No Jackett required?

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Jakerbeef
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1288
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:57 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Jakerbeef » Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:45 am

Following his correct prediction of last week's result, the All-Brahan Seer figures we'll get another win this week. With Feeney not playing much part.

I know we're below them but Milwall are guff.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31626
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: No One Likes Em - They Don't Care: the Millwall thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:50 am

Double dome, innit.

Norpig
Promising
Promising
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Norpig » Fri Nov 08, 2013 10:28 am

Day before the game and I am actually looking forward to it, I hate it when I start getting hopeful as its the hop that kills you.

Anyway, seems like our away form has picked up, due to improved defensive performances and hitting teams on the break. It requires a different tactic at home. We have so far failed to control a game at home and this has been our downfall as well as contributing to football which is awful to watch. Hopefully, DF has learned from this and will tell the team to push up the field a bit more. It does not take a lot to change a successful away team into a good home team. IMHO, I would give Medo a more forward midfield role as he can shoot and he seems to the most comfortable player on the ball, using him as a defensive player at home is a waste. I would also stick with the 2 strikers up front, dare I say it, they actually look like making a good partnership. I would start with Hall & CYL to give us some direct play and speed which we need at home.

Finally we need the fans to give them full backing and not to be slagging off players when they make a mistake, they are human, they are playing in the Championship, they are going to make mistakes. COYWM!!!!!

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Fri Nov 08, 2013 10:36 am

Norpig wrote:Day before the game and I am actually looking forward to it, I hate it when I start getting hopeful as its the hop that kills you.

Anyway, seems like our away form has picked up, due to improved defensive performances and hitting teams on the break. It requires a different tactic at home. We have so far failed to control a game at home and this has been our downfall as well as contributing to football which is awful to watch. Hopefully, DF has learned from this and will tell the team to push up the field a bit more. It does not take a lot to change a successful away team into a good home team. IMHO, I would give Medo a more forward midfield role as he can shoot and he seems to the most comfortable player on the ball, using him as a defensive player at home is a waste. I would also stick with the 2 strikers up front, dare I say it, they actually look like making a good partnership. I would start with Hall & CYL to give us some direct play and speed which we need at home.

Finally we need the fans to give them full backing and not to be slagging off players when they make a mistake, they are human, they are playing in the Championship, they are going to make mistakes. COYWM!!!!!
Technically speaking, Mr Pig, it's usually the alcohol that kills you, the hop just adds flavour whilst the alcohol does it work. :wink:
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

Norpig
Promising
Promising
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Norpig » Fri Nov 08, 2013 10:38 am

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
Norpig wrote:Day before the game and I am actually looking forward to it, I hate it when I start getting hopeful as its the hop that kills you.

Anyway, seems like our away form has picked up, due to improved defensive performances and hitting teams on the break. It requires a different tactic at home. We have so far failed to control a game at home and this has been our downfall as well as contributing to football which is awful to watch. Hopefully, DF has learned from this and will tell the team to push up the field a bit more. It does not take a lot to change a successful away team into a good home team. IMHO, I would give Medo a more forward midfield role as he can shoot and he seems to the most comfortable player on the ball, using him as a defensive player at home is a waste. I would also stick with the 2 strikers up front, dare I say it, they actually look like making a good partnership. I would start with Hall & CYL to give us some direct play and speed which we need at home.

Finally we need the fans to give them full backing and not to be slagging off players when they make a mistake, they are human, they are playing in the Championship, they are going to make mistakes. COYWM!!!!!
Technically speaking, Mr Pig, it's usually the alcohol that kills you, the hop just adds flavour whilst the alcohol does it work. :wink:
I am so excited I cannot typ :oops: However, I will be consuming plenty of that there alcohol before entering the ground :pissed:

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by boltonboris » Fri Nov 08, 2013 10:44 am

Absolutely agree 99% with Norpig, except I'm not sure I'd start with Hall.. I'd continue with Danns, who takes up good positions and works hard.. As long as Baptiste can get up the pitch to offer the width, I'm happy for him to drift inside and be difficult to mark.

Everything else though, I think is spot on
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Nov 08, 2013 10:49 am

I feel that someone's got it coming and I'm hoping that it's these eel-eating, hooligan wankers.
May the bridges I burn light your way

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by bobo the clown » Fri Nov 08, 2013 10:58 am

I'm glad the medical team have got things under control, finally ;
Darren Pratley will once again be missing when Bolton try to end their home woes against Millwall.

The former Swansea midfielder is absent with back spasms as the Trotters bid to win their first home game of the season, at the eighth time of asking.

Their quest to do that has been boosted by midfielder Andre Moritz's return from illness while striker Craig Davies is available for selection after a hamstring strain.

Goalkeeper Adam Bogdan (knee) remains sidelined as do the trio of knee-injury victims Joe Riley, Mark Davies and Stuart Holden, along with full-back Marc Tierney (broken foot).
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Norpig
Promising
Promising
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Norpig » Fri Nov 08, 2013 10:59 am

boltonboris wrote:Absolutely agree 99% with Norpig, except I'm not sure I'd start with Hall.. I'd continue with Danns, who takes up good positions and works hard.. As long as Baptiste can get up the pitch to offer the width, I'm happy for him to drift inside and be difficult to mark.

Everything else though, I think is spot on
I like Danns and he tracks back well for the team I just think the directness and speed of Hall can offer more than Danns in an attacking sense. Danns can come on to shore things up when we are 1-0 up with 20 mins left. I would not be disappointed with Danns starting just think we should be more positive at home from the start not when we are losing or drawing with 10 mins left. However, you do make a valid point and I think he will start with the same team as last week, just hoping he pushes one or two players up the field a bit.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by boltonboris » Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:02 am

I think Halls energy and pace would be best used stretching them in the second half. the couple of games he's started, he's not shown the glimpses that he's shown off the bench.

I get your point, but it's always nice to have that plan B.

I also agree that we need to defend higher up the pitch, but a lot of that comes down to the bloke who'll have the armband. He needs to 1) get up himself for a change and 2) pull the centre halves with him.. Should tie a rope to them all in training
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by bobo the clown » Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:07 pm

I love what I have seen of Hall, but he, typical of many wingers, doesn't always make any impact when he starts. He will grow & develop but right now maybe off the bench is the right place.

That said, I'd be comfortable either way.

This has GOT to be the start of having opponents worry about us rather than us them (mind you that should have applied against Yeovil !)
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31626
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:42 pm

Yep, we need to find the way to win at home. Mind you, we had a better record away than at home in 2000/01, when we went up – and in 2003/04, when we finished 8th.


(And in 2011/12, when we went down.)

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:49 pm

bobo the clown wrote:I'm glad the medical team have got things under control, finally ;
Darren Pratley will once again be missing when Bolton try to end their home woes against Millwall.

The former Swansea midfielder is absent with back spasms as the Trotters bid to win their first home game of the season, at the eighth time of asking.

Their quest to do that has been boosted by midfielder Andre Moritz's return from illness while striker Craig Davies is available for selection after a hamstring strain.

Goalkeeper Adam Bogdan (knee) remains sidelined as do the trio of knee-injury victims Joe Riley, Mark Davies and Stuart Holden, along with full-back Marc Tierney (broken foot).

:D it's the appliance of science and individually tailored diet/exercise and fitness regimes!

Il Pirate
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:27 pm
Location: Isle of Wight

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Il Pirate » Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:52 pm

It'd be nice to unbeaten again, 'tho 3 points must surely be the target at home. I hold the same sentiments as Bruce about this lot. Mi' waaaaaaw, salt o' the earth, you can leave yer doors open 'round 'ere darlin', violent, wankers. Let's stuff 'em.
The Pirate predictor has had a polish and I'm looking at at 2-0 scoreline.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Fri Nov 08, 2013 6:13 pm

yay - dougie seems to have figured out the basics of the game!!
DOUGIE FREEDMAN: "Hopefully against Millwall we can get that goal to get in front and make sure we stay in the lead to get that win..."

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by bobo the clown » Fri Nov 08, 2013 6:33 pm

thebish wrote:yay - dougie seems to have figured out the basics of the game!!
DOUGIE FREEDMAN: "Hopefully against Millwall we can get that goal to get in front and make sure we stay in the lead to get that win..."
Scary isn't it !?
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Nov 08, 2013 6:49 pm

thebish wrote:yay - dougie seems to have figured out the basics of the game!!
DOUGIE FREEDMAN: "Hopefully against Millwall we can get that goal to get in front and make sure we stay in the lead to get that win..."
Could you have a word and get Dougie to pluralise that "goal". Makes it so much harder for the opposition to win if we go two or three in front. Just a thought. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Wandering Willy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Wandering Willy » Fri Nov 08, 2013 6:49 pm

Feck Millwall

Feck F troop

Feck Harry the dog

COYFWM
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Nov 08, 2013 6:56 pm

Wandering Willy wrote:Feck Millwall

Feck F troop

Feck Harry the dog

COYFWM
Feck, Yes!

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by officer_dibble » Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:00 pm

Wandering Willy wrote:Feck Millwall

Feck F troop

Feck Harry the dog

COYFWM
:lol: feck the 70's and 80's!

I think we'll bollocks this. 2-2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dave the minion, jmjhb and 15 guests