Bruce or Sam.

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue Sep 10, 2013 12:45 pm

It's interesting how many use the word 'cynical' about Allardyce, with pejorative undertones.

That's precisely what I loved him for.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by BL3 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:36 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:I think there are two impressive things about Allardyce not just that he wanted to bring those players in, but that he found a way to make it financially possible, bring them in on frees in the latter part of their careers.
I think Djorkaeff's signing was initially a last minute loan deal. It was only possible because he wasn't in Kaiserslautern's team at the time and he wanted to be part of the French squad in that summer's World Cup. Allardyce's talent was in spotting a potential opportunity. Once we'd signed Djorkaeff permanently, signing the others became a bit easier, especially when we were offering massive wages.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31729
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:50 pm

Getting ageing freebies in on high-wage, low-return deals: Allardyce's idea or Gartside's? Certainly Eddie's money.

Again, not to take away from Allardyce, but it's not like we've only ever had two good men associated with the club since 1980.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31729
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:51 pm

BL3 wrote:Colin Todd was on a radio show a few years ago and he told a story about how he and Rioch would often sit down at the end of the day and chat about which players they'd sign if they ever had the funds to do so at Bolton. Rioch's number one choice was an Ajax player who had just started to make his mark. Dennis Bergkamp. I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest that if Rioch had stayed he would also have been trying to sign players like Djorkaeff and Okocha.
It's a lovely story, thanks for that. I could get on with you as long as we don't mention Freedman... :wink:

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38900
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:54 pm

BL3 wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:I think there are two impressive things about Allardyce not just that he wanted to bring those players in, but that he found a way to make it financially possible, bring them in on frees in the latter part of their careers.
I think Djorkaeff's signing was initially a last minute loan deal. It was only possible because he wasn't in Kaiserslautern's team at the time and he wanted to be part of the French squad in that summer's World Cup. Allardyce's talent was in spotting a potential opportunity. Once we'd signed Djorkaeff permanently, signing the others became a bit easier, especially when we were offering massive wages.
He was released from his contract at Kaiserslautern so did sign on a free (till the end of the season).

This was in February (no transfer windows then!).

But important to remember that whilst Youri was the first "HUGE" name. Earlier that season we'd signed NGotty on loan from Marseille! Which was a pretty big deal in itself.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:36 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
LeverEnd wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
BL3 wrote:Colin Todd was on a radio show a few years ago and he told a story about how he and Rioch would often sit down at the end of the day and chat about which players they'd sign if they ever had the funds to do so at Bolton. Rioch's number one choice was an Ajax player who had just started to make his mark. Dennis Bergkamp. I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest that if Rioch had stayed he would also have been trying to sign players like Djorkaeff and Okocha.
I agree Rioch was fiercely ambitious like Allardyce.

And the Reebok was a legacy that allowed Allardyce to deliver those players.

I think there are two impressive things about Allardyce not just that he wanted to bring those players in, but that he found a way to make it financially possible, bring them in on frees in the latter part of their careers. But that in itself only is part of the story. Allardyce managed those players brilliantly and made it work. He blended home-grown players like Hunt and Nolan, with the big superstars and found a formula to make it work.
When did Eddie Davies get involved? His cash was obviously a big help to Sam.
2003
An old source of mine, who's family used to have a great deal of involvement in, and therefore info on the workings of the club said at the time that one of Gartside's primary missions was to woo a benefactor. I believe that Eddie Davies was in and around the club well before that date, though admittedly I don't know when his financial involvement started. Was it he who helped to bring in Djorkaeff, or Djorkaeff who persuaded Eddie Davies?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

bw@bw
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:43 pm
Location: midlands

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by bw@bw » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:44 pm

BL3 wrote:
bw@bw wrote:Armfield is not in this race - he was was only any good because of his No 2 - Ian Greaves
Armfield took Leeds to a European Cup final when he left us...
Jimmy Armfield was a great full back, an England captain and in later years a good 5 Live summariser and FA VIP.
But he was never more than a very ordinary manager who was in the right place at the right time.
The great players - and there were several in that despicable but genuinely great Leeds team- ran the show and treated Jimmy Armfield with contempt. Billy Bremner summed him up - "The managers indecision is final"

Ian Greaves was a proven manager when he came to us. He had taken Huddersfield up to the First Division, with a young lad called Frank Worthington leading the line, and had developed a style of play based on keeping the ball that was ahead of its time (for this country at any rate).

Jimmy Armfield went to Leeds at the right time- for us and for him--and that let Ian Greaves develop the team in his own image- and create what for me was the most enjoyable period as a Wanderer- although it did take several attempts to get into the First Division.

I suppose that if I had been a teenager in the 1990's, I might be voting for Bruce- but by then the romance had gone out of it.

In the end, Sam's achievements stand head and shoulders above anything else in my watching lifetime (first match 1962 so too young for the 1958 cup).
Watching Okocha and Le God swap 60 yard passes was beyond anything I could have hoped for.

But it was Ian Greaves who made it all possible. After all, he gave Sam his start in the game, and passed on his coaching and management nous in his later years
What goes around may still come around

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34783
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:11 pm

bw@bw wrote:
BL3 wrote:
bw@bw wrote:Armfield is not in this race - he was was only any good because of his No 2 - Ian Greaves
Armfield took Leeds to a European Cup final when he left us...
Jimmy Armfield was a great full back, an England captain and in later years a good 5 Live summariser and FA VIP.
But he was never more than a very ordinary manager who was in the right place at the right time.
The great players - and there were several in that despicable but genuinely great Leeds team- ran the show and treated Jimmy Armfield with contempt. Billy Bremner summed him up - "The managers indecision is final"

Ian Greaves was a proven manager when he came to us. He had taken Huddersfield up to the First Division, with a young lad called Frank Worthington leading the line, and had developed a style of play based on keeping the ball that was ahead of its time (for this country at any rate).

Jimmy Armfield went to Leeds at the right time- for us and for him--and that let Ian Greaves develop the team in his own image- and create what for me was the most enjoyable period as a Wanderer- although it did take several attempts to get into the First Division.

I suppose that if I had been a teenager in the 1990's, I might be voting for Bruce- but by then the romance had gone out of it.

In the end, Sam's achievements stand head and shoulders above anything else in my watching lifetime (first match 1962 so too young for the 1958 cup).
Watching Okocha and Le God swap 60 yard passes was beyond anything I could have hoped for.

But it was Ian Greaves who made it all possible. After all, he gave Sam his start in the game, and passed on his coaching and management nous in his later years
Can't see much wrong in this assessment. :-)

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by BL3 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:25 am

bw@bw wrote:But he was never more than a very ordinary manager who was in the right place at the right time. The great players - and there were several in that despicable but genuinely great Leeds team- ran the show and treated Jimmy Armfield with contempt. Billy Bremner summed him up - "The managers indecision is final"
They treated everyone with contempt, including Brian Clough.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31729
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:08 pm

BL3 wrote:
bw@bw wrote:But he was never more than a very ordinary manager who was in the right place at the right time. The great players - and there were several in that despicable but genuinely great Leeds team- ran the show and treated Jimmy Armfield with contempt. Billy Bremner summed him up - "The managers indecision is final"
They treated everyone with contempt, including Brian Clough.
Indeed. It's before my era, but again I don't see the need for people to denigrate decent managers. As a successful Bolton manager, a good journalist and an exceedingly pleasant interviewee, Gentleman Jim's something of a hero to me - a picture of him typing away on the Blackpool Gazette adorns our office wall, just above Orwell's Rules of Writing.

Image

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by bobo the clown » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:09 pm

Jimmy, or Mr. Armfield, was a true gentleman ... a seriously nice man and a good coach though Greaves did a great deal of that too. I wouldn't underestimate what he did for steadying a ship which had more managers back then than Blackburn have recently.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by bwfcdan94 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:45 pm

BSA is on a league of their own this evening.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

bw@bw
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:43 pm
Location: midlands

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by bw@bw » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:03 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
BL3 wrote:
bw@bw wrote:But he was never more than a very ordinary manager who was in the right place at the right time. The great players - and there were several in that despicable but genuinely great Leeds team- ran the show and treated Jimmy Armfield with contempt. Billy Bremner summed him up - "The managers indecision is final"
They treated everyone with contempt, including Brian Clough.
Indeed. It's before my era, but again I don't see the need for people to denigrate decent managers. As a successful Bolton manager, a good journalist and an exceedingly pleasant interviewee, Gentleman Jim's something of a hero to me - a picture of him typing away on the Blackpool Gazette adorns our office wall, just above Orwell's Rules of Writing.

Image
Jimmy Armfield - is all of the wonderful things you say. and a worthy hero. This discussion is not in any way to denigrate him.

If those Leeds bastards could chew up Brian Clough, then a bloke as nice as Jimmy had no chance
But this discussion came from an earlier poster saying that Ian Greaves was only successful because he picked up on JA legacy.

Sorry, but that part is just not how it was.

Greaves was the master coach and tactician - also incidentally a very nice man - and in the pantheon of Wanderers managers - Sam, Greaves, Rioch all come well ahead of Jimmy Armfield
What goes around may still come around

FaninOz
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:24 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by FaninOz » Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:39 am

Bruce for me, I was so sad when he left us. Best football that we had played for years and as people have said the foundation and belief on which Sam was able to build.
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED

danardif1
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 579
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:09 am
Location: Reading, Berks

Re: Bruce or Sam.

Post by danardif1 » Wed Sep 18, 2013 7:00 am

As someone who has been a Wanderer mostly through Big Sam's era I'd have to with him. He took us to places we'd never ever dream of, gave us Super Kev, Nolan, Jay Jay, Youri, Dioufy, Campo, Stelios and Fernando sodding Hierro(!)... got us into Europe on a comparative shoestring, innovated off the field with Prozone and other space age tech that got the best out of what we had. Even after he left, by proxy (and I hope Megson knows it) he gave us Munich. The club as it is now is a shadow of what it was under Big Sam, and it saddens me to think that when it seemed so easy to just carry it through...

BUT

Looking back on clips and snippets now, the Rioch era seemed like a bloody good time. Attractive football from a good stock of old-school British players, club heroes like Super John, finding lesser-known European talents like Paatelainen and blooding new talents like McAteer, Thompson and Stubbs. That rise up the divisions was fast and must've been a hell of a ride. Perhaps we're due something like that if we continue to struggle to get over the Big Sam era...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Harry Genshaw, RusholmeRuffian and 28 guests