creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:57 am

BWFC_Insane wrote: It was the tail in anyhow.
The tail? He took Bell and he took Prior first ball.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:05 am

Ah, a seven wicket tail. Got it. :wink: When do you see it as the best two sides in the world going tot-to-toe, when we lose?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:05 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
We've beaten them comfortably enough 3-0. But apart from Lords it's been close. Weather saved us at Old Trafford and the other two tests could have gone either way.
without the weather, Old Trafford could have gone either way - why assume we would have lost that one?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38832
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:25 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
We've beaten them comfortably enough 3-0. But apart from Lords it's been close. Weather saved us at Old Trafford and the other two tests could have gone either way.
without the weather, Old Trafford could have gone either way - why assume we would have lost that one?
Ok, it could be 4-0 but for the weather.

If we win at the oval can we claim a 5-0 moral victory? :grin: Be quite fun.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:01 pm

bwfcdan94 wrote:Bell has won us this series no one else Broad may have had his moments but the difference between the two sides has been ding dong, simple as that.
It's a team game, Dan, and you win or lose as a team. And we won!!!!
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Dujon
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3340
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:37 am
Location: Australia, near Sydney, NSW
Contact:

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Dujon » Wed Aug 14, 2013 1:09 am

As a neutral when it comes to The Ashes I proffer my light hearted opinion on the series to date:

Australia:

Batting: Frangible. Inconsistent. Suffers from swingphobia combined with spin aversion and falloveritis.

Bowling: Inconsistent. 'Line' and 'length' are foreign words - as is 'Spin'. Just as good as batsmen as the batsmen.


England:

Batting: Not very good at bowling. Wobbly knees at times but able to draw quite well on the ingrained 'We Must Win' mantra.

Bowling: Still trying to sort out what is 'reverse' swing. Given that Australia doesn't know either it's not a disadvantage. Is he or isn't he a leggie or an offie? Who knows? The Australians certainly don't.


Umpires:

Only the cricket gods know - I certainly don't. Mind you, I wouldn't take on the job for quids.

:wink:

mrkint
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2681
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by mrkint » Wed Aug 21, 2013 12:46 pm

There's cricket on.

Broad's trolling of Australia continues to work as Lehmann comes out with a STINGING attack which in no way makes him seem like a complete berk.

Aus win toss, bat first. Warner goes early, Watson comes in and is looking good for his lbw in the eighties so far. Rogers nurdling.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38832
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Aug 21, 2013 12:48 pm

mrkint wrote:There's cricket on.

Broad's trolling of Australia continues to work as Lehmann comes out with a STINGING attack which in no way makes him seem like a complete berk.

Aus win toss, bat first. Warner goes early, Watson comes in and is looking good for his lbw in the eighties so far. Rogers nurdling.
It was worth a try to look at other bowlers. I agree with Jonathan Agnew though, that this will be the first and last time we see this particular bowling attack.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Wed Aug 21, 2013 4:38 pm

mrkint wrote:There's cricket on.

Broad's trolling of Australia continues to work as Lehmann comes out with a STINGING attack which in no way makes him seem like a complete berk.

Aus win toss, bat first. Warner goes early, Watson comes in and is looking good for his lbw in the eighties so far. Rogers nurdling.
Dropped by our captain on 104, alas.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:15 pm

i suspect with this bowling lineup, the Oz will bat the game out of sight... that's not to say we won't bat well too - but I doubt we'll beat them with a day to spare this time...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38832
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:33 pm

thebish wrote:i suspect with this bowling lineup, the Oz will bat the game out of sight... that's not to say we won't bat well too - but I doubt we'll beat them with a day to spare this time...
Can't entirely blame the bowling line up. We still have 3/4 of our first choice bowlers out there.

Watson had batted brilliantly. And Cook dropped him.

Flat pitch so England shouldn't have any problem batting on it?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Wed Aug 21, 2013 6:13 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:i suspect with this bowling lineup, the Oz will bat the game out of sight... that's not to say we won't bat well too - but I doubt we'll beat them with a day to spare this time...
Can't entirely blame the bowling line up. We still have 3/4 of our first choice bowlers out there.

Watson had batted brilliantly. And Cook dropped him.

Flat pitch so England shouldn't have any problem batting on it?
shouldn't... but - who knows!!!

as for bowling - on day one at the ovwel you wouldn't expect swann to be that much of a threat - so the batsmen know they only have to see off broad and anderson to have a bowling end nicely opened up...

you do have to try bowlers in test situations - and we have the series won - so I'm fine with it... it'd still be galling to let the Oz off on a high note at the end though...

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:04 pm

Just watched the highlights. Our lad had a difficult debut of it :(
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:05 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:Just watched the highlights. Our lad had a difficult debut of it :(
tomorrow's a new day - he'll bag 4!

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:10 pm

play to start at 2:30 - so far we have stopped them adding to their overnight score!

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:15 pm

thebish wrote:play to start at 2:30 - so far we have stopped them adding to their overnight score!
Aye, the rain made a grand job of that. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:53 pm

Jimmy's in there and gets Siddle. 318-5. :oyea:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:57 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:Jimmy's in there and gets Siddle. 318-5. :oyea:
go jimmster!!

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:57 pm

broad's having a decent spell too...

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:59 pm

thebish wrote:broad's having a decent spell too...
Aye, if we can get Haddin before he settles in a collapse might be on the cards.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest