The Great Art Debate

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon May 19, 2014 5:04 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:The ramrod up your rear has become flexible.
:lol:

Thanks, Monty.
It's true - much more relaxed.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed May 21, 2014 9:23 pm

So it's all kicked off at the Bury Sculpture Centre. Who knew!

http://new.a-n.co.uk/news/single/bury-s ... ontroversy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Anyone been?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by William the White » Tue May 27, 2014 5:55 pm

I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.

Her dealer says that is far too cheap.

Tango is now having kittens... :wink:

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34735
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Worthy4England » Tue May 27, 2014 6:10 pm

William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.

Her dealer says that is far too cheap.

Tango is now having kittens... :wink:
I'll wait for the DFS Summer Sale. They'll have them on decent 60 months terms & interest free, with nothing to pay until June 2015*

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue May 27, 2014 6:18 pm

William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.

Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Tue May 27, 2014 6:36 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.

Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.
That just illustrates how ridiculous the art market is, almost as ridiculous as the football transfer market.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Bruce Rioja » Tue May 27, 2014 6:45 pm

If a fool and their money are that easily parted, how did they get together in the first place? :?
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34735
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Worthy4England » Tue May 27, 2014 6:50 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.

Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.
That just illustrates how ridiculous the art market is, almost as ridiculous as the football transfer market.
Grauniad wrote:Normally, if a work fails to realise its reserve price, it is removed from sale. Without a reserve (often the lower figure of the auction house's estimated price range) there could be some bargains for public institutions – and corresponding embarrassment for living artists. In practice, according to art-world expert Louisa Buck, the artists' own dealers will be "poised like cobras" to bid on the works, if necessary purchasing them if they show signs of selling for low prices. "Galleries won't want to see their artists' prices take a nosedive."

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Tue May 27, 2014 6:55 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.

Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.
That just illustrates how ridiculous the art market is, almost as ridiculous as the football transfer market.
Grauniad wrote:Normally, if a work fails to realise its reserve price, it is removed from sale. Without a reserve (often the lower figure of the auction house's estimated price range) there could be some bargains for public institutions – and corresponding embarrassment for living artists. In practice, according to art-world expert Louisa Buck, the artists' own dealers will be "poised like cobras" to bid on the works, if necessary purchasing them if they show signs of selling for low prices. "Galleries won't want to see their artists' prices take a nosedive."
I call that "insider dealing". Plus auction houses aren't supposed to "bid off the wall", but the cnuts do, especially the big name barstewards... I've seen it in action.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue May 27, 2014 7:00 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I call that "insider dealing". Plus auction houses aren't supposed to "bid off the wall", but the cnuts do, especially the big name barstewards... I've seen it in action.
The art market is the worst market of all for insider dealing... and is totally free of regulation. I have had very frank conversations with people in which they have described their own insider dealing and price manipulation, apparently without thinking there is anything wrong with it.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Tue May 27, 2014 7:05 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I call that "insider dealing". Plus auction houses aren't supposed to "bid off the wall", but the cnuts do, especially the big name barstewards... I've seen it in action.
The art market is the worst market of all for insider dealing... and is totally free of regulation. I have had very frank conversations with people in which they have described their own insider dealing and price manipulation, apparently without thinking there is anything wrong with it.
I don't know where the law draws the boundaries and how they are applied but I know for a fact that if you artificially inflate the price of something for sale during an auction process that it contravenes the law in a manner that could cause the perpetrators to spend some time at Her Maj's Pleasure. But usually they spend lots of her maj's portrait at their own pleasure.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by William the White » Tue May 27, 2014 8:16 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So it's all kicked off at the Bury Sculpture Centre. Who knew!

http://new.a-n.co.uk/news/single/bury-s ... ontroversy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Anyone been?
Going tomorrow. Will report.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by TANGODANCER » Tue May 27, 2014 8:26 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.

Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.
Seriously, Mummy...how?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by thebish » Tue May 27, 2014 8:32 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.

Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.
Seriously, Mummy...how?
pecause people often pay a lot of money to own famous things...

winston churchill's hat is "just a hat" and you could buy a similar hat off ebay for pennies... but the actual one that belonged to winston is a famous hat - so someone would pay a lot of money for it.

Emin's unmade bed is famous - same thing applies.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Prufrock » Tue May 27, 2014 8:41 pm

Yup. I can see not getting it as art. Can't see not getting in as 'history'.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue May 27, 2014 8:47 pm

thebish wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:I note that Tracy Emin's famous/notorious installation My Bed is on sale with a price tag of £800,000-£1.2 million.

