The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
It's true - much more relaxed.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Montreal Wanderer wrote:The ramrod up your rear has become flexible.
Thanks, Monty.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
So it's all kicked off at the Bury Sculpture Centre. Who knew!
http://new.a-n.co.uk/news/single/bury-s ... ontroversy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Anyone been?
http://new.a-n.co.uk/news/single/bury-s ... ontroversy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Anyone been?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.
Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
Tango is now having kittens...
Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
Tango is now having kittens...

- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
I'll wait for the DFS Summer Sale. They'll have them on decent 60 months terms & interest free, with nothing to pay until June 2015*William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.
Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
Tango is now having kittens...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.
Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
That just illustrates how ridiculous the art market is, almost as ridiculous as the football transfer market.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.
Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
If a fool and their money are that easily parted, how did they get together in the first place? 

May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:That just illustrates how ridiculous the art market is, almost as ridiculous as the football transfer market.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.
Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
Grauniad wrote:Normally, if a work fails to realise its reserve price, it is removed from sale. Without a reserve (often the lower figure of the auction house's estimated price range) there could be some bargains for public institutions – and corresponding embarrassment for living artists. In practice, according to art-world expert Louisa Buck, the artists' own dealers will be "poised like cobras" to bid on the works, if necessary purchasing them if they show signs of selling for low prices. "Galleries won't want to see their artists' prices take a nosedive."
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I call that "insider dealing". Plus auction houses aren't supposed to "bid off the wall", but the cnuts do, especially the big name barstewards... I've seen it in action.Worthy4England wrote:Lost Leopard Spot wrote:That just illustrates how ridiculous the art market is, almost as ridiculous as the football transfer market.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.
Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
Grauniad wrote:Normally, if a work fails to realise its reserve price, it is removed from sale. Without a reserve (often the lower figure of the auction house's estimated price range) there could be some bargains for public institutions – and corresponding embarrassment for living artists. In practice, according to art-world expert Louisa Buck, the artists' own dealers will be "poised like cobras" to bid on the works, if necessary purchasing them if they show signs of selling for low prices. "Galleries won't want to see their artists' prices take a nosedive."
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
The art market is the worst market of all for insider dealing... and is totally free of regulation. I have had very frank conversations with people in which they have described their own insider dealing and price manipulation, apparently without thinking there is anything wrong with it.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I call that "insider dealing". Plus auction houses aren't supposed to "bid off the wall", but the cnuts do, especially the big name barstewards... I've seen it in action.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I don't know where the law draws the boundaries and how they are applied but I know for a fact that if you artificially inflate the price of something for sale during an auction process that it contravenes the law in a manner that could cause the perpetrators to spend some time at Her Maj's Pleasure. But usually they spend lots of her maj's portrait at their own pleasure.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:The art market is the worst market of all for insider dealing... and is totally free of regulation. I have had very frank conversations with people in which they have described their own insider dealing and price manipulation, apparently without thinking there is anything wrong with it.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I call that "insider dealing". Plus auction houses aren't supposed to "bid off the wall", but the cnuts do, especially the big name barstewards... I've seen it in action.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Going tomorrow. Will report.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So it's all kicked off at the Bury Sculpture Centre. Who knew!
http://new.a-n.co.uk/news/single/bury-s ... ontroversy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Anyone been?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Seriously, Mummy...how?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.
Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The Great Art Debate
pecause people often pay a lot of money to own famous things...TANGODANCER wrote:Seriously, Mummy...how?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.
Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
winston churchill's hat is "just a hat" and you could buy a similar hat off ebay for pennies... but the actual one that belonged to winston is a famous hat - so someone would pay a lot of money for it.
Emin's unmade bed is famous - same thing applies.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Yup. I can see not getting it as art. Can't see not getting in as 'history'.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Indeed - I don't have much to add.thebish wrote:pecause people often pay a lot of money to own famous things...TANGODANCER wrote:Seriously, Mummy...how?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.
Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
winston churchill's hat is "just a hat" and you could buy a similar hat off ebay for pennies... but the actual one that belonged to winston is a famous hat - so someone would pay a lot of money for it.
Emin's unmade bed is famous - same thing applies.
Listen to the start of this podcast: http://podcast.ft.com/p/2187" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Emin's bed is like the bricks - something that provoked such outrage it started a genuinely impassioned public debate about what art is and what it is for and as such is a big cultural milestone. Is there a more famous British art work today?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Really? Well thanks for insulting my intelligence, but I was hoping for something a little more than "because it is", that's why I addressed the query at Mummy. I wanted him to say possibly that the art experts, agents and maybe even good old Tracey herself, get together and play think of a number they can get out of some silly sod with money to burn. Not for something of value or real historical interest, but for an old M.F.I bed with a pile of dirty sheets on it. The real art is surely in conning the public, is it not? That's what I was asking our resident man in the middle.thebish wrote:
pecause people often pay a lot of money to own famous things...
winston churchill's hat is "just a hat" and you could buy a similar hat off ebay for pennies... but the actual one that belonged to winston is a famous hat - so someone would pay a lot of money for it.
Emin's unmade bed is famous - same thing applies.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The Great Art Debate
TANGODANCER wrote:Really? Well thanks for insulting my intelligence...thebish wrote:
pecause people often pay a lot of money to own famous things...
winston churchill's hat is "just a hat" and you could buy a similar hat off ebay for pennies... but the actual one that belonged to winston is a famous hat - so someone would pay a lot of money for it.
Emin's unmade bed is famous - same thing applies.

-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
It's your repeated accusation about Emin. It doesn't stand up. She isn't conning anyone. She is producing works of art that interrogate her closest subject. Herself. She isn't trying to fool or trick. These are things that are crucial to her art. You don't have to like it. You don't have to respect it. But it is not a con trick by the artist.TANGODANCER wrote:Really? Well thanks for insulting my intelligence, but I was hoping for something a little more than "because it is", that's why I addressed the query at Mummy. I wanted him to say possibly that the art experts, agents and maybe even good old Tracey herself, get together and play think of a number they can get out of some silly sod with money to burn. Not for something of value or real historical interest, but for an old M.F.I bed with a pile of dirty sheets on it. The real art is surely in conning the public, is it not? That's what I was asking our resident man in the middle.thebish wrote:
pecause people often pay a lot of money to own famous things...
winston churchill's hat is "just a hat" and you could buy a similar hat off ebay for pennies... but the actual one that belonged to winston is a famous hat - so someone would pay a lot of money for it.
Emin's unmade bed is famous - same thing applies.
It offends your taste, that's all. You are entitled to be offended, outraged, disgusted etc. But I don't feel you can describe her as a confidence trickster unless motivated by prejudice.
I've never seen My Bed - though I would like to. I'm not sure what my response would be. I suspect I'd like it, possibly very much. That would be because in some way it resonated with me, made me think, made me feel. Even if I hated it and rejected it though I don't think I'd feel 'conned'.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I don't know the first thing about Tracey Emin as a person Will (I have no desire to) and in that respect I have no prejudice against her. As an artist she draws like a five year old and seems obsessed with her own fanny and now she's moved into neon. I'm happy to accept I can't accept her as any form of artist, but that's just me, so best thing is for me to just ignore her....if I can avoid her..William the White wrote:
It's your repeated accusation about Emin. It doesn't stand up. She isn't conning anyone. She is producing works of art that interrogate her closest subject. Herself. She isn't trying to fool or trick. These are things that are crucial to her art. You don't have to like it. You don't have to respect it. But it is not a con trick by the artist.
It offends your taste, that's all. You are entitled to be offended, outraged, disgusted etc. But I don't feel you can describe her as a confidence trickster unless motivated by prejudice.
I've never seen My Bed - though I would like to. I'm not sure what my response would be. I suspect I'd like it, possibly very much. That would be because in some way it resonated with me, made me think, made me feel. Even if I hated it and rejected it though I don't think I'd feel 'conned'.

http://tinyurl.com/nc3t5aw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests