No Jackett required?

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Wandering Willy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Wandering Willy » Mon Nov 11, 2013 1:53 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:Sack the manager
Know nowt.

We've won our first home game.

It's November.

He gets till Christmas now.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.

malcd1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3608
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:33 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by malcd1 » Mon Nov 11, 2013 1:55 pm

Wandering Willy wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Sack the manager
Know nowt.

We've won our first home game.

It's November.

He gets till Christmas now.
I don't think so. He gets until we lose our next match.
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.

Athers
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3350
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:19 am
Location: Manchester

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Athers » Mon Nov 11, 2013 2:02 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
Athers wrote:Was in the middle of criticising Beckford for his lack of will to get involved when he scored :lol:

Just glad he's scoring because if he doesn't, it's not only that but he hurts the chances of anyone else scoring. All's well that finishes well though.
Didn't his flick out to Lee create the first?
Yes indeed. And a very good through ball it was too!

Had it been N'gog, folks had have been telling us that justified picking him until Christmas.
Of course with a general comment like mine you could find an example of him being involved in some sort of build up, but my broader point is that he's Darren Bent-esque. It will mean he has way fewer touches than an average Championship striker, is unable to win a header, and will spend half the time moaning about not getting free kicks.

Like I said though, these are mostly forgiven if he scores 25 in 46. As a general point though personally I always prefer to share goals round the team than have a one man goal-machine.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by boltonboris » Mon Nov 11, 2013 2:05 pm

It's nice to have both!!
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by jaffka » Mon Nov 11, 2013 2:06 pm

boltonboris wrote:It's nice to have both!!
Yep, like that 99 points season when we scored goals for fun.

Goals are ace.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Nov 11, 2013 2:23 pm

Athers wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
Athers wrote:Was in the middle of criticising Beckford for his lack of will to get involved when he scored :lol:

Just glad he's scoring because if he doesn't, it's not only that but he hurts the chances of anyone else scoring. All's well that finishes well though.
Didn't his flick out to Lee create the first?
Yes indeed. And a very good through ball it was too!

Had it been N'gog, folks had have been telling us that justified picking him until Christmas.
Of course with a general comment like mine you could find an example of him being involved in some sort of build up, but my broader point is that he's Darren Bent-esque. It will mean he has way fewer touches than an average Championship striker, is unable to win a header, and will spend half the time moaning about not getting free kicks.

Like I said though, these are mostly forgiven if he scores 25 in 46. As a general point though personally I always prefer to share goals round the team than have a one man goal-machine.
I'd be delighted with a "3 year ago" Darren Bent. I wouldn't necessarily want to stop anyone else having a pop and scoring a few too!

SmokinFrazier
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by SmokinFrazier » Mon Nov 11, 2013 2:52 pm

boltonboris wrote:Apart from when he cost us another goal by being a bit of a pansy and get arsed off the ball akin to a 6 year old.

Made up for that with the pass, but it's still startling that he gets 'done' by such poor opposition so often.
I don't understand what you have against Ream.You constantly have a go at him and it's not just comments saying "he's not good enough" or whatever, there's always an accusation of him being weak, a coward or something like that. It seems personal, for whatever reason.

Ream's 'mistake' wasn't that bad, anyway. He was initially in a good position but when the pass was struck, it went past a Millwall player who tried to stop it but it had too much pace on it for him, so that caused the pass to go onto their striker very quickly. Ream had no time to adjust his body position and he lost his man. That's not a big deal, certainly nothing like you'd think reading some comments on here. It wasn't good defending but these things can happen. I think Ream probably expecting the first Millwall player to stop the ball but because he missed it, Ream was wrong footed. It was a minor but costly mistake and, unfortunately, these things happen. I'd be more worried about defenders missing tackles or being in the wrong place altogether than these minor things which are very hard to prevent.

User avatar
Abdoulaye's Twin
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9718
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Skye high

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Abdoulaye's Twin » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:03 pm

jaffka wrote:
boltonboris wrote:It's nice to have both!!
Yep, like that 99 points season when we scored goals for fun.

Goals are ace.
Who asked you? :twisted: :wink:

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by boltonboris » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:04 pm

It was bad enough to lead to a goal, which on another day, could've seen us lose 2 points.

I've nothing against him as a person. I don't know him.

He looks like he cares, but he's being made out to be some kind of superhero by the "I told you so bunch".

I just don't rate him as a centre back and that goal, epitomised him as a defender in my opinion.

I just think he needs to toughen up and get a bit dirty
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by jaffka » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:05 pm

Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
jaffka wrote:
boltonboris wrote:It's nice to have both!!
Yep, like that 99 points season when we scored goals for fun.

Goals are ace.
Who asked you? :twisted: :wink:
Certainly not DSB, who seems to be the queen on here.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:06 pm

SmokinFrazier wrote:
boltonboris wrote:Apart from when he cost us another goal by being a bit of a pansy and get arsed off the ball akin to a 6 year old.

Made up for that with the pass, but it's still startling that he gets 'done' by such poor opposition so often.
I don't understand what you have against Ream.You constantly have a go at him and it's not just comments saying "he's not good enough" or whatever, there's always an accusation of him being weak, a coward or something like that. It seems personal, for whatever reason.

Ream's 'mistake' wasn't that bad, anyway. He was initially in a good position but when the pass was struck, it went past a Millwall player who tried to stop it but it had too much pace on it for him, so that caused the pass to go onto their striker very quickly. Ream had no time to adjust his body position and he lost his man. That's not a big deal, certainly nothing like you'd think reading some comments on here. It wasn't good defending but these things can happen. I think Ream probably expecting the first Millwall player to stop the ball but because he missed it, Ream was wrong footed. It was a minor but costly mistake and, unfortunately, these things happen. I'd be more worried about defenders missing tackles or being in the wrong place altogether than these minor things which are very hard to prevent.
I agree with SF :D

User avatar
Abdoulaye's Twin
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9718
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Skye high

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Abdoulaye's Twin » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:12 pm

jaffka wrote:
Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
jaffka wrote:
boltonboris wrote:It's nice to have both!!
Yep, like that 99 points season when we scored goals for fun.

Goals are ace.
Who asked you? :twisted: :wink:
Certainly not DSB, who seems to be the queen on here.
Publishing isn't the skive in the pub it used to be sadly. I'm sure he'll grace us in the not too distant :)

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:13 pm

pics of today's training at euxton.. looks like they stopped for a silence at 11am..

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set ... 379&type=3

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:19 pm

just to prove he's still around... and looking happy as ever..

Image

enrdentw
Promising
Promising
Posts: 448
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:05 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by enrdentw » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:37 pm

thebish wrote:just to prove he's still around... and looking happy as ever..

Image
Do you think he put in an expenses claim for those gloves? Do Adidas not do them?

Dr.Karl
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:58 pm
Location: The Gun Capital/The Pastie Capital
Contact:

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Dr.Karl » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:38 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
What did you make of Ream's part in their goal?

My take on Ream at centreback is that in more games than not he will have a weak moment that gives the opposition a clear goal-scoring opportunity. That's what happened yesterday, isn't it?

I'm not saying that we have a better option at the moment, incidentally.
I can't disagree with what you're saying. It seemed at the ground like a defensive mistake and certainly looks that way on the replay. Its just his overall play that has improved. He doesn't panic, keeps hold of the ball and seems to read the game better. That said I can't recall him playing against a bruising centre forward so far, he might get a torrid time.
Athers wrote:
Of course with a general comment like mine you could find an example of him being involved in some sort of build up, but my broader point is that he's Darren Bent-esque. It will mean he has way fewer touches than an average Championship striker, is unable to win a header, and will spend half the time moaning about not getting free kicks.

Like I said though, these are mostly forgiven if he scores 25 in 46. As a general point though personally I always prefer to share goals round the team than have a one man goal-machine.
Well I'm glad that Athers is on the same page as me. It doesn't matter if he scores 20 goals this season if as a team we only score 50. It should be about the collective rather than the goal machine. Good finish but then he misses an open goal. For a "clinical" striker he misses an awful lot of sitters. It might be he's on a bad run infront of goal. But his overall play isn't up to scratch imv. And I really don't like his attitude, he thinks he some world class superstar who hasn't done well above League 1.
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind - Gandhi

A cynic is man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing - Wilde

I have a fax in my pocket - Gartside

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Nov 11, 2013 4:20 pm

thebish wrote:
SmokinFrazier wrote:
boltonboris wrote:Apart from when he cost us another goal by being a bit of a pansy and get arsed off the ball akin to a 6 year old.

Made up for that with the pass, but it's still startling that he gets 'done' by such poor opposition so often.
I don't understand what you have against Ream.You constantly have a go at him and it's not just comments saying "he's not good enough" or whatever, there's always an accusation of him being weak, a coward or something like that. It seems personal, for whatever reason.

Ream's 'mistake' wasn't that bad, anyway. He was initially in a good position but when the pass was struck, it went past a Millwall player who tried to stop it but it had too much pace on it for him, so that caused the pass to go onto their striker very quickly. Ream had no time to adjust his body position and he lost his man. That's not a big deal, certainly nothing like you'd think reading some comments on here. It wasn't good defending but these things can happen. I think Ream probably expecting the first Millwall player to stop the ball but because he missed it, Ream was wrong footed. It was a minor but costly mistake and, unfortunately, these things happen. I'd be more worried about defenders missing tackles or being in the wrong place altogether than these minor things which are very hard to prevent.
I agree with SF :D
That makes one of us. I'm with Boris.

There's only so many times you can explain that a minor, not bad, mistake that leads directly to a goal is only a minor, not bad, mistake and still believe it.

Unless of course it happens to fit with a wider point of view you're trying to convey.

Ream has been steadily improving over his 1 year 9 months with us, to the point that he's nearly passable as a Championship player of some description. He did alright earlier in the season when he started in Midfield (can't recall who it was against now...might have been Leeds at home).

To suggest that Saturday's fcuk up (which detracted from an otherwise good display from Ream) was anything other than a schoolboy level error, isn't correct in my opinion. Had Knight done the same, he'd have been lambasted.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by CAPSLOCK » Mon Nov 11, 2013 4:23 pm

boltonboris wrote: I've nothing against him as a person. I don't know him.
Its cos he's a ginger left footer who can play, isn't it

Still 2 out of three aint the end of the world

Coulda, woulda, shoulda :)
Sto ut Serviam

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by LeverEnd » Mon Nov 11, 2013 4:24 pm

I've seen Beckford quite a few times this season and have been far from impressed, but on Saturday he looked like a proper striker. You can see he has gained in confidence and his finish was great. Couldn't believe the miss, but it happens to the best of them. He was also involved in Hall's goal and was making runs all over the place and I bet Shittu and co didn't find him an easy opponent. He's never going to be a great all-round footballer but there were hints that he brings more to the team than just finishing. Whether he'll keep doing either thing remains to be seen.
.
...

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by boltonboris » Mon Nov 11, 2013 4:39 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:
boltonboris wrote: I've nothing against him as a person. I don't know him.
Its cos he's a ginger left footer who can play, isn't it

Still 2 out of three aint the end of the world

Coulda, woulda, shoulda :)
Exactly.. I'm right footed.. :D
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests