creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38832
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Thu Dec 01, 2022 11:45 am

Fastest a test side has ever scored 500. Not exactly surprising this is an innings you won’t see often.

What a position to be in. Bet Stokes and Mccullum are wishing they’d picked the extra bowler now though.

England can bat till lunch day two and this rate be over 650. And frankly given the pitch there is no real reason to declare because your only hope of winning is batting once I suspect and hoping the pitch turns a bit day 4 and 5.

Whatever Brendan Mccullum has done to this team the man deserves knighting. Never seen a turnaround like this.

Brook looked absolutely assured getting his 100 too and in normal circumstances he’d not be picked. Suddenly gone from a side who you could hardly name a test level batsman for to a side that has too many options to choose from.

User avatar
Abdoulaye's Twin
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9719
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Skye high

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Abdoulaye's Twin » Thu Dec 01, 2022 1:20 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 11:38 am
Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 11:11 am
Fookin hell, what is going on? :shock:

When was the last time the first 3 up hit tons? :pissed:
Not sure but the last time we scored 4 tons in an innings isn't that long ago - 2007.
2007? I was almost a young whipper snapper back then :D

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34739
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Thu Dec 01, 2022 1:48 pm

Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 1:20 pm
Worthy4England wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 11:38 am
Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 11:11 am
Fookin hell, what is going on? :shock:

When was the last time the first 3 up hit tons? :pissed:
Not sure but the last time we scored 4 tons in an innings isn't that long ago - 2007.
2007? I was almost a young whipper snapper back then :D
All comparative - with England's batting, you're often looking back to the 1930's or the 1890's! :-)

As to the 4 hundreds v West Indies in 2007, they actually had us at 83-2 at one point, Cook scored 100 at no2, then 5,6 & 7 all scored tons (Collingwood, Bell, Prior)

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38832
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Thu Dec 01, 2022 1:58 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 1:48 pm
Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 1:20 pm
Worthy4England wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 11:38 am
Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 11:11 am
Fookin hell, what is going on? :shock:

When was the last time the first 3 up hit tons? :pissed:
Not sure but the last time we scored 4 tons in an innings isn't that long ago - 2007.
2007? I was almost a young whipper snapper back then :D
All comparative - with England's batting, you're often looking back to the 1930's or the 1890's! :-)

As to the 4 hundreds v West Indies in 2007, they actually had us at 83-2 at one point, Cook scored 100 at no2, then 5,6 & 7 all scored tons (Collingwood, Bell, Prior)
I’m wondering if any side has ever had 4 centurions in a single day?

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34739
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Thu Dec 01, 2022 3:15 pm

Dunno mate - I suspect there's a lot more stats to come from today's performance in the next couple of days...

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34739
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Thu Dec 01, 2022 3:17 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 3:15 pm
Dunno mate - I suspect there's a lot more stats to come from today's performance in the next couple of days...
Edit - first time there's been four centurions on day 1. (not sure about on any other days...)

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34739
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Dec 02, 2022 4:42 pm

181 for 0 in reply - still a long way off, but maybe giving the wicket some context...

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Dec 02, 2022 4:53 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Fri Dec 02, 2022 4:42 pm
181 for 0 in reply - still a long way off, but maybe giving the wicket some context...
Well, I was quite surprised to see that at yesterday's close, that those you know far more about it than me were predicting something like a 43% chance of it ending in a draw.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri Dec 02, 2022 5:41 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Fri Dec 02, 2022 4:42 pm
181 for 0 in reply - still a long way off, but maybe giving the wicket some context...
Think it might be hinted at as a batters wicket...somehow? We could do with a break-through though.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34739
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Dec 02, 2022 7:23 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
Fri Dec 02, 2022 5:41 pm
Worthy4England wrote:
Fri Dec 02, 2022 4:42 pm
181 for 0 in reply - still a long way off, but maybe giving the wicket some context...
Think it might be hinted at as a batters wicket...somehow? We could do with a break-through though.
Next one will probably be like a corrugated tin roof.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34739
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Dec 03, 2022 11:02 am

Yeah - although we got there quite a lot quicker, there's actually 1 run difference between the scores when the 4th wicket went down - we were 462, they were 413. In fact if you look wicket for wicket so far, they're pretty closely matched...

1st Eng 233, Pak 225
2nd Eng 235, Pak 245
3rd Eng 286, Pak 290
4th Eng 462, Pak 413

Guess it's just whether we could polish the tail from here...

Edited: I updated the 4th innings... :-)

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Dec 03, 2022 11:17 am

Could they manage the first innings total record? (not looked what it is)
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Dec 03, 2022 11:23 am

TANGODANCER wrote:
Sat Dec 03, 2022 11:17 am
Could they manage the first innings total record? (not looked what it is)
Hey up, Babar's gone....... and another one bites the dust too.... :oyea:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34739
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Dec 03, 2022 11:32 am

On the first innings aggregate, Sri Lanka hit something like 950 in response to India's 580 in the 90's so I think they'd need 800 or so...not sure if there's a higher first innings aggregate....

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Dec 03, 2022 12:04 pm

Cheerts Worthy. 499-7 at close makes a day end well.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34739
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Dec 03, 2022 1:03 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
Sat Dec 03, 2022 12:04 pm
Cheerts Worthy. 499-7 at close makes a day end well.
Aye. Not too often, you give yourselves a pat on the back when the oppo have hit 500 and still have 3 wickets left

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Dec 04, 2022 9:15 am

Pakistan score 579...but it isn't enough...We're 185-3 second innings and looking pretty good...
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Prufrock » Sun Dec 04, 2022 10:30 am

We're going to lose this
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34739
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Dec 04, 2022 11:33 am

Doooooooomed!

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Dec 04, 2022 12:09 pm

Prufrock wrote:
Sun Dec 04, 2022 10:30 am
We're going to lose this
My theoretical money's on the draw.
May the bridges I burn light your way

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dave the minion and 13 guests