To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
I'd prefer 10 more clean sheetsDave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:35 pmForino, man. I think with the right service (and assuming he stays fit and selected) he can get you 10 goals a season.
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Randall not looking as poor as usual. Still not expecting him to hit a shot on target though.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31610
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Well, there is that - but I'm hopeful that can improve too next season. It kinda has to.jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:36 pmI'd prefer 10 more clean sheetsDave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:35 pmForino, man. I think with the right service (and assuming he stays fit and selected) he can get you 10 goals a season.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31610
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Lincoln winning 2-0 at Stockport. I did say they'd have a big say on promotion... although Stockport have seemed playoff-bound since about October
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Elsewhere, Stockport County are fecking up their chances of auto promotion.
Over to Charlton to save football later.
Over to Charlton to save football later.
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
They were never getting automatics. Too big a gap to catch up on. Wrexham will do it today.
Matete puts the ball in the back of the net, foul by McAtee stopped it. Didn't see much in that tbh.
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Wrexham's infrastructure is basically non-league, they need urgent capex. Promotion will mean most of their money goes on insane wages. Oh well.
Did you know both our former FC and CFO are now at Wrexham?
Last edited by jmjhb on Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38809
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Which would make a big difference.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:35 pmForino, man. I think with the right service (and assuming he stays fit and selected) he can get you 10 goals a season.
- knobpolisher
- Reliable
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 1:52 pm
- Location: Sunny Southport
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Looking upwards to the champo I see preston are in real danger of dropping a division
People haven't got a good word for you, but i have T**T.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31610
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Wrexham would bring more away fans (we keep 95% of the revenue) and it'd probably be on TV again.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:57 pmI get your point about saving football, but in terms of who I'd rather face next season, it's Charlton not Wrexham.
It's why I'm glad there are northern clubs coming up and I hope that Bradford don't bottle it again.
Last edited by jmjhb on Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31610
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Interesting. Could go to the last day for everyone except Cardiff. Hull 0-0 Derby and Preston 0-1 Plymouth (HTs) are huge games. (One other thing - if Cardiff go down, maybe they'd be tempted to rebuild round Sheehan?)knobpolisher wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:55 pmLooking upwards to the champo I see preston are in real danger of dropping a division
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31610
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
True. But which side is likelier to keep us out of the top two?jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:59 pmWrexham would bring more away fans, and it'd probably be on TV again.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:57 pmI get your point about saving football, but in terms of who I'd rather face next season, it's Charlton not Wrexham.
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
I'd say both are part of a group of 7-8 (us included, haha) that could potentially be up there with the right signings.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:02 pmTrue. But which side is likelier to keep us out of the top two?jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:59 pmWrexham would bring more away fans, and it'd probably be on TV again.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:57 pmI get your point about saving football, but in terms of who I'd rather face next season, it's Charlton not Wrexham.
Last edited by jmjhb on Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Who are you referring to? FC? and CFO?jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:53 pmWrexham's infrastructure is basically non-league, they need urgent capex. Promotion will mean most of their money goes on insane wages. Oh well.
Did you know both our former FC and CFO are now at Wrexham?
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31610
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
So would I mate, but I think Wrexham would be harder to finish above, and that's the key thing I'm bothered about next season.jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:03 pmI'd say both are part of a group of 7-8 (us included, haha) that could potentially be up there with the right signings.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:02 pmTrue. But which side is likelier to keep us out of the top two?jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:59 pmWrexham would bring more away fans, and it'd probably be on TV again.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:57 pmI get your point about saving football, but in terms of who I'd rather face next season, it's Charlton not Wrexham.
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Financial controller and chief finance officerMar wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:04 pmWho are you referring to? FC? and CFO?jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:53 pmWrexham's infrastructure is basically non-league, they need urgent capex. Promotion will mean most of their money goes on insane wages. Oh well.
Did you know both our former FC and CFO are now at Wrexham?
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Yeah, just tried a quick google but couldn't see any names pop up.jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:05 pmFinancial controller and chief finance officerMar wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:04 pmWho are you referring to? FC? and CFO?jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:53 pmWrexham's infrastructure is basically non-league, they need urgent capex. Promotion will mean most of their money goes on insane wages. Oh well.
Did you know both our former FC and CFO are now at Wrexham?
Doesn't surprise me to be honest, probably people with connections to Parkinson all chucking in recommendations for people they like to work with.
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Interesting, although let's agree to disagree. I think both will end up promoted this season one way or t'other.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:04 pmSo would I mate, but I think Wrexham would be harder to finish above, and that's the key thing I'm bothered about next season.jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:03 pmI'd say both are part of a group of 7-8 (us included, haha) that could potentially be up there with the right signings.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:02 pmTrue. But which side is likelier to keep us out of the top two?jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:59 pmWrexham would bring more away fans, and it'd probably be on TV again.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:57 pmI get your point about saving football, but in terms of who I'd rather face next season, it's Charlton not Wrexham.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31610
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: To be or not to Be? . ..Away to Peterborough, Sat 26th Apr. 3-0'clock.
Fair enough chap. I agree that it would be good to get shut of both.jmjhb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:11 pmInteresting, although let's agree to disagree. I think both will end up promoted this season one way or t'other.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:04 pmI think Wrexham would be harder to finish above, and that's the key thing I'm bothered about next season.
By the way, I'm enjoying the idea of a "financial controller" at Wrexham. Can't be an easy job.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 11 guests