Liam Feeney

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by LeverEnd » Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:40 pm

jaffka wrote:
hi there, i'm chris wrote:Did you read my post? :lol: it pretty much explains it all in there. Not much else I can agree or disagree on.
Of course I read it which is why I said that you are mad. :lol:
So far beyond optimism to have bypassed delusion and headed straight into the realms of hallucination. But I appreciate it, keep it up.

:oyea:
...

AbrahM
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:22 am

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by AbrahM » Sun Oct 06, 2013 11:45 pm

Barring the first half of last season this is the worst squad we've had for years

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by Prufrock » Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:06 am

*Pin out*

This squad is utterly wank compared to the comfortably mid-table Premier League squad Owen Coyle managed to relegate.

*Aaaaaand throw*
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by LeverEnd » Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:15 am

Prufrock wrote:*Pin out*

This squad is utterly wank compared to the comfortably mid-table Premier League squad Owen Coyle managed to relegate.

*Aaaaaand throw*
Dan saw the grenade coming and in an act of ultimate heroic self-sacrifice leapt on it and stifled the blast under his prostrate form. Hence no replies.
...

hi there, i'm chris
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 754
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:05 am

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by hi there, i'm chris » Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:35 am

Prufrock wrote:*Pin out*

This squad is utterly wank compared to the comfortably mid-table Premier League squad Owen Coyle managed to relegate.

*Aaaaaand throw*
Is it really that different though? We still have arguably the best players from that squad (Holden, Mark Davies, Lee) and going off the team that played against Stoke, Kevin Davies and Martin Petrov are two that most were happy to see the back of, which leaves Klasnic and Reo Coker. I'd rather have Medo and Spearing than Reo Coker.

My point was that with an all firing midfield (which is a massive ask at this stage), a decent central defender and a goal scorer we wouldn't be far off having a good side. I'd probably be inclined to agree with the poster who said we'd need a full new back line, but we all saw how Craig Dawson managed to turn that shower of shite from last season into a decent, solid back line.
http://www.twitter.com/chrisbradish" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Enoch
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:08 pm
Location: The Garden of England.

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by Enoch » Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:44 am

hi there, i'm chris wrote:My point was that with an all firing midfield (which is a massive ask at this stage), a decent central defender and a goal scorer we wouldn't be far off having a good side.
I think you might be onto something!!

SmokinFrazier
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by SmokinFrazier » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:13 am

I don't think we have a bad squad at all. Even with the group we have, I'd be pretty confident that a manager like Allardyce would be able to keep us away from relegation if we were in the Premier League. The issue we have right now isn't the players' true level of ability, it's that they are underperforming. Bogdan, Wheater, Ream, Tierney, Medo, Spearing, Eagles, Davies, Chungy and a right back and striker isn't a bad team at all, and certainly not one which would obviously go down. I think we'd be better than at least 3 other teams in the Premier League, assuming we had a good manager in charge.

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by BL3 » Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:44 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
BL3 wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Danns was doing the running that our so called 'talented players' don't fancy doing. So he worked back when needed and supported Beckford when needed. Which involved a lot of running and effort. Was it an eye catching display? No, but it was a very much needed display in a role that we've found other players struggle with.
And he got a goal. Right now we are rightly prioritising attitude over ability. And Danns is showing exactly the right attitude.
If we're now 'prioritising attitude over ability' it's because we're struggling at the wrong end of the table. These loan signings aren't a sign of Dougie's managerial genius, they're a last ditch measure to address something that he could and should have addressed much earlier. We might not be in this position if he'd got the balance of the team right before the season started.
Indeed. I didn't suggest otherwise. I think certain players have let themselves and the club down. That isn't to say we shouldn't have had these sorts in at the start. Whether that was Dougies fault of an inability to bring them in then I don't know.
But previously you said that 'Dougie has known the issues all along'...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:53 am

BL3 wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
BL3 wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Danns was doing the running that our so called 'talented players' don't fancy doing. So he worked back when needed and supported Beckford when needed. Which involved a lot of running and effort. Was it an eye catching display? No, but it was a very much needed display in a role that we've found other players struggle with.
And he got a goal. Right now we are rightly prioritising attitude over ability. And Danns is showing exactly the right attitude.
If we're now 'prioritising attitude over ability' it's because we're struggling at the wrong end of the table. These loan signings aren't a sign of Dougie's managerial genius, they're a last ditch measure to address something that he could and should have addressed much earlier. We might not be in this position if he'd got the balance of the team right before the season started.
Indeed. I didn't suggest otherwise. I think certain players have let themselves and the club down. That isn't to say we shouldn't have had these sorts in at the start. Whether that was Dougies fault of an inability to bring them in then I don't know.
But previously you said that 'Dougie has known the issues all along'...
I think he did. You think he didn't.

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by BL3 » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:11 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
BL3 wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
BL3 wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Danns was doing the running that our so called 'talented players' don't fancy doing. So he worked back when needed and supported Beckford when needed. Which involved a lot of running and effort. Was it an eye catching display? No, but it was a very much needed display in a role that we've found other players struggle with.
And he got a goal. Right now we are rightly prioritising attitude over ability. And Danns is showing exactly the right attitude.
If we're now 'prioritising attitude over ability' it's because we're struggling at the wrong end of the table. These loan signings aren't a sign of Dougie's managerial genius, they're a last ditch measure to address something that he could and should have addressed much earlier. We might not be in this position if he'd got the balance of the team right before the season started.
Indeed. I didn't suggest otherwise. I think certain players have let themselves and the club down. That isn't to say we shouldn't have had these sorts in at the start. Whether that was Dougies fault of an inability to bring them in then I don't know.
But previously you said that 'Dougie has known the issues all along'...
I think he did. You think he didn't.
So he knew what the issues were but failed to address them?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:12 am

BL3 wrote: So he knew what the issues were but failed to address them?
Or wasn't able to.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by CAPSLOCK » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:13 am

SmokinFrazier wrote:I don't think we have a bad squad at all. Even with the group we have, I'd be pretty confident that a manager like Allardyce would be able to keep us away from relegation if we were in the Premier League. The issue we have right now isn't the players' true level of ability, it's that they are underperforming. Bogdan, Wheater, Ream, Tierney, Medo, Spearing, Eagles, Davies, Chungy and a right back and striker isn't a bad team at all, and certainly not one which would obviously go down. I think we'd be better than at least 3 other teams in the Premier League, assuming we had a good manager in charge.
Spot on

So long as the striker is Messi

What a fcuking nobhead
Sto ut Serviam

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by BL3 » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:20 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
BL3 wrote: So he knew what the issues were but failed to address them?
Or wasn't able to.
He wasn't able to recruit players who weren't getting a game for their parent clubs?

chester white
Promising
Promising
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Rochdale

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by chester white » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:22 am

BL3 wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
BL3 wrote: So he knew what the issues were but failed to address them?
Or wasn't able to.
He wasn't able to recruit players who weren't getting a game for their parent clubs?
He wasn't given the finances on deadline day to bring in Kightly from Stoke and Ramage from Palace
The Sherpa Van Trophy! We've won it one time!

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by BL3 » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:28 am

chester white wrote:
BL3 wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
BL3 wrote: So he knew what the issues were but failed to address them?
Or wasn't able to.
He wasn't able to recruit players who weren't getting a game for their parent clubs?
He wasn't given the finances on deadline day to bring in Kightly from Stoke and Ramage from Palace
So why didn't he bring in the players he's now recruited instead?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:32 am

BL3 wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
BL3 wrote: So he knew what the issues were but failed to address them?
Or wasn't able to.
He wasn't able to recruit players who weren't getting a game for their parent clubs?
No I don't believe he was.

The purse strings were loosened after the Brighton defeat and Eddie realising that the squad needed bolstering with the right characters. That is according to Iles and Nixon. You may not believe it.

I personally think it fits with a lot of what has happened and been said this summer.

But anyhow it doesn't matter now.

Sponge
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by Sponge » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:43 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:...it doesn't matter...

Nailed it. Perhaps now these tedious cyclical "debates" can end (I won't be holding my breath).

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by BL3 » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:45 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
BL3 wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
BL3 wrote: So he knew what the issues were but failed to address them?
Or wasn't able to.
He wasn't able to recruit players who weren't getting a game for their parent clubs?
No I don't believe he was.

The purse strings were loosened after the Brighton defeat and Eddie realising that the squad needed bolstering with the right characters. That is according to Iles and Nixon. You may not believe it.

I personally think it fits with a lot of what has happened and been said this summer.

But anyhow it doesn't matter now.
It matters because there's either a strategy to what he's doing or there isn't. If he thought we needed these sort of 'characters', he's had a long time to address it. Don't forget that he spent part of the budget on Moritz, who's barely kicked a ball for us yet.

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by LeverEnd » Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:29 pm

You can have a strategy, but if it's not working you try something else. If that doesn't work you lose your job. No-one's saying he's done a good job since the end of last season, but some of us are keen to see him get it right.
...

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: Liam Feeney

Post by BL3 » Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:39 pm

LeverEnd wrote:You can have a strategy, but if it's not working you try something else. If that doesn't work you lose your job.
This isn't some sort of finishing school for budding managers. There's only any point in persisting with him if you think he has what it takes to 'get us back on track', which he was brought in to do a year ago. Automatic promotion means 2ppg. Play-offs is nearer 1.5ppg. We're nowhere near either of those totals yet.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DJBlu, TANGODANCER and 42 guests