Her dealer says that is far too cheap.
I do think it will go for more than that - even as historical memorabilia it's worth more than that.
Seriously, Mummy...how?
pecause people often pay a lot of money to own famous things...

winston churchill's hat is "just a hat" and you could buy a similar hat off ebay for pennies... but the actual one that belonged to winston is a famous hat - so someone would pay a lot of money for it.

Emin's unmade bed is famous - same thing applies.
Indeed - I don't have much to add.

Listen to the start of this podcast: http://podcast.ft.com/p/2187" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Emin's bed is like the bricks - something that provoked such outrage it started a genuinely impassioned public debate about what art is and what it is for and as such is a big cultural milestone. Is there a more famous British art work today?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by TANGODANCER » Tue May 27, 2014 9:25 pm

thebish wrote:
pecause people often pay a lot of money to own famous things...

winston churchill's hat is "just a hat" and you could buy a similar hat off ebay for pennies... but the actual one that belonged to winston is a famous hat - so someone would pay a lot of money for it.

Emin's unmade bed is famous - same thing applies.
Really? Well thanks for insulting my intelligence, but I was hoping for something a little more than "because it is", that's why I addressed the query at Mummy. I wanted him to say possibly that the art experts, agents and maybe even good old Tracey herself, get together and play think of a number they can get out of some silly sod with money to burn. Not for something of value or real historical interest, but for an old M.F.I bed with a pile of dirty sheets on it. The real art is surely in conning the public, is it not? That's what I was asking our resident man in the middle.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by thebish » Tue May 27, 2014 9:26 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
thebish wrote:
pecause people often pay a lot of money to own famous things...

winston churchill's hat is "just a hat" and you could buy a similar hat off ebay for pennies... but the actual one that belonged to winston is a famous hat - so someone would pay a lot of money for it.

Emin's unmade bed is famous - same thing applies.
Really? Well thanks for insulting my intelligence...
:conf:

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by William the White » Tue May 27, 2014 9:56 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
thebish wrote:
pecause people often pay a lot of money to own famous things...

winston churchill's hat is "just a hat" and you could buy a similar hat off ebay for pennies... but the actual one that belonged to winston is a famous hat - so someone would pay a lot of money for it.

Emin's unmade bed is famous - same thing applies.
Really? Well thanks for insulting my intelligence, but I was hoping for something a little more than "because it is", that's why I addressed the query at Mummy. I wanted him to say possibly that the art experts, agents and maybe even good old Tracey herself, get together and play think of a number they can get out of some silly sod with money to burn. Not for something of value or real historical interest, but for an old M.F.I bed with a pile of dirty sheets on it. The real art is surely in conning the public, is it not? That's what I was asking our resident man in the middle.
It's your repeated accusation about Emin. It doesn't stand up. She isn't conning anyone. She is producing works of art that interrogate her closest subject. Herself. She isn't trying to fool or trick. These are things that are crucial to her art. You don't have to like it. You don't have to respect it. But it is not a con trick by the artist.

It offends your taste, that's all. You are entitled to be offended, outraged, disgusted etc. But I don't feel you can describe her as a confidence trickster unless motivated by prejudice.

I've never seen My Bed - though I would like to. I'm not sure what my response would be. I suspect I'd like it, possibly very much. That would be because in some way it resonated with me, made me think, made me feel. Even if I hated it and rejected it though I don't think I'd feel 'conned'.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by TANGODANCER » Tue May 27, 2014 10:27 pm

William the White wrote:
It's your repeated accusation about Emin. It doesn't stand up. She isn't conning anyone. She is producing works of art that interrogate her closest subject. Herself. She isn't trying to fool or trick. These are things that are crucial to her art. You don't have to like it. You don't have to respect it. But it is not a con trick by the artist.

It offends your taste, that's all. You are entitled to be offended, outraged, disgusted etc. But I don't feel you can describe her as a confidence trickster unless motivated by prejudice.

I've never seen My Bed - though I would like to. I'm not sure what my response would be. I suspect I'd like it, possibly very much. That would be because in some way it resonated with me, made me think, made me feel. Even if I hated it and rejected it though I don't think I'd feel 'conned'.
I don't know the first thing about Tracey Emin as a person Will (I have no desire to) and in that respect I have no prejudice against her. As an artist she draws like a five year old and seems obsessed with her own fanny and now she's moved into neon. I'm happy to accept I can't accept her as any form of artist, but that's just me, so best thing is for me to just ignore her....if I can avoid her.. :wink:

http://tinyurl.com/nc3t5aw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests