofficer_dibble wrote:I quite like Craig Davies. Am I on my own?
He's certainly too good for wolves. Wonder if Ricketts has had a word?
Would rather keep him than Sordell or NGog.
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
You'd rather have Craig Davies than NGog? Really? NGog is a superior player by a long distance in my book.Turkish Trotter wrote:TKIZ! wrote:Same here. Think he's a decent impact subofficer_dibble wrote:I quite like Craig Davies. Am I on my own?
He's certainly too good for wolves. Wonder if Ricketts has had a word?
Would rather keep him than Sordell or NGog.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Nah. Ngog is our best forward for hold up play/ general skill & ability. Sordell has still the potential (and record) of a being a goalscorerTurkish Trotter wrote:TKIZ! wrote:Same here. Think he's a decent impact subofficer_dibble wrote:I quite like Craig Davies. Am I on my own?
He's certainly too good for wolves. Wonder if Ricketts has had a word?
Would rather keep him than Sordell or NGog.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
N'Gog has a good touch, is quick, makes it stick...sometimes. Despite all that, he's a f*cking coward. Pissing off injured if it's not going well, hiding when it's tough.
Does anyone see N'Gog with a winners medal around his neck? No?
Does anyone see N'Gog with a winners medal around his neck? No?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
I'm not sure about the coward thing, think that's a bit ott.Prufrock wrote:N'Gog has a good touch, is quick, makes it stick...sometimes. Despite all that, he's a f*cking coward. Pissing off injured if it's not going well, hiding when it's tough.
Does anyone see N'Gog with a winners medal around his neck? No?
Ngog with a goalscorer like Beckford? Could be tasty IMO.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
BWFC_Insane wrote:You'd rather have Craig Davies than NGog? Really? NGog is a superior player by a long distance in my book.Turkish Trotter wrote:TKIZ! wrote:Same here. Think he's a decent impact subofficer_dibble wrote:I quite like Craig Davies. Am I on my own?
He's certainly too good for wolves. Wonder if Ricketts has had a word?
Would rather keep him than Sordell or NGog.
If Ngog was up for it every match maybe, but he has a tendency to disappear. At least with Davies the effort is there. I know that I would rather have a player giving 100% every game than one who tries when he can be bothered.
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: truewhite15 and 29 guests