The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Locked
User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:53 pm

Then again, Dougie might just ask "Is there anybody who doesn't want to play for this club?" as a wake-up call and, depending on the responses, nobody goes.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by bobo the clown » Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:55 pm

N'Gog, via his agent, has been touting himself almost a year now. He fancies returning to France and ... at the moment ... would fetch a fee.

The above description by Nixon fits Knight to a tee.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:00 pm

Lots of things to pull together here. Dougie's bristling press conference, gnixon's gnomic utterances, tweet from Neil Bonnar (not usually one for idle speculation), this apparently unconfirmed board meeting. Add it all together one way and you get (established) players being released from their contract in order to free up space on the wage bill: we could guess all night who that might be. Add it all up another way and it might be nothing of the sort.

Intrigued to see what tomorrow brings, and not just for the BN. (When do they update their website with that day's stories? 7am?)

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:02 pm

One thing: if Knight is released or given away, it's a hell of a turnaround from being made captain. Could be called a U-turn, although I dislike the way the term's used in politics when an unpopular or bonkers policy is reversed. Could also be called a very bold move.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:03 pm

A courageous decision?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
truewhite15
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3032
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by truewhite15 » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:07 pm

I'd be sad to see the back of Medo and Chungy in particular. I'd like to keep hold of Pratley, Wheater and Bogdan (this is, by the way, excluding summer signings).

Knight can feck off. Ngog, I'd be accepting cash for; he's about the only one left that we could get a couple of million for.

I'm astonished that centre back wasn't given a far higher priority in the off-season. We've still got time to fix it, but it will require investment. If we don't have money to invest, well...things are gonna get a whole lot worse before they get better.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:18 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:A courageous decision?
Courage tends to be qualified in retrospect. While those who died in the Charge of the Light Brigade might be recognised as courageous, the bloke who sent them into battle isn't. Perhaps had they pulled off a victory he might've been.

In the far less important world of football, bravery still depends on outcome. If in 1993 a reunified and reinvigorated Leeds had retained the league title without that obstreperous French interloper then Howard Wilkinson would be rather better remembered at Elland Road. If Freedman releases his captain and we shoot up the league, he'll be admired. If he releases his captain and we're still getting kicked from pillar to post it will be held up as another example of "You don't know what you're doing". Last time Bolton fans sung that at him we immediately went on an eight-match unbeaten run including six wins, so let's hope he still does know what he's doing.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Prufrock » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:20 pm

Knight Lee N'Gog Mills in ascending order. Maybe Cravies or Mears. Medo is going nowhere.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:21 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:One thing: if Knight is released or given away, it's a hell of a turnaround from being made captain. Could be called a U-turn, although I dislike the way the term's used in politics when an unpopular or bonkers policy is reversed. Could also be called a very bold move.
I think that Knight being offered the captaincy was exactly what any half decent psychologist would have advised. Offer him the role and give him the opportunity to rise to it. Knight hasn't - he's still an absolute liability. I'll be absolutely gutted if one of the players being shown the door tomorrow isn't Zat Knight.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:27 pm

I suspect all this is being overhyped. We can only show someone the door if we 'pay them off' or if they 'agree to leave for nothing' or if another club want to take them on and pay their wages.

I'd say there aren't any who will walk for nowt.

Paying them off is counter-productive.

Moving them to other clubs? Can anyone seeing clubs being willing to take the ones we want out on?

I'm sure DF is working to move some out to make way for the loan market. But I can't see it being as simple as saying 'Knight and Wheater are both utterly abysmal cowards lets move them on'.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:29 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:One thing: if Knight is released or given away, it's a hell of a turnaround from being made captain. Could be called a U-turn, although I dislike the way the term's used in politics when an unpopular or bonkers policy is reversed. Could also be called a very bold move.
I think that Knight being offered the captaincy was exactly what any half decent psychologist would have advised.
You say half decent, m'friend; I'd say half-insane. Or actually I'd say "Well thanks for your advice, doc: I'll take it on board and get back to you if I ever need you again."

