General Chit Chat

[Nicko58]

The product will be adversely affected....

The product will be adversely effected....

Which?

Affected.

Whatever causes the producted to be adversely affected would be having an effect on the product, however the product itself would be adversely affected.

More details can be found here.

[KeyserSoze]

aye.

Affect the effect

[Bruce Rioja]

The product will be adversely affected....

The product will be adversely effected....

Which?

Affected.

Whatever causes the producted to be adversely affected would be having an effect on the product, however the product itself would be adversely affected.

More details can be found here.

Cheers, Nicko. That's just won me a pint.

[Lord Kangana]

Sound Affects.

Superb album.

[KeyserSoze]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens ... plain.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

and on we go, down the road to streamlining the English language into one, all-purpose word that nobody can object to. Or tell apart.

[Prufrock]

Imagine trying so hard and giving that much of a shit and wasting [not "eating" -phone!] that many people's time for something so woefully insignificant.

[KeyserSoze]

^ feeling suicidal


*starts campaign*

[Worthy4England]

How muthafcking crazy is the law on divorce becoming (well I say becoming - it's already been fcuked for a long time). Apparently spouses can now claim support an unlimited time after the divorce.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... ayout.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[jaffka]

How muthafcking crazy is the law on divorce becoming (well I say becoming - it's already been fcuked for a long time). Apparently spouses can now claim support an unlimited time after the divorce.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... ayout.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Saw that yesterday on the Beeb, absolutely fecking bonkers.

Guys be careful where you dip your wicks and make sure you glove up and pull out

[Lord Kangana]

Just don't get married, no?

[Bruce Rioja]

How muthafcking crazy is the law on divorce becoming (well I say becoming - it's already been fcuked for a long time). Apparently spouses can now claim support an unlimited time after the divorce.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... ayout.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I await communication from the former Mrs Rioja's representatives enquiring into my pension provisions and such like.

[Worthy4England]

How muthafcking crazy is the law on divorce becoming (well I say becoming - it's already been fcuked for a long time). Apparently spouses can now claim support an unlimited time after the divorce.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... ayout.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I await communication from the former Mrs Rioja's representatives enquiring into my pension provisions and such like.

I nearly said "watch out Brucie" in the original post!

You might want to remove that post about bagging a big Contract at work too - gotta be some untapped bonus in there somewhere...

[Beefheart]

I thought there was a ruling to the contrary recently? Where a judge basically said 'get a job!' to the woman in the case.

[thebish]

I thought there was a ruling to the contrary recently? Where a judge basically said 'get a job!' to the woman in the case.

aye - this was a higher court... the supreme one

just to be clear - the ruling isn't (yet) that she is entitled to his cash - just that her claim cannot be dismissed summarily simply because time has passed...

the issue seems to be that they didn't sort out a "financial order" when they divorced. If they had, then there would be no issue...

lots of commentators I have heard seem to think that when it does go to court, she won't be walking out with millions...

[Worthy4England]

I thought there was a ruling to the contrary recently? Where a judge basically said 'get a job!' to the woman in the case.

aye - this was a higher court... the supreme one

just to be clear - the ruling isn't (yet) that she is entitled to his cash - just that her claim cannot be dismissed summarily simply because time has passed...

the issue seems to be that they didn't sort out a "financial order" when they divorced. If they had, then there would be no issue...

lots of commentators I have heard seem to think that when it does go to court, she won't be walking out with millions...

The fact that she can even take a punt at it, shows how fcuked the system is.

[thebish]

I thought there was a ruling to the contrary recently? Where a judge basically said 'get a job!' to the woman in the case.

aye - this was a higher court... the supreme one

just to be clear - the ruling isn't (yet) that she is entitled to his cash - just that her claim cannot be dismissed summarily simply because time has passed...

the issue seems to be that they didn't sort out a "financial order" when they divorced. If they had, then there would be no issue...

lots of commentators I have heard seem to think that when it does go to court, she won't be walking out with millions...

The fact that she can even take a punt at it, shows how fcuked the system is.

aye... no arguments there!

[Bruce Rioja]

I thought there was a ruling to the contrary recently? Where a judge basically said 'get a job!' to the woman in the case.

aye - this was a higher court... the supreme one

just to be clear - the ruling isn't (yet) that she is entitled to his cash - just that her claim cannot be dismissed summarily simply because time has passed...

the issue seems to be that they didn't sort out a "financial order" when they divorced. If they had, then there would be no issue...

lots of commentators I have heard seem to think that when it does go to court, she won't be walking out with millions...

The fact that she can even take a punt at it, shows how fcuked the system is.

Oh, she's taking a punt at it at his expense. He's paying both of their legal bills, the tab for which currently stands at £500,000.

[jaffka]

She's a sponger. A tabloid needs to dig the dirt on this bag.

[Worthy4England]

She's a sponger. A tabloid needs to dig the dirt on this bag.

I like the open ended approach you're developing here!

[Harry Genshaw]

To be fair - they did have a kid together who, from what I can gather, she brought up alone without maintenance. It's not unreasonable, that he contributes to his upbringing now, if for whatever reason the law couldn't make him do so at the time