The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Locked
User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by plymouth wanderer » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:07 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:Nixon has spoken.
@reluctantnicko

For the Bolton punters. Sadly the ones you want rid of are at least second choice on other club hit lists ... Ngog, Knight, Mills. #NotGood
I knew Knight was "on the list".

If that's true, then surely even if he doesn't go he has to be stripped of the captaincy and plunged into oblivion for all eternity?
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:09 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Nixon has spoken.
@reluctantnicko

For the Bolton punters. Sadly the ones you want rid of are at least second choice on other club hit lists ... Ngog, Knight, Mills. #NotGood
I knew Knight was "on the list".

If that's true then surely even if he doesn't go he has to be stripped of the captaincy and plunged into oblivion for all eternity?
:lol: I don't think Eddie would take too kindly to paying £25,000 a week or whatever to a player who is completely shunned and banished.

That is the fine line. You can't just alienate individuals when you've got no chance of replacing them. It is what Freedman was saying in that interview about wanting to move some on but it being difficult with their contract situation so having to "try and work" with them.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Bruce Rioja » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:11 pm

If we get shot of N'Gog then that means I won't keep getting him and Pratley mixed up. :)
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:13 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:If we get shot of N'Gog then that means I won't keep getting him and Pratley mixed up. :)
Doesn't sound like we can get shot of anyone.

Perhaps one of them needs to dye their hair or sommat!

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:If we get shot of N'Gog then that means I won't keep getting him and Pratley mixed up. :)
One's French and one's a cockney :mrgreen:
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

89bwfc89
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1176
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 2:45 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by 89bwfc89 » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:19 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:If we get shot of N'Gog then that means I won't keep getting him and Pratley mixed up. :)
:lol:

Me too!

My dad gets Pratters & Mr 89 mixed up. Mr 89 looks more like Tierney! :lol: :crazy:

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by plymouth wanderer » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:21 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
plymouth wanderer wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Nixon has spoken.
@reluctantnicko

For the Bolton punters. Sadly the ones you want rid of are at least second choice on other club hit lists ... Ngog, Knight, Mills. #NotGood
I knew Knight was "on the list".

If that's true then surely even if he doesn't go he has to be stripped of the captaincy and plunged into oblivion for all eternity?
:lol: I don't think Eddie would take too kindly to paying £25,000 a week or whatever to a player who is completely shunned and banished.

That is the fine line. You can't just alienate individuals when you've got no chance of replacing them. It is what Freedman was saying in that interview about wanting to move some on but it being difficult with their contract situation so having to "try and work" with them.

:lol: so Knight has to play cus he's on a high wage

Fvck off

Out of the current centre halves and I'm going to include Baps in that knight should be last choice!
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:23 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:
:lol: so Knight has to play cus he's on a high wage

Fvck off

Out of the current centre halves and I'm going to include Baps in that knight should be last choice!
Didn't say that but you can't burn bridges. I think there is a level of blame being attached to Knight that is going overboard. Don't get me wrong he's not good. But I just don't think we're fixed by dropping him like some might suggest. Obviously getting shut and having his wages to play with would be ideal.

Personally I'd play him ahead of Wheater at the moment at least. And Baptiste will have to play right back for me.

IggyTheDawgster
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 821
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:11 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by IggyTheDawgster » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:25 pm

If Knight starts the next game......I'll lose a hell of a lot of respect not just for Dougie, But he has Lennie sat beside him and Curtis Fleming.

That's 3 pairs of eyes. They must see what we see.
It ain't easy, Sleazy even, Deceiving those we, Believe in.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:27 pm

IggyTheDawgster wrote:If Knight starts the next game......I'll lose a hell of a lot of respect not just for Dougie, But he has Lennie sat beside him and Curtis Fleming.

That's 3 pairs of eyes. They must see what we see.
Perhaps they think that we don't have better options?

I would like to try other things out definitely but should Wheater be playing either?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Prufrock » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:30 pm

It's getting to the point where I'd be glad to see Knight and N'Gog go without being replaced just so he can't pick them anymore.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

IggyTheDawgster
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 821
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:11 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by IggyTheDawgster » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:31 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
IggyTheDawgster wrote:If Knight starts the next game......I'll lose a hell of a lot of respect not just for Dougie, But he has Lennie sat beside him and Curtis Fleming.

That's 3 pairs of eyes. They must see what we see.
Perhaps they think that we don't have better options?

I would like to try other things out definitely but should Wheater be playing either?
Anything is worth a try. It's just not working, We can all see that by now.

Far too many mistakes, and you're right, It's not just knight, but he has been the one guilty of the most individual errors that have lead to us directly conceding a goal. It must start with him out for someone different.
It ain't easy, Sleazy even, Deceiving those we, Believe in.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:35 pm

IggyTheDawgster wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
IggyTheDawgster wrote:If Knight starts the next game......I'll lose a hell of a lot of respect not just for Dougie, But he has Lennie sat beside him and Curtis Fleming.

That's 3 pairs of eyes. They must see what we see.
Perhaps they think that we don't have better options?

I would like to try other things out definitely but should Wheater be playing either?
Anything is worth a try. It's just not working, We can all see that by now.

Far too many mistakes, and you're right, It's not just knight, but he has been the one guilty of the most individual errors that have lead to us directly conceding a goal. It must start with him out for someone different.
Do you think? I think it has been pretty even.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:36 pm

Swansea sign loan striker from Getafe. So that's what Laudrup meant.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:37 pm

Prufrock wrote:It's getting to the point where I'd be glad to see Knight and N'Gog go without being replaced just so he can't pick them anymore.
Scathing, but there's a point there.

I think Ngog might - might - play well in a well-organised team. But I've been saying that for a year or two and it's not happened.

newcarsmell
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:07 am
Location: Makes Megson Look Like Mourinho.. Owen Owen Coyle

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by newcarsmell » Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:38 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:whoever it turns out to be - purchase or loanee - we should do a Real Madrid and unveil him just the same way as Bale is being unveiled!
How many do you reckon would turn up for Danny Butterfield's unveiling?
i think he's already taken now, isn't he? otherwise - of course - there would be hoards! and he'd even try to address us in our native language!
SSN reporting Butterfield has left Carlise :shock:

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by thebish » Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:11 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:BWFCi.
not so - BWFCi said dougie loved Ngog and would build his team around his awesome ball-hold-upability this season - then form an ace partnership with beckford...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:15 pm

thebish wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:BWFCi.
not so - BWFCi said dougie loved Ngog and would build his team around his awesome ball-hold-upability this season - then form an ace partnership with beckford...
And? He's clearly trying to raise funds and selling NGog was one of the few ways we had a chance of that, but seemingly now even that isn't possible.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by thebish » Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:26 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:BWFCi.
not so - BWFCi said dougie loved Ngog and would build his team around his awesome ball-hold-upability this season - then form an ace partnership with beckford...
And? He's clearly trying to raise funds and selling NGog was one of the few ways we had a chance of that, but seemingly now even that isn't possible.
i was defending you!! LK said it was you who said dougie wanted rid of Ngog...

IggyTheDawgster
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 821
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:11 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by IggyTheDawgster » Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:28 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:BWFCi.
not so - BWFCi said dougie loved Ngog and would build his team around his awesome ball-hold-upability this season - then form an ace partnership with beckford...
And? He's clearly trying to raise funds and selling NGog was one of the few ways we had a chance of that, but seemingly now even that isn't possible.
i was defending you!! LK said it was you who said dougie wanted rid of Ngog...
There we are, Defender sorted. Knight out-Bish in.
It ain't easy, Sleazy even, Deceiving those we, Believe in.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 32 guests