The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Locked
User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Jul 19, 2013 11:21 am

Beckford TGSG. Aye. :oyea:

Image
May the bridges I burn light your way

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Jul 19, 2013 11:23 am

Is that not technically a Pitch Shirt Grimace?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

NiceHotCuppaTea
Promising
Promising
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:20 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by NiceHotCuppaTea » Fri Jul 19, 2013 11:39 am

They've done another new video:

http://youtu.be/S1KzBPIPQQM

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by ChrisC » Fri Jul 19, 2013 11:42 am

Interview with Beckford.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... 1KzBPIPQQM" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jul 19, 2013 11:44 am

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
I reckon Eddie Davies is looking at this and saying 'we can't keep spending money without getting it back'. Which is fair enough apart from the fact that we need to go back up to have any chance of getting close to balancing the books to stop running at a loss.
Maybe eddie is struggling to remember those seasons in the premiership where we didn't run at a loss...
Yes but it depends if you spend or pocket the extra income.......

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by LeverEnd » Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:14 pm

r0ckpaperscissors wrote:Regarding Matt Mills to Leeds...
“I only want people at this football club who show the right attitude to being here – not someone who thinks we owe him a favour for what he has done in the past, or last year. Matt has shown the right attitude and is someone I’d like to work with.”
Another swipe by Dougie at Kevin Davies. Ouch! Time for the handbags soon.
Or Petrov? He's said nice things about SKD as well.
...

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by thebish » Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:29 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
I reckon Eddie Davies is looking at this and saying 'we can't keep spending money without getting it back'. Which is fair enough apart from the fact that we need to go back up to have any chance of getting close to balancing the books to stop running at a loss.
Maybe eddie is struggling to remember those seasons in the premiership where we didn't run at a loss...
Yes but it depends if you spend or pocket the extra income.......
And you, of course, would be calling for the latter? :-)

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:35 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
I reckon Eddie Davies is looking at this and saying 'we can't keep spending money without getting it back'. Which is fair enough apart from the fact that we need to go back up to have any chance of getting close to balancing the books to stop running at a loss.
Maybe eddie is struggling to remember those seasons in the premiership where we didn't run at a loss...
Yes but it depends if you spend or pocket the extra income.......
And you, of course, would be calling for the latter? :-)
No but I'm not Eddie Davies. I mean when you analyse it, the club has been badly run for the past few years. Whether that was Gartside's fault, Coyle's fault or whoever, we've spent money on players had a large wage bill halfway up the premiership wage bill table, still managed to come down. Then we've added to that with more big wages on the likes of Mills and not been able to go back up.

Eddie probably looks at that and thinks 'feck this I'm not letting them spend loads of money on anyone who rocks up in need of a new club anymore'. And fair play to him.

Interestingly the Rhodes deal has been described by AN as 'like the Anelka one'. Suggesting that like then Eddie is prepared to spend on one and one only deal. Not sure Rhodes is that safe a deal like, but we'll see. Still don't think it'll happen, Blackburn will not drop below the £12M they are currently asking for.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by thebish » Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:47 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:Blackburn will not drop below the £12M they are currently asking for.
Is that from one of your insider sources at blackburn?

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:48 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Blackburn will not drop below the £12M they are currently asking for.
Is that from one of your insider sources at blackburn?
I thought it was from £545, the solid wood ones like.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:52 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Blackburn will not drop below the £12M they are currently asking for.
Is that from one of your insider sources at blackburn?
:P No just a hunch. Even Venky's aren't going to anger their fans that much!

StaffsTrotter
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 839
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by StaffsTrotter » Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:56 pm

Depends against which business model you judge. don't think many clubs make money. Think our recent run in prem was exceptional and the books say we were punching well above our weight to survive and get the players in. Relatively small crowds, sponsorship, tv appearance money. Even the edge we got by the Reebok / associated uses has been copied and bettered.

I'm in the Eddie Davies can do no wrong corner. Local bloke. An actual fan. Put an unimaginable amount of money in. Must be bloody difficult watching someone spend your money on someone your told will be a worldbeater but then a short time later its obvious they are far from it

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jul 19, 2013 1:10 pm

StaffsTrotter wrote:Depends against which business model you judge. don't think many clubs make money. Think our recent run in prem was exceptional and the books say we were punching well above our weight to survive and get the players in. Relatively small crowds, sponsorship, tv appearance money. Even the edge we got by the Reebok / associated uses has been copied and bettered.

I'm in the Eddie Davies can do no wrong corner. Local bloke. An actual fan. Put an unimaginable amount of money in. Must be bloody difficult watching someone spend your money on someone your told will be a worldbeater but then a short time later its obvious they are far from it
I think everyone is, and should be. Seeing as nobody has come close to putting in what he has.

We have to be very thankful to him. And thankful that he is still backing the club now.

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by ChrisC » Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:17 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Blackburn will not drop below the £12M they are currently asking for.
Is that from one of your insider sources at blackburn?
If they don't shift Scott Dann (they want 6m!) The price for Rhodes will come down 100%. They have to balance the books and they are struggling to raise any cash for the next instalment they owe to Huddersfield. That magical date is August 30th and if they don't have the dosh then they have no choice but to drop the price and sell to pay Huddersfield.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:20 pm

ChrisC wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Blackburn will not drop below the £12M they are currently asking for.
Is that from one of your insider sources at blackburn?
If they don't shift Scott Dann (they want 6m!) The price for Rhodes will come down 100%. They have to balance the books and they are struggling to raise any cash for the next instalment they owe to Huddersfield. That magical date is August 30th and if they don't have the dosh then they have no choice but to drop the price and sell to pay Huddersfield.
None of this is known. Venkys are loaded, they could easily give Blackburn more money if they wanted. Remember the inner workings at Blackburn are now much less clear than they were.

It doesn't stack up that they can't possibly pay the 2.5M installment for Rhodes at the end of August but have agreed a 1.5M fee for Spearing.

If you're that hard up you're not buying premiership players. Despite what is said elsewhere.

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by ChrisC » Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:21 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
ChrisC wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Blackburn will not drop below the £12M they are currently asking for.
Is that from one of your insider sources at blackburn?
If they don't shift Scott Dann (they want 6m!) The price for Rhodes will come down 100%. They have to balance the books and they are struggling to raise any cash for the next instalment they owe to Huddersfield. That magical date is August 30th and if they don't have the dosh then they have no choice but to drop the price and sell to pay Huddersfield.
None of this is known. Venkys are loaded, they could easily give Blackburn more money if they wanted. Remember the inner workings at Blackburn are now much less clear than they were.

It doesn't stack up that they can't possibly pay the 2.5M installment for Rhodes at the end of August but have agreed a 1.5M fee for Spearing.

If you're that hard up you're not buying premiership players. Despite what is said elsewhere.

They are paying Liverpool in dribs and drabs and could only move for Spearing once Olsson was sold. They sound loaded to me!

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:27 pm

ChrisC wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
ChrisC wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Blackburn will not drop below the £12M they are currently asking for.
Is that from one of your insider sources at blackburn?
If they don't shift Scott Dann (they want 6m!) The price for Rhodes will come down 100%. They have to balance the books and they are struggling to raise any cash for the next instalment they owe to Huddersfield. That magical date is August 30th and if they don't have the dosh then they have no choice but to drop the price and sell to pay Huddersfield.
None of this is known. Venkys are loaded, they could easily give Blackburn more money if they wanted. Remember the inner workings at Blackburn are now much less clear than they were.

It doesn't stack up that they can't possibly pay the 2.5M installment for Rhodes at the end of August but have agreed a 1.5M fee for Spearing.

If you're that hard up you're not buying premiership players. Despite what is said elsewhere.

They are paying Liverpool in dribs and drabs and could only move for Spearing once Olsson was sold. They sound loaded to me!
So it is said. But they seem to be able to agree something for Spearing that we can't afford.

The source for this may be accurate with his Bolton news, but remember his once previously open line of communication with Rovers was cut last year. And he has more than a few axes to grind there.

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by ChrisC » Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:40 pm

800k or so for Murphy and 2.5m for Olsson I think they got. More than enough to get Spearing. He wont be going there though..

Back in a BWFC shirt next season! 8)

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:43 pm

If Venky's were so loaded, I'm sure they would have not waited so long to put their hands in their pockets.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:47 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:If Venky's were so loaded, I'm sure they would have not waited so long to put their hands in their pockets.
Not sure that follows. The Leicester owners are worth billions but Leicester are cutting costs this summer. Not everyone necessarily wants to pump money into the club they own.

I still don't think anyone really knows why Venkys bought Blackburn. Apart from Venkys themselves. And even they might be confused.....

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 34 guests