Knowing when you've made a mistake, and acting 'pon it quickly, maketh the good manager. Trouble is, it's not like Knight's fallibility this term has come as a bone-shuddering shock to anyone at all. It was still a poor decision to make, and to make such a fuss about.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:33 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:A courageous decision?
Courage tends to be qualified in retrospect. While those who died in the Charge of the Light Brigade might be recognised as courageous, the bloke who sent them into battle isn't. Perhaps had they pulled off a victory he might've been.

In the far less important world of football, bravery still depends on outcome. If in 1993 a reunified and reinvigorated Leeds had retained the league title without that obstreperous French interloper then Howard Wilkinson would be rather better remembered at Elland Road. If Freedman releases his captain and we shoot up the league, he'll be admired. If he releases his captain and we're still getting kicked from pillar to post it will be held up as another example of "You don't know what you're doing". Last time Bolton fans sung that at him we immediately went on an eight-match unbeaten run including six wins, so let's hope he still does know what he's doing.
It was a quote from yes Minister!
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

jimbo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 am

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by jimbo » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:36 pm

If these three do leave tomorrow we'll need a pretty quick re-appraisal of who to boo on Saturday.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:37 pm

If the team carries on regardless, I think that'll be pretty self evident.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:37 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote: I'm sure DF is working to move some out to make way for the loan market. But I can't see it being as simple as saying 'Knight and Wheater are both utterly abysmal cowards lets move them on'.
They're neither abysmal or cowards, just not quite good or skilled enough. Knight tries to defend bravely enough but hasn't the nous to play out of trouble so he leathers it anywhere. He loses too many balls to attackers and is no natural athlete. Wheater has bags of guts and puts his head in and might shape better with a more talented partner. Together, they just don't cut it.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by bobo the clown » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:39 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:One thing: if Knight is released or given away, it's a hell of a turnaround from being made captain. Could be called a U-turn, although I dislike the way the term's used in politics when an unpopular or bonkers policy is reversed. Could also be called a very bold move.
I think that Knight being offered the captaincy was exactly what any half decent psychologist would have advised.
You say half decent, m'friend; I'd say half-insane. Or actually I'd say "Well thanks for your advice, doc: I'll take it on board and get back to you if I ever need you again."

Knowing when you've made a mistake, and acting 'pon it quickly, maketh the good manager. Trouble is, it's not like Knight's fallibility this term has come as a bone-shuddering shock to anyone at all. It was still a poor decision to make, and to make such a fuss about.
I mentioned yesterday the time when DF announced it during one of the fan/manager love ins and when he announced it there was a mixture of laughter, groans and gasps.

That very moment he must have known the importance of being right. But Dougie has shown himself to be a stubborn guy and, whilst less divisive than Megson, still has a tendency to the "the fans don't really understand football the way we pro's do" style.

We are, of course, all assuming that
a). something happens tomorrow and
b). it's Knight that this something happens to.

My money is on f'call happening. In full view at any rate.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

jimbo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 am

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by jimbo » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:40 pm

And to think both of our esteemed central defensive pair have been around England squads before with one even getting a couple of games.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:42 pm

Thats my worry, that its the usual shit to drum up sales/hits/interest in "super-duper-window-slamming-shut-ooh-its-still-ajar-isn't-it-anything-could-happen-deadline-apocalypse-day". I expect minute-by-minute updates from BWFCi.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:46 pm

Ah. OK. Still, I stand by my response.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:46 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:You say half decent, m'friend; I'd say half-insane.
Nah, you should always give people the opportunity to rise beyond their level of competence. Now, you and I know that Knight's already above his, but we really needed to give him the old "Come on, you've played twice for England. The club needs you to take charge". Whereas my pep talk to him would have been "Zat, you were signed by Fulham from Rushall Olympic for 30 trackies. They want 15 back you utterly useless sack of shit". ;)
May the bridges I burn light your way

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests