No Jackett required?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: No Jackett required?
Following his correct prediction of last week's result, the All-Brahan Seer figures we'll get another win this week. With Feeney not playing much part.
I know we're below them but Milwall are guff.
I know we're below them but Milwall are guff.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31626
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: No Jackett required?
Day before the game and I am actually looking forward to it, I hate it when I start getting hopeful as its the hop that kills you.
Anyway, seems like our away form has picked up, due to improved defensive performances and hitting teams on the break. It requires a different tactic at home. We have so far failed to control a game at home and this has been our downfall as well as contributing to football which is awful to watch. Hopefully, DF has learned from this and will tell the team to push up the field a bit more. It does not take a lot to change a successful away team into a good home team. IMHO, I would give Medo a more forward midfield role as he can shoot and he seems to the most comfortable player on the ball, using him as a defensive player at home is a waste. I would also stick with the 2 strikers up front, dare I say it, they actually look like making a good partnership. I would start with Hall & CYL to give us some direct play and speed which we need at home.
Finally we need the fans to give them full backing and not to be slagging off players when they make a mistake, they are human, they are playing in the Championship, they are going to make mistakes. COYWM!!!!!
Anyway, seems like our away form has picked up, due to improved defensive performances and hitting teams on the break. It requires a different tactic at home. We have so far failed to control a game at home and this has been our downfall as well as contributing to football which is awful to watch. Hopefully, DF has learned from this and will tell the team to push up the field a bit more. It does not take a lot to change a successful away team into a good home team. IMHO, I would give Medo a more forward midfield role as he can shoot and he seems to the most comfortable player on the ball, using him as a defensive player at home is a waste. I would also stick with the 2 strikers up front, dare I say it, they actually look like making a good partnership. I would start with Hall & CYL to give us some direct play and speed which we need at home.
Finally we need the fans to give them full backing and not to be slagging off players when they make a mistake, they are human, they are playing in the Championship, they are going to make mistakes. COYWM!!!!!
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: No Jackett required?
Technically speaking, Mr Pig, it's usually the alcohol that kills you, the hop just adds flavour whilst the alcohol does it work.Norpig wrote:Day before the game and I am actually looking forward to it, I hate it when I start getting hopeful as its the hop that kills you.
Anyway, seems like our away form has picked up, due to improved defensive performances and hitting teams on the break. It requires a different tactic at home. We have so far failed to control a game at home and this has been our downfall as well as contributing to football which is awful to watch. Hopefully, DF has learned from this and will tell the team to push up the field a bit more. It does not take a lot to change a successful away team into a good home team. IMHO, I would give Medo a more forward midfield role as he can shoot and he seems to the most comfortable player on the ball, using him as a defensive player at home is a waste. I would also stick with the 2 strikers up front, dare I say it, they actually look like making a good partnership. I would start with Hall & CYL to give us some direct play and speed which we need at home.
Finally we need the fans to give them full backing and not to be slagging off players when they make a mistake, they are human, they are playing in the Championship, they are going to make mistakes. COYWM!!!!!

That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: No Jackett required?
I am so excited I cannot typLost Leopard Spot wrote:Technically speaking, Mr Pig, it's usually the alcohol that kills you, the hop just adds flavour whilst the alcohol does it work.Norpig wrote:Day before the game and I am actually looking forward to it, I hate it when I start getting hopeful as its the hop that kills you.
Anyway, seems like our away form has picked up, due to improved defensive performances and hitting teams on the break. It requires a different tactic at home. We have so far failed to control a game at home and this has been our downfall as well as contributing to football which is awful to watch. Hopefully, DF has learned from this and will tell the team to push up the field a bit more. It does not take a lot to change a successful away team into a good home team. IMHO, I would give Medo a more forward midfield role as he can shoot and he seems to the most comfortable player on the ball, using him as a defensive player at home is a waste. I would also stick with the 2 strikers up front, dare I say it, they actually look like making a good partnership. I would start with Hall & CYL to give us some direct play and speed which we need at home.
Finally we need the fans to give them full backing and not to be slagging off players when they make a mistake, they are human, they are playing in the Championship, they are going to make mistakes. COYWM!!!!!


-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
Absolutely agree 99% with Norpig, except I'm not sure I'd start with Hall.. I'd continue with Danns, who takes up good positions and works hard.. As long as Baptiste can get up the pitch to offer the width, I'm happy for him to drift inside and be difficult to mark.
Everything else though, I think is spot on
Everything else though, I think is spot on
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: No Jackett required?
I feel that someone's got it coming and I'm hoping that it's these eel-eating, hooligan wankers.
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: No Jackett required?
I'm glad the medical team have got things under control, finally ;
Darren Pratley will once again be missing when Bolton try to end their home woes against Millwall.
The former Swansea midfielder is absent with back spasms as the Trotters bid to win their first home game of the season, at the eighth time of asking.
Their quest to do that has been boosted by midfielder Andre Moritz's return from illness while striker Craig Davies is available for selection after a hamstring strain.
Goalkeeper Adam Bogdan (knee) remains sidelined as do the trio of knee-injury victims Joe Riley, Mark Davies and Stuart Holden, along with full-back Marc Tierney (broken foot).
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: No Jackett required?
I like Danns and he tracks back well for the team I just think the directness and speed of Hall can offer more than Danns in an attacking sense. Danns can come on to shore things up when we are 1-0 up with 20 mins left. I would not be disappointed with Danns starting just think we should be more positive at home from the start not when we are losing or drawing with 10 mins left. However, you do make a valid point and I think he will start with the same team as last week, just hoping he pushes one or two players up the field a bit.boltonboris wrote:Absolutely agree 99% with Norpig, except I'm not sure I'd start with Hall.. I'd continue with Danns, who takes up good positions and works hard.. As long as Baptiste can get up the pitch to offer the width, I'm happy for him to drift inside and be difficult to mark.
Everything else though, I think is spot on
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
I think Halls energy and pace would be best used stretching them in the second half. the couple of games he's started, he's not shown the glimpses that he's shown off the bench.
I get your point, but it's always nice to have that plan B.
I also agree that we need to defend higher up the pitch, but a lot of that comes down to the bloke who'll have the armband. He needs to 1) get up himself for a change and 2) pull the centre halves with him.. Should tie a rope to them all in training
I get your point, but it's always nice to have that plan B.
I also agree that we need to defend higher up the pitch, but a lot of that comes down to the bloke who'll have the armband. He needs to 1) get up himself for a change and 2) pull the centre halves with him.. Should tie a rope to them all in training
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: No Jackett required?
I love what I have seen of Hall, but he, typical of many wingers, doesn't always make any impact when he starts. He will grow & develop but right now maybe off the bench is the right place.
That said, I'd be comfortable either way.
This has GOT to be the start of having opponents worry about us rather than us them (mind you that should have applied against Yeovil !)
That said, I'd be comfortable either way.
This has GOT to be the start of having opponents worry about us rather than us them (mind you that should have applied against Yeovil !)
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31626
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: No Jackett required?
Yep, we need to find the way to win at home. Mind you, we had a better record away than at home in 2000/01, when we went up – and in 2003/04, when we finished 8th.
(And in 2011/12, when we went down.)
(And in 2011/12, when we went down.)
Re: No Jackett required?
bobo the clown wrote:I'm glad the medical team have got things under control, finally ;
Darren Pratley will once again be missing when Bolton try to end their home woes against Millwall.
The former Swansea midfielder is absent with back spasms as the Trotters bid to win their first home game of the season, at the eighth time of asking.
Their quest to do that has been boosted by midfielder Andre Moritz's return from illness while striker Craig Davies is available for selection after a hamstring strain.
Goalkeeper Adam Bogdan (knee) remains sidelined as do the trio of knee-injury victims Joe Riley, Mark Davies and Stuart Holden, along with full-back Marc Tierney (broken foot).

Re: No Jackett required?
It'd be nice to unbeaten again, 'tho 3 points must surely be the target at home. I hold the same sentiments as Bruce about this lot. Mi' waaaaaaw, salt o' the earth, you can leave yer doors open 'round 'ere darlin', violent, wankers. Let's stuff 'em.
The Pirate predictor has had a polish and I'm looking at at 2-0 scoreline.
The Pirate predictor has had a polish and I'm looking at at 2-0 scoreline.
Re: No Jackett required?
yay - dougie seems to have figured out the basics of the game!!
DOUGIE FREEDMAN: "Hopefully against Millwall we can get that goal to get in front and make sure we stay in the lead to get that win..."
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: No Jackett required?
Scary isn't it !?thebish wrote:yay - dougie seems to have figured out the basics of the game!!
DOUGIE FREEDMAN: "Hopefully against Millwall we can get that goal to get in front and make sure we stay in the lead to get that win..."
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: No Jackett required?
Could you have a word and get Dougie to pluralise that "goal". Makes it so much harder for the opposition to win if we go two or three in front. Just a thought.thebish wrote:yay - dougie seems to have figured out the basics of the game!!
DOUGIE FREEDMAN: "Hopefully against Millwall we can get that goal to get in front and make sure we stay in the lead to get that win..."

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
Feck Millwall
Feck F troop
Feck Harry the dog
COYFWM
Feck F troop
Feck Harry the dog
COYFWM
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
Feck, Yes!Wandering Willy wrote:Feck Millwall
Feck F troop
Feck Harry the dog
COYFWM
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: No Jackett required?
Wandering Willy wrote:Feck Millwall
Feck F troop
Feck Harry the dog
COYFWM

I think we'll bollocks this. 2-2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: dave the minion, Google [Bot], jmjhb and 13 guests